Machine vision-based localization of nucleic and cytoplasmic injection sites on low-contrast adherent cells

Automated robotic bio-micromanipulation can improve the throughput and efficiency of single-cell experiments. Adherent cells, such as fibroblasts, include a wide range of mammalian cells and are usually very thin with highly irregular morphologies. Automated micromanipulation of these cells is a beneficial yet challenging task, where the machine vision sub-task is addressed in this article. The necessary but neglected problem of localizing injection sites on the nucleus and the cytoplasm is defined and a novel two-stage model-based algorithm is proposed. In Stage I, the gradient information associated with the nucleic regions is extracted and used in a mathematical morphology clustering framework to roughly localize the nucleus. Next, this preliminary segmentation information is used to estimate an ellipsoidal model for the nucleic region, which is then used as an attention window in a k-means clustering-based iterative search algorithm for fine localization of the nucleus and nucleic injection site (NIS). In Stage II, a geometrical model is built on each localized nucleus and employed in a new texture-based region-growing technique called Growing Circles Algorithm to localize the cytoplasmic injection site (CIS). The proposed algorithm has been tested on 405 images containing more than 1,000 NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells, and yielded the precision rates of 0.918, 0.943, and 0.866 for the NIS, CIS, and combined NIS–CIS localizations, respectively.

[1]  Jürgen Götz,et al.  Pronuclear injection for the production of transgenic mice , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[2]  K. Laws Textured Image Segmentation , 1980 .

[3]  Rolf Adams,et al.  Seeded Region Growing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Biological Cell Injection Using an Autonomous MicroRobotic System , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  William H. Velander,et al.  Transgenesis in mice by cytoplasmic injection of polylysine/DNA mixtures , 1995, Transgenic Research.

[6]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[7]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[8]  ByoungChul Ko,et al.  Microscopic Cell Nuclei Segmentation Based on Adaptive Attention Window , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Yousef Al-Kofahi,et al.  Improved Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Histopathology Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Pasi Kallio,et al.  Multi-purpose impedance-based measurement system to automate microinjection of adherent cells , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Owe Orwar,et al.  Single-cell electroporation , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[12]  R Yanagimachi,et al.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. , 1995, Biology of reproduction.

[13]  Yi Xing,et al.  The nuclear experience of CPEB: implications for RNA processing and translational control. , 2010, RNA.

[14]  Nikolai Dechev,et al.  Development of an Autonomous Biological Cell Manipulator With Single-Cell Electroporation and Visual Servoing Capabilities , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Christopher E. Hann,et al.  Application of machine vision for automated cell injection , 2009 .

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[17]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  Prabhakar R. Gudla,et al.  A high‐throughput system for segmenting nuclei using multiscale techniques , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[19]  Jack-Gérard Postaire,et al.  Cluster Analysis by Binary Morphology , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Timm Schroeder,et al.  Imaging stem-cell-driven regeneration in mammals , 2008, Nature.