QuickNAT: Segmenting MRI Neuroanatomy in 20 seconds

Whole brain segmentation from structural magnetic resonance imaging is a prerequisite for most morphological analyses, but requires hours of processing time and therefore delays the availability of image markers after scan acquisition. We introduce QuickNAT, a fully convolution neural network that segments a brain scan in 20 seconds. To enable training of the complex network with limited annotated data, we propose to pre-train on auxiliary labels created from existing segmentation software and to subsequently fine-tune on manual labels. In an extensive set of evaluations on eight datasets that cover a wide age range, pathology, and different scanners, we demonstrate that QuickNAT achieves superior performance to state-of-the-art methods, while being about 700 times faster. This drastic speed up greatly facilitates the processing of large data repositories and supports the translation of imaging biomarkers by making them almost instantaneously available.

[1]  Christian Wachinger,et al.  DeepNAT: Deep convolutional neural network for segmenting neuroanatomy , 2017, NeuroImage.

[2]  S. Vos,et al.  Reliability of brain volume measurements: A test-retest dataset , 2014, Scientific Data.

[3]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[4]  John G. Csernansky,et al.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Steven C. R. Williams,et al.  A comprehensive testing protocol for MRI neuroanatomical segmentation techniques: Evaluation of a novel lateral ventricle segmentation method , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  MultiCenter Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2012, Brain Connect..

[7]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-atlas segmentation with joint label fusion and corrective learning—an open source implementation , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[8]  T. Bartsch,et al.  The hippocampus in aging and disease: From plasticity to vulnerability , 2015, Neuroscience.

[9]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  Bennett A. Landman,et al.  Formulating Spatially Varying Performance in the Statistical Fusion Framework , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Frazier Jean,et al.  CANDIShare: A Resource for Pediatric Neuroimaging Data , 2010 .

[14]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.