ASCAT wind quality under high subcell wind variability conditions

The assessment and validation of the quality of satellite scatterometer vector winds is challenging under increased subcell wind variability conditions, since reference wind sources such as buoy winds or model output represent very different spatial scales from those resolved by scatterometers (i.e., increased representativeness error). In this paper, moored buoy wind time series are used to assess the correlation between subcell wind variability and several Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT)-derived parameters, such as the wind-inversion residual, the backscatter measurement variability factor, and the singularity exponents derived from an image processing technique, called singularity analysis. It is proven that all three ASCAT parameters are sensitive to the subcell wind variability and complementary in flagging the most variable winds, which is useful for further application. A triple collocation (TC) analysis of ASCAT, buoy, and the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) model output is then performed to assess the quality of each wind data source under different variability conditions. A novel approach is used to compute the representativeness errors, a key ingredient for the TC analysis. The experimental results show that the estimated errors of each wind source increase as the subcell wind variability increases. When temporally averaged buoy winds are used instead of 10 min buoy winds, the TC analysis results in smaller buoy wind errors (notably at increased wind variability conditions) while ASCAT and ECMWF errors do not significantly change, further validating the proposed TC approach. It is concluded that at 25 km resolution, ASCAT provides the best quality winds in general.

[1]  W. Liu,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of Air-Sea Exchanges of Heat and Water Vapor Including the Molecular Constraints at the Interface , 1979 .

[2]  A. Stoffelen Toward the true near-surface wind speed: Error modeling and calibration using triple collocation , 1998 .

[3]  Ad Stoffelen,et al.  Spatial variances of wind fields and their relation to second-order structure functions and spectra , 2014 .

[4]  R. J. Yamartino,et al.  A Comparison of Several `Single-Pass' Estimators of the Standard Deviation of Wind Direction. , 1984 .

[5]  W. Pierson,et al.  Correction to “Probabilities and statistics for backscatter estimates obtained by a scatterometer” , 1990 .

[6]  Mark A. Bourassa,et al.  Quantifying variance due to temporal and spatial difference between ship and satellite winds , 2011 .

[7]  W. Pierson,et al.  Probabilities and statistics for backscatter estimates obtained by a scatterometer with applications to new scatterometer design data , 1989 .

[8]  Oriol Pont,et al.  An Optimized Algorithm for the Evaluation of Local Singularity Exponents in Digital Signals , 2011, IWCIA.

[9]  Hans Bonekamp,et al.  Analysis of ASCAT Ocean Backscatter Measurement Noise , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Fuk-kwok Li,et al.  Radar Backscatter Measurement Accuracies Using Digital Doppler Processors in Spaceborne Scatterometers , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Wenming Lin,et al.  Rain Identification in ASCAT Winds Using Singularity Analysis , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[12]  Marcos Portabella,et al.  Scatterometer Backscatter Uncertainty Due to Wind Variability , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Wenming Lin,et al.  ASCAT Wind Quality Control Near Rain , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  A. Stoffelen,et al.  On the quality of high‐resolution scatterometer winds , 2011 .

[15]  P. Farrugia,et al.  Comparative analysis of estimators for wind direction standard deviation , 2006 .

[16]  Wenming Lin,et al.  Rain Effects on ASCAT-Retrieved Winds: Toward an Improved Quality Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Antonio Turiel,et al.  Microcanonical multifractal formalism—a geometrical approach to multifractal systems: Part I. Singularity analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Marcos Portabella,et al.  A New Method for Improving Scatterometer Wind Quality Control , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[19]  Marcos Portabella,et al.  CMOD5.n - the CMOD5 GMF for neutral winds , 2008 .

[20]  Michael H. Freilich,et al.  The accuracy of the NSCAT 1 vector winds: Comparisons with National Data Buoy Center buoys , 1999 .

[21]  David L. T. Anderson,et al.  Scatterometer Data Interpretation: Measurement Space and Inversion , 1997 .

[22]  S. Grossmann The Spectrum of Turbulence , 2003 .