Understanding opportunities and challenges for collaborative greenway planning in New England

Protection of natural, cultural, and recreational resources requires a regional approach to greenway planning that transcends political boundaries. Previous research on greenway planning has shown there are four main challenges in multi-jurisdictional greenway implementation: inter-governmental coordination, the lack of regional governance, funding, and public perceptions about greenways. The focus of this study was to understand successful strategies for collaborative greenway planning in the fragmented political landscape of New England (USA). To understand these issues, in-depth interviews were conducted with key greenway planners in New England from federal and state agencies and non-governmental organizations. The results of the study revealed four key strategies that are essential to multi-jurisdictional greenway planning in New England: partnerships, clearly defined goals, public involvement, and regional coordination. This study provides lessons for greenway planners who are implementing regional greenways across state, provincial, and international boundaries.

[1]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[2]  Robert L. Ryan,et al.  With people in mind : design and management of everyday nature , 1998 .

[3]  B. Gray.  Conditions Facilitating Interorganizational Collaboration , 1985 .

[4]  K. Stave.  Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions , 2002 .

[5]  W. Leach.  Surveying Diverse Stakeholder Groups , 2002 .

[6]  B. Checkoway.  Building Citizen Support for Planning at the Community Level , 1986, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[7]  B. Gray,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration , 1991 .

[8]  C. Huxham.  Creating Collaborative Advantage , 1997 .

[9]  Charles E. Little,et al.  Greenways for America , 1990 .

[10]  David W. Lounsbury,et al.  Building Collaborative Capacity in Community Coalitions: A Review and Integrative Framework , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[11]  J. G. Fábos.  Greenway planning in the United States: its origins and recent case studies , 2004 .

[12]  M. Shannon,et al.  Building greenway policies within a participatory democracy framework , 1995 .

[13]  Craig W. Thomas.  Bureaucratic Landscapes: Interagency Cooperation and the Preservation of Biodiversity , 2003 .

[14]  N. Roberts,et al.  Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation: A Study of Public Policy Initiation at the State Level , 1991 .

[15]  Robert L. Ryan,et al.  Continuing a Planning Tradition: The New England Greenway Vision Plan , 2002, Landscape Journal.

[16]  Kenneth Tamminga,et al.  Integrating public safety and use into planning urban greenways , 1995 .

[17]  Charles C. Schrader.  Rural greenway planning: the role of streamland perception in landowner acceptance of land management strategies , 1995 .

[18]  D. Sink.  Five Obstacles to Community-Based Collaboration and Some Thoughts on Overcoming Them , 1996 .

[19]  Julius Gy. Fabos,et al.  Introduction and overview: the greenway movement, uses and potentials of greenways , 1995 .

[20]  Barbara A. Ryder.  Greenway planning and growth management : partners in conservation ? , 1995 .

[21]  Robert L. Ryan,et al.  Protecting and managing private farmland and public greenways in the urban fringe , 2004 .