Towards sustainable livestock production systems - outline of a Learning and Experimentation Strategy (LES).

Wageningen UR Livestock Research, boelie.elzen@wur.nl, sierk.spoelstra@wur.nl Abstract: Over the past decade, the Dutch Government has increasingly emphasised the need for integral solutions for sustainability problems in the livestock production sector. This led to the adoption of research approaches in line with transition management and system innovation that had been developed in other domains. In 2008, the government set further policy targets of 5% and 100% sustainable livestock production at the farm level for 2011 and 2023 respectively. Policy measures included stimulation of sector initiatives for sustainable agriculture (sectoral innovation agendas) and demand for projects with a focus on system innovation. Two broad approaches may contribute to the realization of these targets, notably top down and bottom up. Top down approaches are usually research‐led and characterized by the formulation of visions of future livestock production systems. At the same time a broad variety of bottom up initiatives is taken by farmers who develop and try out new approaches to meet the challenges as they see them. Currently, the links between the bottom up and the top down processes are relatively weak. As both may contribute to a system innovation, a major challenge is to make a fruitful combination between the two approaches. To this end we have developed what we call a “Learning and Experimentation Strategy” (LES) that we will elaborate in the paper.

[1]  John Grin,et al.  “Doing” Reflexive Modernization in Pig Husbandry , 2008 .

[2]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Anchorage of Innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to use the greenhouse effect as an energy source , 2008 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[4]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Dealing with incumbent regimes: Deliberateness and serendipity of innovation agency , 2010 .

[5]  Johannes S. C. Wiskerke,et al.  Seeds of transition: essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture. , 2004 .

[6]  Jaco Quist,et al.  Backcasting for a Sustainable Future: The Impact After 10 Years , 2007 .

[7]  D. Roep,et al.  Managing technical-institutional design processes: some strategic lessons from environmental co-operatives in the Netherlands , 2003 .

[8]  A. P. Bos,et al.  Designing complex and sustainable agricultural production systems: an integrated and reflexive approach for the case of table egg production in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[9]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Socio-Technological Regimes and Transition Contexts , 2004 .

[10]  Leo Jansen,et al.  Sustainable Technology Development , 2000 .

[11]  Johannes S. C. Wiskerke,et al.  Nourishing networks : Fourteen lessons about creating sustainable food supply chains , 2006 .

[12]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[13]  J. D. Ploeg,et al.  The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization , 2008 .

[14]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[15]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[16]  I. Darnhofer,et al.  Building sustainable rural futures: the added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty. 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria, 4-7 July 2010. , 2010 .

[17]  D. Loorbach Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[18]  F. Geels Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[19]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological Change , 2019, World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.

[20]  N. Brown,et al.  Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science , 2000 .

[21]  P Ekins,et al.  Human Choice and Climate Change, Volumes 1-4 - Rayner, S. & Malone, E. Eds., Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio (Review) , 1999 .

[22]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[23]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .