Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming Citation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Cai,et al. Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. , 2013, Cell stem cell.
[2] T. Ludwig,et al. Homologous recombination DNA repair genes play a critical role in reprogramming to a pluripotent state. , 2013, Cell reports.
[3] Dong Wook Han,et al. A central role for TFIID in the pluripotent transcription circuitry , 2013, Nature.
[4] Bradley E. Bernstein,et al. Genome-wide Chromatin State Transitions Associated with Developmental and Environmental Cues , 2013, Cell.
[5] W. Reik,et al. Nanog-dependent function of Tet1 and Tet2 in establishment of pluripotency , 2013, Nature.
[6] Alexander S. Garruss,et al. The RNA Pol II Elongation Factor Ell3 Marks Enhancers in ES Cells and Primes Future Gene Activation , 2013, Cell.
[7] I. Sancho-Martinez,et al. Stem cells: Surf the waves of reprogramming , 2013, Nature.
[8] S. Seneca,et al. Human embryonic stem cells commonly display large mitochondrial DNA deletions , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.
[9] M. Dezawa,et al. The elite and stochastic model for iPS cell generation: Multilineage‐differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells are readily reprogrammable into iPS cells , 2013, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.
[10] Jeroen Krijgsveld,et al. Highly coordinated proteome dynamics during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. , 2012, Cell reports.
[11] S. Ramaswamy,et al. A Molecular Roadmap of Reprogramming Somatic Cells into iPS Cells , 2012, Cell.
[12] Yi Zhang,et al. Embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell: an epigenetic perspective , 2012, Cell Research.
[13] J. Wrana,et al. A late transition in somatic cell reprogramming requires regulators distinct from the pluripotency network. , 2012, Cell stem cell.
[14] Jieying Zhu,et al. H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs , 2012, Nature Genetics.
[15] Rudolf Jaenisch,et al. Nuclear cloning and direct reprogramming: the long and the short path to Stockholm. , 2012, Cell stem cell.
[16] Frank Soldner,et al. iPSC Disease Modeling , 2012, Science.
[17] Greg Donahue,et al. Facilitators and Impediments of the Pluripotency Reprogramming Factors' Initial Engagement with the Genome , 2012, Cell.
[18] R. Jaenisch,et al. Transdifferentiation by defined factors as a powerful research tool to address basic biological questions , 2012, Cell cycle.
[19] Hui Yang,et al. Zscan4 promotes genomic stability during reprogramming and dramatically improves the quality of iPS cells as demonstrated by tetraploid complementation , 2012, Cell Research.
[20] M. Gerstein,et al. Somatic copy-number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells , 2012, Nature.
[21] G. Daley,et al. Metabolic regulation in pluripotent stem cells during reprogramming and self-renewal. , 2012, Cell stem cell.
[22] Abdulrahim A. Sajini,et al. Analysis of endogenous Oct4 activation during induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming using an inducible Oct4 lineage label. , 2012, Stem cells.
[23] K. Plath,et al. The roles of the reprogramming factors Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 in resetting the somatic cell epigenome during induced pluripotent stem cell generation , 2012, Genome Biology.
[24] Charles Y. Lin,et al. Transcriptional Amplification in Tumor Cells with Elevated c-Myc , 2012, Cell.
[25] D. Green,et al. c-Myc Is a Universal Amplifier of Expressed Genes in Lymphocytes and Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, Cell.
[26] Thomas Vierbuchen,et al. Molecular roadblocks for cellular reprogramming. , 2012, Molecular cell.
[27] F. Wang,et al. Influences of lamin A levels on induction of pluripotent stem cells , 2012, Biology Open.
[28] J. Dekker,et al. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters , 2012, Nature.
[29] Sandy L. Klemm,et al. Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase , 2012, Cell.
[30] Alan Mackay-Sim,et al. Variability in the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Importance for Disease Modeling , 2012, Stem cells translational medicine.
[31] G. Bhagat,et al. Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2 , 2012, Nature.
[32] Muneef Ayyash,et al. The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming , 2012, Nature.
[33] Yi Zhang,et al. Kdm2b promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation by facilitating gene activation early in reprogramming , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.
[34] Chi V Dang,et al. MYC on the Path to Cancer , 2012, Cell.
[35] D. Pei,et al. Vitamin C improves the quality of somatic cell reprogramming , 2012, Nature Genetics.
