Central Venous Catheter Placement by Advanced Practice Nurses Demonstrates Low Procedural Complication and Infection Rates—A Report From 13 Years of Service*

Objectives:To report procedural characteristics and outcomes from a central venous catheter placement service operated by advanced practice nurses. Design:Single-center observational study. Setting:A tertiary care university hospital in Sydney, Australia. Patients:Adult patients from the general wards and from critical care areas receiving a central venous catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter, high-flow dialysis catheter, or midline catheter for parenteral therapy between November 1996 and December 2009. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:Prevalence rates by indication, site, and catheter type were assessed. Nonparametric tests were used to calculate differences in outcomes for categorical data. Catheter infection rates were determined per 1,000 catheter days after derivation of the denominator. A total of 4,560 catheters were placed in 3,447 patients. The most common catheters inserted were single-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters (n = 1,653; 36.3%) and single-lumen central venous catheters (n = 1,233; 27.0%). A small proportion of high-flow dialysis catheters were also inserted over the reporting period (n = 150; 3.5%). Sixty-one percent of all catheters placed were for antibiotic administration. The median device dwell time (in d) differed across cannulation sites (p < 0.001). Subclavian catheter placement had the longest dwell time with a median of 16 days (interquartile range, 8–26 d). Overall catheter dwell was reported at a cumulative 63,071 catheter days. The overall catheter-related bloodstream infection rate was 0.2 per 1,000 catheter days. The prevalence rate of pneumothorax recorded was 0.4%, and accidental arterial puncture (simple puncture—with no dilation or cannulation) was 1.3% using the subclavian vein. Conclusions:This report has demonstrated low complication rates for a hospital-wide service delivered by advance practice nurses. The results suggest that a centrally based service with specifically trained operators can be beneficial by potentially improving patient safety and promoting organizational efficiencies.

[1]  Titus L. Daniels,et al.  Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Surveillance outside the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Survey , 2012, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[2]  J. Timsit,et al.  Dressing disruption is a major risk factor for catheter-related infections* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[3]  E. Bouza,et al.  Impact on knowledge and practice of an intervention to control catheter infection in the ICU , 2012, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[4]  Chantal Ferguson,et al.  Aseptic insertion of central venous lines to reduce bacteraemia , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  M. McLaws,et al.  Aseptic insertion of central venous lines to reduce bacteraemia , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6]  Cheryl Herbert,et al.  Trends in central line-associated bloodstream infections in a trauma-surgical intensive care unit. , 2011, Archives of surgery.

[7]  K. Hillman,et al.  Central venous catheter insertion by a clinical nurse consultant or anaesthetic medical staff: a single-centre observational study. , 2010, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[8]  Amber E Barnato,et al.  The effect of multidisciplinary care teams on intensive care unit mortality. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  K. Hillman,et al.  A review of the nursing role in central venous cannulation: implications for practice policy and research. , 2009, Journal of clinical nursing.

[11]  Jesse B. Hall,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial evaluating postinsertion neck ultrasound in peripherally inserted central catheter procedures , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[12]  Margaret A Dudeck,et al.  CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. , 2008, American journal of infection control.

[13]  Dionne A. Graham,et al.  Systematic Intervention to Reduce Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit , 2008, Pediatrics.

[14]  J. Newton,et al.  Central venous catheterization. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  T. Maecken,et al.  Ultrasound imaging in vascular access , 2007, Critical care medicine.

[16]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Influence of Hospital Procedural Volume on Care Process and Mortality for Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation , 2007, Circulation.

[17]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Lawrance,et al.  Nurse-led central venous catheter service: Christie experience. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  C. Earle,et al.  Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Improved care and reduced costs for patients requiring peripherally inserted central catheters: the role of bedside ultrasound and a dedicated team. , 2005, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[21]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[22]  E. DeLong,et al.  Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. , 2004, JAMA.

[23]  J. Casey,et al.  A nurse led central line insertion service. , 2003, EDTNA/ERCA journal.

[24]  Michael K Gould,et al.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  F Golliot,et al.  Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[26]  J. B. Price,et al.  Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines on outcome of infection in patients in the surgical intensive care unit. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[27]  E. DeLong,et al.  Relationship between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome in elderly patients. , 1997, Circulation.

[28]  E. Hannan,et al.  Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. , 1990, JAMA.

[29]  N. Fishman,et al.  Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee , 2012 .

[30]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[31]  K. Hillman,et al.  Establishing a nurse-led central venous catheter insertion service , 2010 .

[32]  G. Scoppettuolo,et al.  The EKG Method for Positioning the Tip of PICCs: Results from Two Preliminary Studies , 2008 .

[33]  Christine L. Naylor.  Reduction of Malposition in Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters With Tip Location System , 2007 .

[34]  V. Falanga,et al.  Implementation of a surveillance program for catheter- related bloodstream infections in a general hospital: results from a single-center experience , 2007 .