A phantom design for assessment of detectability in PET imaging.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H C Gifford. Efficient visual-search model observers for PET. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.
[2] Jing Tang,et al. Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[3] P. Christian,et al. Quantitative PET/CT Scanner Performance Characterization Based Upon the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Clinical Trials Network Oncology Clinical Simulator Phantom , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[4] H. Makse,et al. A phase diagram for jammed matter , 2008, Nature.
[5] D. Townsend,et al. Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[6] Li Yang,et al. Regularization design in penalized maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for lesion detection in 3D PET. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[7] Suleman Surti,et al. Experimental evaluation of a simple lesion detection task with time-of-flight PET , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.
[8] Michael A. King,et al. Single-slice versus multi-slice display for human-observer lesion-detection studies , 1999 .
[9] B.M.W. Tsui,et al. Comparison of channelized hotelling and human observers in determining optimum OS-EM reconstruction parameters for myocardial SPECT , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[10] F. Vallentin,et al. Upper bounds for packings of spheres of several radii , 2012, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma.
[11] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers , 1997, Medical Imaging.
[12] Eric C. Frey,et al. Evaluation of myocardial defect detection between parallel-hole and fan-beam SPECT using the Hotelling trace , 1997 .
[13] Paul E Kinahan,et al. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[14] Harrison H Barrett,et al. Performance evaluation of a modular gamma camera using a detectability index. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[15] Michael Casey,et al. Clinical impact of time-of-flight and point response modeling in PET reconstructions: a lesion detection study , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[16] H Bal,et al. Improving PET spatial resolution and detectability for prostate cancer imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[17] Dan J Kadrmas,et al. Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[18] D. Lalush,et al. Comparison of Hotelling observer models and human observers in defect detection from myocardial SPECT imaging , 1999 .
[19] Maurizio Conti,et al. Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[20] Eric Clarkson,et al. Hardware assessment using the multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R): a signal-detection study. , 2007, Medical physics.
[21] C. Comtat,et al. A comparison of planar versus volumetric numerical observers for detection task performance in whole-body PET imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[22] Christophe Deroose,et al. Performance of MAP Reconstruction for Hot Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET/CT: An Evaluation With Human and Numerical Observers , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[23] P. Christian,et al. Use of a precision fillable clinical simulator phantom for PET/CT scanner validation in multi-center clinical trials: The SNM Clinical Trials Network (CTN) Program , 2012 .
[24] Sangtae Ahn,et al. Improving lesion detectability in PET imaging with a penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm , 2015, Medical Imaging.
[25] S. Wollenweber. A Multi-Contrast, Multi-Resolution Phantom for Radionuclide Imaging Using a Single Activity Concentration Fill , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[26] Steven G. Ross,et al. Application and Evaluation of a Measured Spatially Variant System Model for PET Image Reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[27] Eric C. Frey,et al. Evaluation of myocardial defect detection between parallel-hole and fan-beam SPECT using the Hotelling trace , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[28] Dylan Christopher Hunt,et al. Design and construction of a quality control phantom for SPECT and PET imaging. , 2009, Medical physics.
[29] F. Difilippo,et al. A fillable micro-hollow sphere lesion detection phantom using superposition , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[30] Matt A. King,et al. Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[31] Carole Lartizien,et al. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[32] D. Mankoff,et al. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Whole-Body Oncologic Studies: A Human Observer Lesion Detection and Localization Study , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[33] B.M.W. Tsui,et al. Comparison of channelized hotelling and human observers in determining optimum OSEM reconstruction parameters for myocardial SPECT , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).
[34] H H Barrett,et al. Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[35] J. Karp,et al. Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[36] Adam Wunderlich,et al. Exact Confidence Intervals for Channelized Hotelling Observer Performance in Image Quality Studies , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[37] Georges El Fakhri,et al. Impact of Acquisition Geometry, Image Processing, and Patient Size on Lesion Detection in Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[38] Matthew F Bieniosek,et al. Technical Note: Characterization of custom 3D printed multimodality imaging phantoms. , 2015, Medical physics.
[39] Frank P DiFilippo,et al. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance. , 2004, Medical physics.
[40] Feng Yan-lin. Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs(NEMA NU2-2001)(continuation) , 2003 .
[41] H.C. Gifford,et al. Evaluation of multiclass model observers in PET LROC studies , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..
[42] Jinyi Qi. Analysis of lesion detectability in Bayesian emission reconstruction with nonstationary object variability , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[43] Matthew A Kupinski,et al. Assessing image quality and dose reduction of a new x-ray computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm using model observers. , 2014, Medical physics.
[44] D. Townsend,et al. Initial assessment of image quality for low-dose PET: evaluation of lesion detectability , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.
[45] M D Blaufox,et al. PET imaging in oncology. , 2000, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[46] M. Casey,et al. Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[47] Paul E. Kinahan,et al. Effect of 18F-FDG Uptake Time on Lesion Detectability in PET Imaging of Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2015, Tomography.
[48] Richard L. Wahl,et al. Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.