Systematic influence of different building spacing, height and layout on mean wind and turbulent characteristics within and over urban building arrays

Large eddy simulations have been performed within and over different types of urban building arrays. This paper adopted three dimensionless parameters, building frontal area density () the variation degree of building height (), and the staggered degree of building range (), to study the systematic influence of building spacing, height and layout on wind and turbulent characteristics. The following results have been achieved: (1) As decrease from 0.25 to 0.18, the mean flow patterns transfer from "skimming" flow to "wake interference" flow, and as decrease from 0.06 to 0.04, the mean flow patterns transfer from "wake interference" flow to "isolated roughness" flow. With increasing , wind velocity within arrays increases, and the vortexes in front of low buildings would break, even disappear, whereas the vortexes in front of tall buildings would strengthen and expand. Tall buildings have greater disturbance on wind than low buildings do. (2) All the wind velocity profiles and the upstream profile converge at the height of 2.5H approximately. The decay of wind velocity within the building canopy was in positive correlation with and . If the height of building arrays is variable, Macdonald`s wind velocity model should be modified through introducing , because wind velocity decreases at the upper layers of the canopy and increases at the lower layers of the canopy. (3) The maximum of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) always locates at 1.2 times as high as the buildings. TKE within the canopy decreases with increasing and but the maximum of TKE are very close though varies. (4) Wind velocity profile follows the logarithmic law approximately above the building canopy. The Zero-plane displacement heighten with increasing , whereas the maximum of and Roughness length occurs when is about 0.14. and heighten linearly with and , If is large enough, may become higher than the average height of buildings.

[1]  Ron Chi-Wai Kwok,et al.  Study of pollution dispersion in urban areas using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Geographic Information System (GIS) , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  T. G. Thomas,et al.  Mean Flow and Turbulence Statistics Over Groups of Urban-like Cubical Obstacles , 2006 .

[3]  Koichi Sada,et al.  Numerical calculation of flow and stack-gas concentration fluctuation around a cubical building , 2002 .

[4]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Numerical method study of how buildings affect the flow characteristics of an urban canopy , 2004 .

[5]  Stephen E. Belcher,et al.  A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas , 2004 .

[6]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  Numerical Modelling of the Turbulent Flow Developing Within and Over a 3-D Building Array, Part I: A High-Resolution Reynolds-Averaged Navier—Stokes Approach , 2004 .

[7]  T. Oke.  Street design and urban canopy layer climate , 1988 .

[8]  Ronald M. Cionco,et al.  A wind-profile index for canopy flow , 1972 .

[9]  Ian P. Castro,et al.  Near Wall Flow over Urban-like Roughness , 2002 .

[10]  G. T. Johnson,et al.  An investigation of three-dimensional characteristics of flow regimes within the urban canyon , 1992 .

[11]  R. Macdonald,et al.  Modelling The Mean Velocity Profile In The Urban Canopy Layer , 2000 .

[12]  R. Griffiths,et al.  An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays , 1998 .

[13]  Manabu Kanda,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Organized Structures within and above Explicitly Resolved Cube Arrays , 2004 .

[14]  M. Raupach,et al.  Experiments on scalar dispersion within a model plant canopy part I: The turbulence structure , 1986 .

[15]  C. Farell,et al.  Experimental issues in atmospheric boundary layer simulations: roughness length and integral length scale determination , 2001 .

[16]  J. Deardorff.  Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model , 1980 .

[17]  M. J. Davidson,et al.  Wind tunnel simulations of plume dispersion through groups of obstacles , 1996 .

[18]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays , 2002 .

[19]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Gust loading factor: past, present and future , 2003 .

[20]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Concentration Fluctuation Measurements in a Plume Dispersing Through a Regular Array of Obstacles , 2004 .

[21]  J. Golaz,et al.  Coamps®-Les: Model Evaluation and Analysis of Second-and Third-Moment Vertical Velocity Budgets , 2005 .

[22]  Stephen E. Belcher,et al.  Mean Winds Through an Inhomogeneous Urban Canopy , 2005 .

[23]  R. Ooka,et al.  Studies on critical Reynolds number indices for wind-tunnel experiments on flow within urban areas , 2003 .

[24]  D. J. Hall,et al.  A comparison of results from scaled field and wind tunnel modelling of dispersion in arrays of obstacles , 1998 .

[25]  William H. Snyder,et al.  The critical Reynolds number for rough-wall boundary layers , 2002 .

[26]  Nijs Jan Duijm.  Estimates of Roughness Parameters for Arrays of Obstacles , 1999 .

[27]  Ning Zhang,et al.  A large eddy simulation on the effect of buildings on urban flows , 2006 .

[28]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  Simulation of mean flow and turbulence over a 2D building array using high-resolution CFD and a distributed drag force approach , 2004 .

[29]  Timothy R. Oke,et al.  Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface Form , 1999 .

[30]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-d building array, part iii: a istributed drag force approach, its implementation and application , 2005 .

[31]  Richard Griffiths,et al.  Local characteristics of atmospheric dispersion within building arrays , 2001 .

[32]  J. Ehrhard,et al.  On a new nonlinear turbulence model for simulating flows around building-shaped structures , 2000 .

[33]  S. Belcher,et al.  Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.