Special Session: Building Intentional Community Partnerships

Recent growth in community engagement programs in engineering education reveals the importance of partnerships and community; however, there has been minimal research and reflection on how to design community engagement programs to represent the needs and rights of the community. This interactive special session addresses this gap by challenging participants to learn and critically think about the communities they are serving. This paper outlines the theoretical foundations for this workshop, with an overview of two publications: one that categorizes the way engineers work with the people they serve either as clients, stakeholders, users, or citizens; and the other that categorizes specific interactions, activities, and the language of community engagement partnerships as transactional, cooperative or communal. In addition to the theoretical grounding, the paper also provides a summary of the activities that we will be facilitating during the special session, including analyzing cases and design tools, reflecting on current program structures, and creating an action plan to implement changes in the participants’ current, anticipated, or imagined engagement programs. By the end of the special session, participants will be able to evaluate their past, current or future partnerships, observe how program structures can influence partnerships, and assess the differences that these partnerships can make in the success or failures of community engagement programs. Participants will leave the session with a practical action plan to implement the types of partnerships they wish to build with their community.

[1]  Susan Strasser,et al.  Satisfaction Guaranteed: The Making of the American Mass Market , 1992 .

[2]  P. Laird.  Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing , 1998 .

[3]  Gordon Cunningham,et al.  From clients to citizens : communities changing the course of their own development , 2008 .

[4]  Marybeth Lima.  The LSU Community Playground Project: Reflections on 16 Years of an Engineering Service-Learning Program , 2014 .

[5]  Jeffrey C. Bridger,et al.  Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development , 1999 .

[6]  C. Geertz.  The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[7]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users and non-users matter , 2003 .

[8]  Julia D. Thompson,et al.  Engineering community engagement partnerships: Investigating motivation, nature, and structure , 2015 .

[9]  Juan C. Lucena,et al.  Engineers and Community: How Sustainable Engineering Depends on Engineers’ Views of People , 2013 .

[10]  J.A. Leydens,et al.  Listening as a Missing Dimension in Engineering Education: Implications for Sustainable Community Development Efforts , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[11]  J. Krige.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[12]  A. Bielefeldt,et al.  Measuring The Impacts Of Project Based Service Learning , 2009 .

[13]  Olga Pierrakos,et al.  Workshops for the Engineering Faculty Engagement in Learning Through Service (EFELTS) Project: Development and Initial Findings , 2013 .

[14]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Measuring the life-cycle value of enduring systems , 2008 .

[15]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  How Users Matter. The Co-construction of Technologies and Users , 2003 .

[16]  Bowa George Tucker,et al.  Faculty Perspectives on Service-Learning in Engineering Education: Chal- lenges and Opportunities , 2013 .

[17]  Thierry Bardini,et al.  The Social Construction of the Personal Computer User , 1995 .

[18]  Keith Morton,et al.  The Irony of Service: Charity, Project and Social Change in Service-Learning , 1995 .

[19]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Measuring the life-cycle value of enduring systems , 2008, Syst. Eng..

[20]  Silvia Dorado,et al.  Service-Learning Partnerships: Paths of Engagement. , 2004 .

[21]  N. Feinstein,et al.  Science for what public? Addressing equity in American science museums and science centers , 2014 .

[22]  L. Vanasupa,et al.  Relational versus Transactional Community Engagement: An Experience of the Benefits and Costs , 2014 .