Crossmodal Integration Improves Sensory Detection Thresholds in the Ferret

During the last two decades ferrets (Mustela putorius) have been established as a highly efficient animal model in different fields in neuroscience. Here we asked whether ferrets integrate sensory information according to the same principles established for other species. Since only few methods and protocols are available for behaving ferrets we developed a head-free, body-restrained approach allowing a standardized stimulation position and the utilization of the ferret’s natural response behavior. We established a behavioral paradigm to test audiovisual integration in the ferret. Animals had to detect a brief auditory and/or visual stimulus presented either left or right from their midline. We first determined detection thresholds for auditory amplitude and visual contrast. In a second step, we combined both modalities and compared psychometric fits and the reaction times between all conditions. We employed Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) to model bimodal psychometric curves and to investigate whether ferrets integrate modalities in an optimal manner. Furthermore, to test for a redundant signal effect we pooled the reaction times of all animals to calculate a race model. We observed that bimodal detection thresholds were reduced and reaction times were faster in the bimodal compared to unimodal conditions. The race model and MLE modeling showed that ferrets integrate modalities in a statistically optimal fashion. Taken together, the data indicate that principles of multisensory integration previously demonstrated in other species also apply to crossmodal processing in the ferret.

[1]  Fernando R Nodal,et al.  Behavioural sensitivity to binaural spatial cues in ferrets: evidence for plasticity in the duplex theory of sound localization , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Multisensory processing in review: from physiology to behaviour. , 2010, Seeing and perceiving.

[3]  M. Keeling,et al.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception , 2022 .

[4]  M. Sur,et al.  Alteration of Visual Input Results in a Coordinated Reorganization of Multiple Visual Cortex Maps , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  I. Nelken,et al.  Functional organization of ferret auditory cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  M HERSHENSON,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Lawrence G. McDade,et al.  Behavioral Indices of Multisensory Integration: Orientation to Visual Cues is Affected by Auditory Stimuli , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  S. David,et al.  Adaptive, behaviorally-gated, persistent encoding of task-relevant auditory information in ferret frontal cortex , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Spence Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Schnupp,et al.  Sound localization behavior in ferrets: Comparison of acoustic orientation and approach-to-target responses , 2008, Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Chiu,et al.  Spontaneous Activity in Developing Ferret Visual Cortex In Vivo , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  The development of direction selectivity in ferret visual cortex requires early visual experience , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Building the Ferretome , 2015, bioRxiv.

[15]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Brenda Rapp,et al.  Principles of cross-modal competition: Evidence from deficits of attention , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  J. Saunders,et al.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? , 2003, Vision Research.

[18]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Christoph Kayser,et al.  Audio-Visual Detection Benefits in the Rat , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Functional Biases in Visual Cortex Neurons with Identified Projections to Higher Cortical Targets , 2012, Current Biology.

[21]  Christoph Kayser,et al.  Acoustic Noise Improves Visual Perception and Modulates Occipital Oscillatory States , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Winfried Denk,et al.  Miniaturization of two-photon microscopy for imaging in freely moving animals. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[23]  D. Wolpert,et al.  When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, Current Biology.

[24]  M. Landy,et al.  Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error , 2003, Vision Research.

[25]  James G. Fox,et al.  Biology and diseases of the ferret. , 2014 .

[26]  Jennifer K. Bizley,et al.  Visual influences on ferret auditory cortex , 2009, Hearing Research.

[27]  Barry Stein,et al.  A Bayesian model unifies multisensory spatial localization with the physiological properties of the superior colliculus , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Italo Masiello,et al.  Architecture and callosal connections of visual areas 17, 18, 19 and 21 in the ferret (Mustela putorius). , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Cortical Cholinergic Input Is Required for Normal Auditory Perception and Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Adult Ferrets , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  I. Nelken,et al.  Responses to linear and logarithmic frequency‐modulated sweeps in ferret primary auditory cortex , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  I. Nelken,et al.  Physiological and Anatomical Evidence for Multisensory Interactions in Auditory Cortex , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Testing the race model inequality: An algorithm and computer programs , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[35]  Andreas K Engel,et al.  Location, architecture, and retinotopy of the anteromedial lateral suprasylvian visual area (AMLS) of the ferret (Mustela putorius) , 2008, Visual Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Raab DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[37]  J. B. Kelly,et al.  Primary auditory cortex in the ferret (Mustela putorius): neural response properties and topographic organization , 1988, Brain Research.

[38]  Andreas K Engel,et al.  The anterior ectosylvian visual area of the ferret: a homologue for an enigmatic visual cortical area of the cat? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: A novel animal model for behavioral studies , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[40]  Andreas K Engel,et al.  Laminar profile of visual response properties in ferret superior colliculus. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research † , 2012, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[43]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[44]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  B. Stein,et al.  Enhancement of Perceived Visual Intensity by Auditory Stimuli: A Psychophysical Analysis , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  B. Stein,et al.  The Merging of the Senses , 1993 .

[47]  P. Manger,et al.  Immunohistochemical parcellation of the ferret (Mustela putorius) visual cortex reveals substantial homology with the cat (Felis catus) , 2010, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  Christopher R Fetsch,et al.  Visual–vestibular cue integration for heading perception: applications of optimal cue integration theory , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  S. Gepshtein,et al.  Viewing Geometry Determines How Vision and Haptics Combine in Size Perception , 2003, Current Biology.

[50]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Hongbo Yu,et al.  Rapid experience-dependent plasticity of synapse function and structure in ferret visual cortex in vivo , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Brian L Allman,et al.  Multisensory and unisensory neurons in ferret parietal cortex exhibit distinct functional properties , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[54]  Kerry M. M. Walker,et al.  Pitch discrimination by ferrets for simple and complex sounds. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[56]  Giorgio M Innocenti,et al.  The representation of the visual field in three extrastriate areas of the ferret (Mustela putorius) and the relationship of retinotopy and field boundaries to callosal connectivity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[58]  H. R. Clemo,et al.  Somatosensory and multisensory properties of the medial bank of the ferret rostral suprasylvian sulcus , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[59]  D. Raab Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. , 1962, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[60]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[61]  A. Diederich,et al.  Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: Effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  Robert A. A. Campbell,et al.  Physiological and behavioral studies of spatial coding in the auditory cortex , 2007, Hearing Research.

[63]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[64]  Giorgio M Innocenti,et al.  Areal organization of the posterior parietal cortex of the ferret (Mustela putorius). , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[65]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  Michael T. Lippert,et al.  Improvement of visual contrast detection by a simultaneous sound , 2007, Brain Research.

[67]  A. Alves-Pinto,et al.  Signal detection in animal psychoacoustics: Analysis and simulation of sensory and decision-related influences , 2012, Neuroscience.

[68]  Pietro G. Morasso,et al.  Self-Organization, Computational Maps, and Motor Control , 1997 .

[69]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[70]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Effects of Spatial Congruity on Audio-Visual Multimodal Integration , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.