Peer-Perceived Admiration and Social Preference: Contextual Correlates of Positive Peer Regard Among Suburban and Urban Adolescents.

The primary purpose of this study was to understand further the heterogeneity of popularity, by exploring contextual correlates of two dimensions of positive peer regard among seventh graders within two highly disparate sociodemographic groups: affluent suburban and low-income urban (N = 636). Three sets of attributes were examined, all consistently linked to social status in past research: rebellious behaviors (aggression, academic disengagement, delinquency, and substance use), academic application (effort at school and good grades), and physical attributes (attractiveness and athletic ability). The data provide empirical validation for the conceptual distinctions among peer-perceived admiration and social preference with adolescents from diverse contexts. More specifically, results showed that within each socioeconomic context (a) some forms of rebellious behaviors are clearly admired, (b) prosocial attributes are linked with peer-perceived admiration and social preference, (c) physical attractiveness and athletic skills are important for positive peer regard, the former particularly for suburban girls and the latter for suburban boys, and (d) aggression elicits admiration among early adolescents, but can also generate their disdain (i.e., lowered social preference). In the urban context, results provided evidence for the salience of distinct forms of rebellious and achievement oriented behaviors among different racial/ethnic groups as well.

[1]  J. Ludwig,et al.  The Burden of “Acting White”: Do Black Adolescents Disparage Academic Achievement? , 2008 .

[2]  Amanda J. Rose,et al.  Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[3]  D. Cohen,et al.  After school activities, overweight, and obesity among inner city youth. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[4]  A. Sameroff,et al.  Academic growth curve trajectories from 1st grade to 12th grade: effects of multiple social risk factors and preschool child factors. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[5]  Lei Chang,et al.  The peer group as a context: mediating and moderating effects on relations between academic achievement and social functioning in Chinese children. , 2003, Child development.

[6]  R. Striegel-Moore,et al.  The role of body dissatisfaction as a risk factor for depression in adolescent girls: are the differences Black and White? , 2002, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[7]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[8]  Suniya S Luthar,et al.  Adolescent risk: the costs of affluence. , 2002, New directions for youth development.

[9]  S. Graham,et al.  Ethnicity, Peer Harassment, and Adjustment in Middle School: , 2002 .

[10]  Rutger C. M. E. Engels,et al.  Influences of Risk Behaviors on the Quality of Peer Relations in Adolescence , 2001 .

[11]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Peer Experience: Common and Unique Features of Number of Friendships, Social Network Centrality, and Sociometric Status , 2001 .

[12]  J. Stoltzfus,et al.  Identity and School Adjustment: Revisiting the "Acting White" Assumption , 2001 .

[13]  R. Jessor.  New Perspectives on Adolescent Risk Behavior , 2000, Behaviour Change.

[14]  Kenneth W Griffin,et al.  Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. , 2000, Addictive behaviors.

[15]  R. Terry,et al.  Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. , 2000, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[16]  Linda Grant,et al.  :Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity , 2000 .

[17]  S. Luthar,et al.  Contextual factors in substance use: A study of suburban and inner-city adolescents , 1999, Development and Psychopathology.

[18]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's Interpersonal Perceptions as a Function of Sociometric and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1999 .

[19]  S. Luthar.  Poverty and Children′s Adjustment , 1999 .

[20]  S. Graham,et al.  Exploring Achievement Values Among Ethnic Minority Early Adolescents , 1998 .

[21]  J. Benenson,et al.  The organization of children's same-sex peer relationships. , 1998, New directions for child development.

[22]  C. Boyatzis,et al.  Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic success on early adolescent peer popularity. , 1998, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[23]  Douglas B. Downey,et al.  ASSESSING THE OPPOSITIONAL CULTURE EXPLANATION FOR RACIAL/ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SCHOOL PERFORMANCE* , 1998 .

[24]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Studying Minority Adolescents : Conceptual, Methodological, and Theoretical Issues , 1998 .

[25]  K. Wentzel.  Social Relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers , 1998 .

[26]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[27]  J. Osborne.  Race and Academic Disidentification , 1997 .

