Influence of nanoporous alumina membranes on long-term osteoblast response.

A major goal of bone tissue engineering is to design better scaffold configuration and materials to better control osteoblast behavior. Nanoporous architecture has been shown to significantly affect cellular response. In this work, nanoporous alumina membranes were fabricated by a two-step anodization method to investigate bone cell response. Osteoblasts were seeded on nanoporous alumina membranes to investigate both short-term adhesion and proliferation and long-term functionality and matrix production. Cell adhesion and proliferation were characterized using a standard MTT assay and cell counting. The total protein content was measured after cell lysis using the BCA assay. Matrix production was characterized in terms of surface concentrations of calcium and phosphorous, components of bone matrix, using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results from nanoporous alumina membranes were compared with those of amorphous alumina, aluminum, commercially available ANOPORE and glass. Results indicate improved osteoblast adhesion and proliferation and increased matrix production after 4 weeks of study.

[1]  P. Wilshaw,et al.  Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[2]  T. Spelsberg,et al.  Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes. III. Effect of poly(L-lactide) membrane pore size on the bone healing process in large defects. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  K. Burg,et al.  Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[5]  C. Grimes,et al.  Controlled Molecular Release Using Nanoporous Alumina Capsules , 2003 .

[6]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Peptide-immobilized nanoporous alumina membranes for enhanced osteoblast adhesion. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[7]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[8]  G. B. Stark,et al.  Tissue engineering of bone , 2002, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[9]  T. Webster,et al.  Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[10]  R. Bizios,et al.  Mini‐review: Proactive biomaterials and bone tissue engineering , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Thomas J. Webster,et al.  Nano-biotechnology: carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants , 2004, Nanotechnology.

[12]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nanobiotechnology: implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications , 2004, Expert review of medical devices.