Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study

Abstract Background Glioma interventional studies should collect data aligned with patient priorities, enabling treatment benefit assessment and informed decision-making. This requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis, and reporting. Development of a core outcome set (COS) may contribute to a solution. Methods A 5-stage process was used to develop a COS for glioma trials from the UK perspective. Outcome lists were generated in stages 1: a trial registry review and systematic review of qualitative studies and 2: interviews with glioma patients and caregivers. In stage 3, the outcome lists were de-duplicated with accessible terminology, in stage 4 outcomes were rated via a 2-round Delphi process, and stage 5 comprised a consensus meeting to finalize the COS. Patient-reportable COS outcomes were identified. Results In Delphi round 1, 96 participants rated 35 outcomes identified in stages 1 and 2, to which a further 10 were added. Participants (77/96) rated the resulting 45 outcomes in round 2. Of these, 22 outcomes met a priori threshold for inclusion in the COS. After further review, a COS consisting of 19 outcomes grouped into 7 outcome domains (survival, adverse events, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, seizure activity, cognitive function, and physical function) was finalized by 13 participants at the consensus meeting. Conclusions A COS for glioma trials was developed, comprising 7 outcome domains. Additional research will identify appropriate measurement tools and further validate this COS.

[1]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Relationship between RANO-PRO Working Group standardised priority constructs and disease progression among malignant glioma patients: A retrospective cohort study , 2022, EClinicalMedicine.

[2]  F. Mutale Inclusion of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Cancer Clinical Trials: 30 Years After the NIH Revitalization Act, Where Are We? , 2022, Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology.

[3]  P. Kearns,et al.  The Experiences of People With Glioma and Their Caregivers: Living With Uncertainty and Long Term Consequences (COBra Study) , 2022, Neuro-Oncology.

[4]  P. Kearns,et al.  Core outcomes in Brain Tumour Trials – The COBra Study Review of Glioma Trial Registration Data , 2022, Neuro-Oncology.

[5]  P. Kearns,et al.  Development of a core outcome set and identification of patient-reportable outcomes for primary brain tumour trials: protocol for the COBra study , 2022, BMJ Open.

[6]  T. Santarius,et al.  Development of ‘Core Outcome Sets’ for Meningioma in Clinical Studies (The COSMIC Project): protocol for two systematic literature reviews, eDelphi surveys and online consensus meetings , 2022, BMJ Open.

[7]  R. Stupp,et al.  Factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) deterioration in glioma patients during the progression-free survival period , 2021, Neuro-oncology.

[8]  E. Basch,et al.  SPIRIT-PRO Extension explanation and elaboration: guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in protocols of clinical trials , 2021, BMJ Open.

[9]  L. Minasian,et al.  Underreporting of symptomatic adverse events in phase I clinical trials. , 2021, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Systematic review on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in brain tumor studies: part of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) initiative. , 2021, Neuro-oncology practice.

[11]  F. Ducray,et al.  Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting according to the CONSORT statement in randomized controlled trials with glioblastoma patients. , 2020, Neuro-oncology practice.

[12]  A. V. van Deursen Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19–Related Internet Uses and Outcomes Among the General Population , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Glioma patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical care and research: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology collaborative report. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  D. French,et al.  Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis , 2020 .

[15]  J. Carr,et al.  Registry , 2019, Definitions.

[16]  M. Wood,et al.  Applications of molecular neuro-oncology - a review of diffuse glioma integrated diagnosis and emerging molecular entities , 2019, Diagnostic Pathology.

[17]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  Adult Glioma Incidence and Survival by Race or Ethnicity in the United States From 2000 to 2014 , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[18]  A. Chan,et al.  Association of Trial Registration With Reporting of Primary Outcomes in Protocols and Publications , 2017, JAMA.

[19]  Jane M Blazeby,et al.  Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations , 2017, PLoS medicine.

[20]  J. Sim,et al.  Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization , 2017, Quality & Quantity.

[21]  D G Altman,et al.  GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[22]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Quality of survival: a new concept framework to assess the quality of prolonged life in cancer , 2017 .

[23]  Angus G K McNair,et al.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 , 2017, Trials.

[24]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[25]  B. Young,et al.  Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates , 2016, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[26]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[27]  Robert J Williams,et al.  Mental Capacity Act. , 2016, Nursing management.

[28]  Martha Donoghue,et al.  Focusing on Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Symptomatic Adverse Events, Physical Function, and Disease-Related Symptoms , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[30]  A. Gnanasakthy,et al.  Inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in registered clinical trials: Evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov (2007-2013). , 2015, Contemporary clinical trials.

[31]  A. Gnanasakthy,et al.  Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures In Registered Clinical Trials: Evidence From Clinicaltrials.Gov (2007-2013) , 2015 .

[32]  Liying Zhang,et al.  Psychometric validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy—brain (FACT-Br) for assessing quality of life in patients with brain metastases , 2014, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[33]  Roderik F. Viergever,et al.  The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials: Still a Problem , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Characteristics of oncology clinical trials: insights from a systematic analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[35]  R. Jenkins,et al.  Genetics of adult glioma. , 2012, Cancer genetics.

[36]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[37]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[38]  D. Osoba,et al.  An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[39]  Bernhard Holzner,et al.  Implementation of computer-based quality-of-life monitoring in brain tumor outpatients in routine clinical practice. , 2010, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[40]  Alexia Iasonos,et al.  Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[41]  Serguei V. S. Pakhomov,et al.  Agreement between patient-reported symptoms and their documentation in the medical record. , 2008, The American journal of managed care.

[42]  J. Buckner,et al.  Validation of single-item linear analog scale assessment of quality of life in neuro-oncology patients. , 2007, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[43]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Validation of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) , 2006, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[44]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[45]  Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012 , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[46]  Ruth Williams,et al.  Public involvement. , 2009, Nursing management.