The Compatibility of Complex Systems and Reduction: A Case Analysis of Memory Research

Some theorists who emphasize the complexity of biological and cognitive systems and who advocate the employment of the tools of dynamical systems theory in explaining them construe complexity and reduction as exclusive alternatives. This paper argues that reduction, an approach to explanation that decomposes complex activities and localizes the components within the complex system, is not only compatible with an emphasis on complexity, but provides the foundation for dynamical analysis. Explanation via decomposition and localization is nonetheless extremely challenging, and an analysis of recent cognitive neuroscience research on memory is used to illustrate what is involved. Memory researchers split between advocating memory systems and advocating memory processes, and I argue that it is the latter approach that provides the critical sort of decomposition and localization for explaining memory. The challenges of linking distinguishable functions with brain processes is illustrated by two examples: competing hypotheses about the contribution of the hippocampus and competing attempts to link areas in frontal cortex with memory processing.

[1]  J. Elman.  Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, And Grammatical Structure , 1991 .

[2]  B T Hyman,et al.  H. M.’s Medial Temporal Lobe Lesion: Findings from Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  What do double dissociations prove? , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia , 1991 .

[5]  D. L. Hintzman.  Human learning and memory: connections and dissociations. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  S. Petersen,et al.  Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding , 1998, Neuron.

[7]  K. McDermott,et al.  Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: problems for transfer appropriate processing theory. , 1996, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[8]  W. Wimsatt.  Forms of Aggregativity , 1986 .

[9]  D. V. Essen,et al.  Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system , 1994, Neuron.

[10]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system , 1993 .

[11]  Helen E. Longino,et al.  Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research , 1995 .

[12]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  Functional Neuroimages Fail to Discover Pieces of Mind in the Parts of the Brain , 1997, Philosophy of Science.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[14]  Peter A. Tucker,et al.  Primary Memory , 1965, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[15]  K. S. Lashley.  In search of engram , 1988 .

[16]  Jonathan K. Foster,et al.  Memory : systems, process, or function? , 1999 .

[17]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[18]  R. Beer.  Dynamical approaches to cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  G. Ermentrout.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997 .

[20]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  What are the memory systems of 1994 , 1994 .

[21]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[22]  D S Touretzky,et al.  Theory of rodent navigation based on interacting representations of space , 1996, Hippocampus.

[23]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and relations , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  C. Campbell,et al.  On Being There , 1965 .

[25]  E. Tulving.  Memory: Performance, knowledge, and experience , 1989 .

[26]  Michael Wheeler,et al.  Explaining the Evolved: Homunculi, Modules, and Internal Representation , 1998, EvoRobot.

[27]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  T. Gelder,et al.  The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  R. Passingham.  The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[30]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[31]  L. Squire,et al.  Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. , 1980, Science.

[32]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[34]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[35]  William Bechtel,et al.  Connectionism and the Mind: Parallel Processing, Dynamics, and Evolution in Networks , 2002 .

[36]  Suzanne Corkin,et al.  ACQUISITION OF MOTOR SKILL AFTER BILATERAL MEDIAL TEMPORAL-LOBE EXCISION , 1968 .

[37]  D. Norman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW PRIMARY MEMORY1 , 1965 .

[38]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[39]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[40]  M. Shapiro,et al.  A simple network model simulates hippocampal place fields: II. Computing goal-directed trajectories and memory fields. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[41]  E. Tulving.  How many memory systems are there , 1985 .

[42]  T. Blaxton.  Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. , 1989 .

[43]  E. Tulving,et al.  Episodic and semantic memory , 1972 .

[44]  R. Buckner.  Beyond HERA: Contributions of specific prefrontal brain areas to long-term memory retrieval , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  J. Desmond,et al.  Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. , 1998, Science.

[46]  F. Craik,et al.  Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J. G. Taylor,et al.  Neural Networks and the Brain , 1974 .

[48]  D. Zipser.  A computational model of hippocampal place fields. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[49]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Study of memory: Processes and systems. , 1999 .

[50]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Asymmetric frontal activation during episodic memory: what kind of specificity? , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Multiple Learning and Memory Systems , 1984 .

[52]  M. Posner,et al.  Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of the Processing of Singe Words , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Desmond,et al.  The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  V. Hachinski.  Brain mapping. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[55]  T. Gelder,et al.  What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation? , 1995 .

[56]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[57]  A. Redish.  Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic Memory , 1999 .

[58]  E. Rolls,et al.  Neural networks and brain function , 1998 .

[59]  E. Tulving,et al.  Long-lasting perceptual priming and semantic learning in amnesia: a case experiment. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  W. Freeman,et al.  How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[61]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Components of Processing , 1999 .

[62]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[63]  E. Tulving,et al.  Richard Semon's Theory of Memory , 1978 .

[64]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[65]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Procedures of mind. , 1984 .