[36] P. Park,et al. Ascorbic acid prevents loss of Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting and facilitates generation of all-iPS cell mice from terminally differentiated B cells , 2012, Nature Genetics.
[37] Yutao Du,et al. Low incidence of DNA sequence variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells generated by nonintegrating plasmid expression. , 2012, Cell stem cell.
[38] Eric S. Lander,et al. Chromatin modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming , 2012, Nature.
[39] Marius Wernig,et al. Comprehensive qPCR profiling of gene expression in single neuronal cells , 2011, Nature Protocols.
[40] Rudolf Jaenisch,et al. Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[41] G. Pan,et al. The histone demethylases Jhdm1a/1b enhance somatic cell reprogramming in a vitamin-C-dependent manner. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[42] Eran Meshorer,et al. Global epigenetic changes during somatic cell reprogramming to iPS cells. , 2011, Journal of molecular cell biology.
[43] Andrew P. Feinberg,et al. Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.
[44] Jennifer M. Bolin,et al. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells , 2011, Nature Methods.
[45] N. Benvenisty,et al. Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[46] Yoshifumi Kawamura,et al. Direct reprogramming of somatic cells is promoted by maternal transcription factor Glis1 , 2011, Nature.
[47] H. Schöler,et al. Optimal reprogramming factor stoichiometry increases colony numbers and affects molecular characteristics of murine induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.
[48] C. Perez-Iratxeta,et al. Constitutive heterochromatin reorganization during somatic cell reprogramming , 2011, The EMBO journal.
[49] Robert L. Judson,et al. Multiple targets of miR-302 and miR-372 promote reprogramming of human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.
[50] Jun S. Song,et al. Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.
[51] S. Lipton,et al. Direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neural progenitors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[52] Jonathan M. Monk,et al. Wdr5 Mediates Self-Renewal and Reprogramming via the Embryonic Stem Cell Core Transcriptional Network , 2011, Cell.
[53] Mudit Gupta,et al. Highly efficient miRNA-mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[54] J. Chen,et al. Rational optimization of reprogramming culture conditions for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells with ultra-high efficiency and fast kinetics , 2011, Cell Research.
[55] Maikun Teng,et al. MicroRNA Cluster 302–367 Enhances Somatic Cell Reprogramming by Accelerating a Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[56] R. Stewart,et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.
[57] Riitta Lahesmaa,et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency , 2011, Nature.
[58] Jarrett Rosenberg,et al. Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.
[59] T. Tada,et al. Sox2 expression effects on direct reprogramming efficiency as determined by alternative somatic cell fate. , 2011, Stem cell research.
[60] Gang Wang,et al. Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.
[61] Qi Zhou,et al. Brief Report: Combined Chemical Treatment Enables Oct4‐Induced Reprogramming from Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts , 2011, Stem cells.
[62] Michael J. Ziller,et al. Reference Maps of Human ES and iPS Cell Variation Enable High-Throughput Characterization of Pluripotent Cell Lines , 2011, Cell.
[63] Zachary D. Smith,et al. Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[64] Julie V. Harness,et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[65] Mark Ellisman,et al. Mitochondrial Rejuvenation After Induced Pluripotency , 2010, PloS one.
[66] K. Hochedlinger,et al. Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications. , 2010, Genes & development.
[67] Yoav Mayshar,et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[68] Richard A Young,et al. Chromatin structure and gene expression programs of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[69] Aaron M. Newman,et al. Lab-specific gene expression signatures in pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[70] David A. Orlando,et al. Mediator and Cohesin Connect Gene Expression and Chromatin Architecture , 2010, Nature.
[71] K. Hochedlinger,et al. Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.
[72] Shinsuke Yuasa,et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human terminally differentiated circulating T cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[73] Jialiang Liang,et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[74] J. Wrana,et al. Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[75] Martin J. Aryee,et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.
[76] Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,et al. Chromatin-Remodeling Components of the BAF Complex Facilitate Reprogramming , 2010, Cell.
[77] H. Blau,et al. Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches , 2010, Nature.
[78] Tomohiro Kono,et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.
[79] Jennifer A. Erwin,et al. Derivation of Pre-X Inactivation Human Embryonic Stem Cells under Physiological Oxygen Concentrations , 2010, Cell.
[80] Zachary D. Smith,et al. Dynamic single-cell imaging of direct reprogramming reveals an early specifying event , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.
[81] Qi Zhou,et al. Production of mice using iPS cells and tetraploid complementation , 2010, Nature Protocols.
[82] Mikael Huss,et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. , 2010, Developmental cell.
