Envy-Free Division of Land

Classic cake-cutting algorithms enable people with different preferences to divide among them a heterogeneous resource (``cake''), such that the resulting division is fair according to each agent's individual preferences. However, these algorithms either ignore the geometry of the resource altogether, or assume it is one-dimensional. In practice, it is often required to divide multi-dimensional resources, such as land-estates or advertisement spaces in print or electronic media. In such cases, the geometric shape of the allotted piece is of crucial importance. For example, when building houses or designing advertisements, in order to be useful, the allotments should be squares or rectangles with bounded aspect-ratio. We thus introduce the problem of fair land division --- fair division of a multi-dimensional resource wherein the allocated piece must have a pre-specified geometric shape. We present constructive division algorithms that satisfy the two most prominent fairness criteria, namely envy-freeness and proportionality. In settings where proportionality cannot be achieved due to the geometric constraints, our algorithms provide a partially-proportional division, guaranteeing that the fraction allocated to each agent be at least a certain positive constant. We prove that in many natural settings the envy-freeness requirement is compatible with the best attainable partial-proportionality.

[1]  Hans Reijnierse,et al.  On finding an envy-free Pareto-optimal division , 1998, Math. Program..

[2]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Cake division with minimal cuts: envy-free procedures for three persons, four persons, and beyond , 2004, Math. Soc. Sci..

[3]  Antonio Nicolò,et al.  Efficient egalitarian equivalent allocations over a single good , 2009 .

[4]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  Redividing the cake , 2016, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[5]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  Monotonicity and competitive equilibrium in cake-cutting , 2015 .

[6]  William A. Webb A Combinatorial Algorithm to Establish a Fair Border , 1990, Eur. J. Comb..

[7]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Fair division - from cake-cutting to dispute resolution , 1998 .

[8]  W. Thomson,et al.  On the fair division of a heterogeneous commodity , 1992 .

[9]  Eran Shmaya,et al.  Rental harmony with roommates , 2014, J. Econ. Theory.

[10]  Marcus Berliant,et al.  A foundation of location theory: existence of equilibrium, the welfare theorems, and core , 2004 .

[11]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  APPLIED MATHEMATICS WORKING PAPER SERIESHOW TO CUT A PIZZA FAIRLY: , 2002 .

[12]  Walter Stromquist,et al.  Envy-Free Cake Divisions Cannot be Found by Finite Protocols , 2008, Electron. J. Comb..

[13]  D. Weller,et al.  Fair division of a measurable space , 1985 .

[14]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  Envy-Free Cake-Cutting in Two Dimensions , 2016, ArXiv.

[15]  Stef Tijs,et al.  Economies with Land—A Game Theoretical Approach , 1994 .

[16]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  Waste Makes Haste , 2015, ACM Trans. Algorithms.

[17]  Christopher P. Chambers Allocation rules for land division , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[18]  Ariel D. Procaccia Cake Cutting Algorithms , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[19]  Xiaotie Deng,et al.  Algorithmic Solutions for Envy-Free Cake Cutting , 2012, Oper. Res..

[20]  Ying Wang,et al.  Cutting a Cake for Five People , 2009, AAIM.

[21]  Jack M. Robertson,et al.  Cake-cutting algorithms - be fair if you can , 1998 .

[22]  Yan Yu,et al.  Strategic divide and choose , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  Farhad Hüsseinov,et al.  A theory of a heterogeneous divisible commodity exchange economy , 2011 .

[24]  Anatole Beck,et al.  Constructing a fair border , 1987 .

[25]  SU Francisedward RENTAL HARMONY : SPERNER ’ S LEMMA IN FAIR DIVISION , 2000 .

[26]  Xiaohui Bei,et al.  Truthful fair division without free disposal , 2018, Social Choice and Welfare.

[27]  Tatsuro Ichiishi,et al.  Equitable allocation of divisible goods , 1999 .

[28]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  Fair and Square: Cake-Cutting in Two Dimensions , 2014, ArXiv.

[29]  Rishi S. Mirchandani Superadditivity and Subadditivity in Fair Division , 2013 .

[30]  Tatsuaki Okamoto,et al.  Meta-Envy-Free Cake-Cutting Protocols , 2010, MFCS.

[31]  Matthew J. Kaltz 3-D vertical ray shooting and 2-D point enclosure, range searching, and arc shooting amidst convex fat objects , 1997 .

[32]  Haris Aziz,et al.  A Discrete and Bounded Envy-Free Cake Cutting Protocol for Any Number of Agents , 2016, 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[33]  William S. Zwicker,et al.  A Moving-Knife Solution to the Four-Person Envy-Free Cake-Division Problem , 1995 .

[34]  Marcus Berliant,et al.  A foundation of location theory: Consumer preferences and demand , 1988 .

[35]  Walter Stromquist,et al.  Cutting a Pie Is Not a Piece of Cake , 2008, Am. Math. Mon..

[36]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  How to Cut a Cake Before the Party Ends , 2013, AAAI.

[37]  Matthew J. Katz 3-D Vertical Ray Shooting and 2-D Point Enclosure, Range Searching, and Arc Shooting Amidst Convex Fat Objects , 1997, Comput. Geom..

[38]  T. Hill Determining a Fair Border , 1983 .

[39]  Micha Sharir,et al.  Computing Depth Orders for Fat Objects and Related Problems , 1995, Comput. Geom..

[40]  Milan Vlach,et al.  Equity and efficiency in a measure space with nonadditive preferences : the problems of cake division , 2005 .

[41]  W. Stromquist How to Cut a Cake Fairly , 1980 .

[42]  Farhad Hüsseinov,et al.  Existence of efficient envy-free allocations of a heterogeneous divisible commodity with nonadditive utilities , 2013, Social Choice and Welfare.

[43]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Optimal Envy-Free Cake Cutting , 2011, AAAI.

[44]  Antonio Nicolò,et al.  Equal opportunity equivalence in land division , 2012 .

[45]  Michael N. Huhns,et al.  A Procedure for the Allocation of Two-Dimensional Resources in a Multiagent System , 2009, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[46]  W. Thomson Children Crying at Birthday Parties. Why? , 2007 .