What is Technology? Investigating Student Conceptions about the Nature of Technology

The science education literature clearly shows that knowledge of the nature of technology is an educational goal; however there is a lack of research on student conceptions about the nature of technology. To address this gap in the literature, this research began with a thorough review of the literature on scientific and technological literacy, the philosophy of technology, and the history of technology to develop a conceptual framework for the nature of technology. This review of the literature led to the identification of five dimensions of knowledge that completely characterise the nature of technology. Then, the conceptual framework was used to analyse data collected from an exploratory survey distributed to a small group of middle school students. All of the student responses were able to be coded using the conceptual framework; however, the results suggest that the students sampled possess some naïve understandings of the nature of technology.

[1]  Ruth Oldenziel,et al.  Signifying Semantics for a History of Technology , 2006 .

[2]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[3]  Don Ihde,et al.  Technology and the lifeworld , 1990 .

[4]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[5]  R. Scharff,et al.  Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition: An Anthology , 2013 .

[6]  A. Ryan,et al.  The Development of a New Instrument: "Views on Science- Technology-Society" (VOSTS) , 1992 .

[7]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Educating effective engineering designers: the role of reflective practice , 2003 .

[8]  A. M. Breckon Design Technology in the National Curriculum , 2009 .

[9]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[10]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[11]  J. Twyford,et al.  The Formation of Children's Technological Concepts: A Study of What It Means To Do Technology from a Child's Perspective. , 2000 .

[12]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Notes Toward a Philosophy of Meta-Technology , 1995 .

[13]  John Steers,et al.  Design and Technology in the National Curriculum. , 1990 .

[14]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[15]  M Kranzberg,et al.  History of Technology , 1929, Nature.

[16]  C. Schunn,et al.  Engagement and Achievements: A Case Study of Design-Based Learning in a Science Context. , 2008 .

[17]  Brent Mawson,et al.  Children’s developing understanding of technology , 2010 .

[18]  José Antonio Méndez Sanz,et al.  Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy , 1995 .

[19]  M. Bers Identity Construction Environments: Developing Personal and Moral Values Through the Design of a Virtual City , 2001 .

[20]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy by Carl Mitcham (review) , 1995, Technology and Culture.

[21]  S. Norris Scientific Myth-Conceptions , 2003 .

[22]  Alister Jones Relationship between science and technology in the New Zealand curriculum , 1997 .

[23]  R. Hackett Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[24]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[25]  John B. Horrigan,et al.  A Typology of Information and Communication Technology Users , 2007 .

[26]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence Related to Awareness, Adoption, and Implementation of the Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. , 2005 .

[27]  Douglas Allchin,et al.  Pseudohistory and Pseudoscience , 2004 .

[28]  Angela Anning,et al.  Comparisons and Contrasts Between Elementary/Primary ’School Situated Design’ and ’Workplace Design’ in Canada and England , 2001 .

[29]  L. Winner Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought , 1977 .

[30]  L. Jackson Science, Technology and Society , 1967, Nature.

[31]  Kimberly A. Patton Teens and Technology , 2011 .

[32]  Koichi Kitazawa,et al.  Science and Technology for Society , 2006 .

[33]  Dan L. Householder,et al.  Perceptions of technological competencies in elementary technology education , 1995 .

[34]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[35]  E. Schatzberg Technik Comes to America: Changing Meanings of Technology before 1930 , 2006 .

[36]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[37]  J. Confrey A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming , 1990 .

[38]  S. Hinduja Trends and patterns among online software pirates , 2003, Ethics and Information Technology.

[39]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 2002 .

[40]  Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education Change: Connections to Adult Learning and Education the Adult Learning and Education Connection , 2000 .

[41]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[42]  渋江 靖弘,et al.  Science for All Americans , 1990 .

[43]  R. Yager Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education. , 1996 .

[44]  Joseph C. Pitt,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology , 1999 .

[45]  Vincent F. Hendricks,et al.  A Companion to Philosophy of Technology , 2009 .

[46]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[47]  John S. Gero,et al.  The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers , 2002 .

[48]  H. Jonas,et al.  Toward a philosophy of technology. , 1979, The Hastings Center report.

[49]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Chapter 1: A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming , 1990 .

[50]  Greg Pearson,et al.  Tech tally : approaches to assessing technological literacy , 2006 .