[83] Christopher B. Burge,et al. c-Myc Regulates Transcriptional Pause Release , 2010, Cell.
[84] H. Redl,et al. Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[85] Ryoko Araki,et al. Conversion of Ancestral Fibroblasts to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2009, Stem cells.
[86] Martin J Aryee,et al. Differential methylation of tissue- and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts , 2009, Nature Genetics.
[87] David R. Liu,et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of tgf-Beta signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. , 2009, Cell stem cell.
[88] K. Hochedlinger,et al. Tgfβ Signal Inhibition Cooperates in the Induction of iPSCs and Replaces Sox2 and cMyc , 2009, Current Biology.
[89] Jeroen S. van Zon,et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration , 2009, Nature.
[90] Shaorong Gao,et al. Cell Stem Cell Brief Report Ips Cells Can Support Full-term Development of Tetraploid Blastocyst-complemented Embryos Cell Stem Cell Brief Report , 2022 .
[91] Qi Zhou,et al. iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation , 2009, Nature.
[92] A. Hoffmann,et al. A Unifying Model for the Selective Regulation of Inducible Transcription by CpG Islands and Nucleosome Remodeling , 2009, Cell.
[93] Shinya Yamanaka,et al. Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation , 2009, Nature.
[94] Mike J. Mason,et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. , 2009, Cell stem cell.
[95] Benoit G. Bruneau,et al. Directed transdifferentiation of mouse mesoderm to heart tissue by defined factors , 2009, Nature.
[96] Irving L. Weissman,et al. Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells , 2009, Nature.
[97] G. Lewin,et al. Supplemental Figure S1 , 2021 .
[98] Mike J. Mason,et al. Role of the Murine Reprogramming Factors in the Induction of Pluripotency , 2009, Cell.
[99] L. Penn,et al. Reflecting on 25 years with MYC , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[100] R. Eisenman,et al. Myc's broad reach. , 2008, Genes & development.
[101] Jennifer Nichols,et al. Promotion of Reprogramming to Ground State Pluripotency by Signal Inhibition , 2008, PLoS biology.
[102] Scott A. Rifkin,et al. Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes , 2008, Nature Methods.
[103] Clifford A. Meyer,et al. Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.
[104] Takashi Aoi,et al. Generation of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Mouse Liver and Stomach Cells , 2008, Science.
[105] T. Mikkelsen,et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis , 2008, Nature.
[106] Wenjun Guo,et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[107] C. Lengner,et al. Direct Reprogramming of Terminally Differentiated Mature B Lymphocytes to Pluripotency , 2008, Cell.
[108] K. Hochedlinger,et al. Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. , 2008, Cell stem cell.
[109] R. Young,et al. Stem Cells, the Molecular Circuitry of Pluripotency and Nuclear Reprogramming , 2008, Cell.
[110] Marius Wernig,et al. c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2008, Cell stem cell.
[111] Marius Wernig,et al. Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[112] J. Utikal,et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. , 2007, Cell stem cell.
[113] E. Lander,et al. The Mammalian Epigenome , 2007, Cell.
[114] S. Nishikawa,et al. Equivalency of Nuclear Transfer‐Derived Embryonic Stem Cells to Those Derived from Fertilized Mouse Blastocysts , 2006, Stem cells.
[115] S. Yamanaka,et al. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.
[116] R. Jaenisch,et al. ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[117] Megan F. Cole,et al. Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.
[118] R. Medema,et al. Myc‐induced proliferation and transformation require Akt‐mediated phosphorylation of FoxO proteins , 2004, The EMBO journal.
[119] G. Schotta,et al. SU(VAR)3-9 is a Conserved Key Function in Heterochromatic Gene Silencing , 2003, Genetica.
[120] R. Jaenisch,et al. Monoclonal mice generated by nuclear transfer from mature B and T donor cells , 2002, Nature.
[121] P. Farnham,et al. c-Myc Mediates Activation of the cad Promoter via a Post-RNA Polymerase II Recruitment Mechanism* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[122] E. Pennisi,et al. Will Dolly Send in the Clones? , 1997, Science.
[123] J. Gurdon,et al. Efficiencies and mechanisms of nuclear reprogramming. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.
[124] Takashi Aoi,et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[125] G. Galbraith,et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state , 2008 .
[126] B. Thiers. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2008 .
[127] T. Misteli,et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. , 2006, Developmental cell.
[128] R. Eisenman,et al. Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. , 1991, Science.