Congestion management by optimising FACTS device location

FACTS devices such as thyristor controlled series compensators and thyristor controlled phase angle regulators, by controlling the power flows in the network, can help to reduce the flows in heavily loaded lines resulting in an increased loadability of the network and reduced cost of production. Congestion management using FACTS devices requires a two step approach. First, the optimal location of these devices in the network must be ascertained and then, the settings of their control parameters optimised. This paper presents the development of simple and efficient models for optimal location of FACTS devices that can be used for congestion management by controlling their parameters optimally. Three different objectives have been considered and the results are compared. The effectiveness of the purposed methods is demonstrated on a 5-bus system and a 75-bus Indian system.

[1]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Unified power-flow control concept for flexible AC transmission systems , 1992 .

[2]  Garng M. Huang,et al.  Fast textured algorithms for optimal power delivery problems in deregulated environments , 1998 .

[3]  Boon-Teck Ooi,et al.  Assessment and control of the impact of FACTS devices on power system performance , 1996 .

[4]  S. C. Srivastava,et al.  Optimal reactive power dispatch considering FACTS devices , 1997 .

[5]  Tjing T. Lie,et al.  Optimal flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) devices allocation , 1997 .

[6]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[7]  N.G. Hingorani,et al.  Flexible AC transmission , 1993, IEEE Spectrum.

[8]  S. L. Nilsson,et al.  Benefits of GTO-based compensation systems for electric utility applications , 1992 .

[9]  J Y Liu,et al.  Comparison Studies of Unified Power Flow Controllers with Static Var Compensators and Phase Shifters , 1999 .

[10]  S. C. Srivastava,et al.  Corrective action planning to achieve a feasible optimal power flow solution , 1995 .

[11]  S. Jalali,et al.  Determination of location and amount of series compensation to increase power transfer capability , 1998 .

[12]  Jizhong Zhu,et al.  A new approach to optimal power flow with phase shifter , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[13]  Jiali He,et al.  Allocation and control of FACTS devices for steady-state stability enhancement of large-scale power system , 1998, POWERCON '98. 1998 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX151).

[14]  G. Ejebe,et al.  Automatic Contingency Selection , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[15]  A. Yokoyama,et al.  Optimal location of phase shifters in the French network by genetic algorithm , 1999 .

[16]  Hiroshi Okamoto,et al.  A method for identification of effective locations of variable impedance apparatus on enhancement of steady-state stability in large scale power systems , 1995 .

[17]  J. K. Bladow,et al.  Experiences with parallel EHV phase shifting transformers , 1991 .

[18]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Power flow control by use of controllable series components , 1993 .

[19]  N. Martins,et al.  Determination of suitable locations for power system stabilizers and static VAr compensators for damping electromechanical oscillations in large scale power systems , 1989, Conference Papers Power Industry Computer Application Conference.

[20]  R. Baldick,et al.  Contract paths, phase-shifters, and efficient electricity trade , 1997 .