In this paper we introduce a novel model-based reliability analysis methodology to guide the best maintenance practices for the different components in complex engineered systems. We have developed a tool that allows the system designer to explore the consequences of different design choices, and to assess the effects of faults and wear on critical components as a result of usage or age. The tool uses pre-computed simulations of usage scenarios for which performance metrics can be computed as functions of system configurations and faulty/worn components. These simulations make use of damage maps, which estimate component degradation as a function of usage or age. This allows the designer to determine the components and their respective fault modes that are critical w.r.t. the performance requirements of the design. Given a design configuration, the tool is capable of providing a ranked list of critical fault modes and their individual contributions to the likelihood of failing the different performance requirements. From this initial analysis it is possible to determine the components that have little to no effect on the probability of the system meeting its performance requirements. These components are likely candidates for reactive maintenance. Other component faults may affect the performance over the short or long run. Given a limit for allowable failure risk, it is possible to compute the Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) for each of those fault modes. These time intervals, grouped by component or Line Replaceable Units (LRUs), are aggregated to develop a preventive maintenance schedule. The most critical faults may be candidates for ConditionBased Maintenance (CBM). For these cases, the specific fault Bhaskar Saha et. al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. modes considered for CBM also guide sensor selection and placement.
[1]
Tuan Ngoc Pham,et al.
DESIGN FOR MAINTAINABILITY - DFM
,
2009
.
[2]
T. A. Simcik,et al.
Designing for Supportability: Driving Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability In...
,
2012
.
[3]
Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.
A Simulation and Modeling Based Reliability Requirements Assessment Methodology
,
2014
.
[4]
Matthew P. Castanier,et al.
A Simulation and Optimization Methodology for Reliability of Vehicle Fleets
,
2011
.
[5]
Daming Lin,et al.
A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance
,
2006
.
[6]
R. Barlow,et al.
Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies
,
1960
.