[28]  Min Zhou,et al.  GROWING UP AMERICAN: The Challenge Confronting Immigrant Children and Children of Immigrants , 1997 .

[29]  D. Merten.  The Meaning of Meanness: Popularity, Competition, and Conflict among Junior High School Girls. , 1997 .

[30]  A. Fuligni.  The academic achievement of adolescents from immigrant families: the roles of family background, attitudes, and behavior. , 1997, Child development.

[31]  S. Luthar,et al.  Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates , 1996 .

[32]  G. Weisfeld,et al.  Correlates of Social Status among Chinese Adolescents , 1996 .

[33]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  S. Luthar.  Social competence in the school setting: prospective cross-domain associations among inner-city teens. , 1995, Child development.

[35]  E. Kennedy.  Correlates of Perceived Popularity among Peers: A Study of Race and Gender Differences among Middle School Students. , 1995 .

[36]  T. Moffitt.  Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. , 1993, Psychological review.

[37]  K. Winters,et al.  Extent of Drug Abuse among Juvenile Offenders , 1993 .

[38]  C. Goodenow,et al.  The Relationship of School Belonging and Friends' Values to Academic Motivation Among Urban Adolescent Students , 1993 .

[39]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[40]  W R Hammond,et al.  Psychology's role in the public health response to assaultive violence among young African-American men. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[41]  B. B. Brown,et al.  Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement. An ecological perspective. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[42]  Jerald G. Bachman,et al.  Explaining Racial/Ethnic Differences in Adolescent Drug Use: The Impact of Background and Lifestyle , 1991 .

[43]  Scott Menard,et al.  Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems , 1991 .

[44]  J. Macleod.  Bridging Street and School , 1991 .

[45]  J. Kennedy.  Determinants of peer social status: Contributions of physical appearance, reputation, and behavior , 1990, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[46]  R. Whitworth,et al.  Comparison of Hispanic and Anglo Graduate Record Examination Scores and Academic Performance , 1990 .

[47]  S. Fordham,et al.  Black students' school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’” , 1986 .

[48]  Ann S. Masten,et al.  A revised class play method of peer assessment. , 1985 .

[49]  G. Weisfeld,et al.  Possible Determinants of Social Dominance among Adolescent Girls , 1984 .

[50]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[51]  A. Cillessen,et al.  From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. , 2004, Child development.

[52]  S. Luthar,et al.  The high price of affluence. , 2004, Advances in child development and behavior.

[53]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Age and Ethnic Variations in Family Process Mediators of SES , 2003 .

[54]  Suniya S Luthar,et al.  Privileged but pressured? A study of affluent youth. , 2002, Child development.

[55]  J. Axelrod,et al.  Children's Social Constructions of Popularity , 2002 .

[56]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  The Development and Consequences of Stereotype Vulnerability in Adolescents. , 2002 .

[57]  T. Farmer,et al.  Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[58]  Robert L. Crosnoe.  Friendships in Childhood and Adolescence: The Life Course and New Directions* , 2000 .

[59]  S. Luthar,et al.  Adolescent wellness: In the eye of the beholder? , 2000 .

[60]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  The promotion of wellness in children and adolescents. , 2000 .

[61]  K. Dodge,et al.  The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. , 1999, Child development.

[62]  A. Masten,et al.  The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments. Lessons from research on successful children. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[63]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. , 1998 .

[64]  R. Jessor,et al.  New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior: Author index , 1998 .

[65]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[66]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Children's peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  J. Coie,et al.  The role of social context in the prevention of conduct disorder , 1993, Development and Psychopathology.

[68]  B. B. Brown,et al.  Peer groups and peer cultures. , 1990 .

[69]  Franklyn W. Dunford,et al.  The identification and prediction of career offenders utilizing self-reported and official data. , 1987 .

[70]  G. Weisfeld.  A Factor Analytic Study of Peer-Perceived Dominance in Adolescent Boys. , 1983 .

[71]  J. Bachman.  Monitoring the Future: Questionnaire Responses from the Nation's High School Seniors, 1980. , 1980 .