Comparative assessment of MW-mile and MVA-mile methods of transmission tariff allocation and revenue reconciliation

This paper assesses the transmission tariff allocation and revenue reconciliation, using MW-mile and MVA-mile methods and compares them exhaustively. Since load consumers are major beneficiaries of the transmission network therefore, the transmission tariff allocations as well as the revenue reconciliation are being evaluated keeping them in consideration. The impact of power flow through a line due to MW or MVA withdrawal at a load bus has been derived using power flow analysis. The optimal parameters of power flow are determined for both actual and base loading of any circuit. The work presents methodical evaluation of transmission tariff allocation, has been performed with the three variants namely absolute, dominant and reverse. Multiple cases of the circuit utilization are simulated to the support findings more general. The tariff allocation to load buses reduces with increase in the line utilization for any variants used. Therefore, for economical tariff allocation and better revenue reconciliation, it has been recommended that, the average utilization of the network should maximum, for any variant used.

[1]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[2]  C. Rajagopalan,et al.  Cost of transmission transactions: an introduction , 1991 .

[3]  B. Gorenstin,et al.  Some fundamental, technical concepts about cost based transmission pricing , 1996 .

[4]  J. Lima Allocation of transmission fixed charges: an overview , 1996 .

[5]  Jong-Bae Park,et al.  An analytical approach for transaction costs allocation in transmission system , 1998 .

[6]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  An interval-based MADM approach to the identification of candidate alternatives in strategic resource planning , 2000 .

[7]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  Review of usage-based transmission cost allocation methods under open access , 2000 .

[8]  L. Lai Power system restructuring and deregulation : trading, perfomance and information technology , 2001 .

[9]  Loi Lei Lai,et al.  Power System Restructuring and Deregulation , 2001 .

[10]  T. Krause Evaluation of transmission pricing methods for liberalized markets , 2003 .

[11]  S. Serwan,et al.  Comparative analysis of using MW-Mile methods in transmission cost allocation for the Malaysia power system , 2003, Proceedings. National Power Engineering Conference, 2003. PECon 2003..

[12]  N. P. Padhy,et al.  A New Approach for Transmission Embedded Cost Allocation in Restructured Power Market , 2005 .

[13]  K.L. Lo,et al.  Certain Considerations In Pricing Unbundled Transmission Services , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Power and Energy Conference.

[14]  Mohammad Yusri Hassan,et al.  Assessment of MW-mile method for pricing transmission services: a negative flow-sharing approach , 2007 .

[15]  Manjaree Pandit,et al.  Incentive Charge Calculation for Open Access transmission system , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Power Systems.

[16]  N. P. Padhy,et al.  Allocation of transmission charge by using MVA-Mile approaches for restructured Indian power utility , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[17]  Manoj Fozdar,et al.  Transmission tariff allocation using combined MW-Mile & Postage stamp methods , 2011, ISGT2011-India.