PuLSE: Quality control and quantification of peptide sequences explored by phage display libraries

The design of highly diverse phage display libraries is based on assumption that DNA bases are incorporated at similar rates within the randomized sequence. As library complexity increases and expected copy numbers of unique sequences decrease, the exploration of library space becomes sparser and the presence of truly random sequences becomes critical. We present the program PuLSE (Phage Library Sequence Evaluation) as a tool for assessing randomness and therefore diversity of phage display libraries. PuLSE runs on a collection of sequence reads in the fastq file format and generates tables profiling the library in terms of unique DNA sequence counts and positions, translated peptide sequences, and normalized ‘expected’ occurrences from base to residue codon frequencies. The output allows at-a-glance quantitative quality control of a phage library in terms of sequence coverage both at the DNA base and translated protein residue level, which has been missing from toolsets and literature. The open source program PuLSE is available in two formats, a C++ source code package for compilation and integration into existing bioinformatics pipelines and precompiled binaries for ease of use.

[1]  D. Lane,et al.  Identification of novel mdm2 binding peptides by phage display. , 1996, Oncogene.

[2]  Dario Neri,et al.  Engineering recombinant antibodies for immunotherapy , 1995, Cell Biophysics.

[3]  Shohei Koide,et al.  Teaching an old scaffold new tricks: monobodies constructed using alternative surfaces of the FN3 scaffold. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Lee Makowski,et al.  Estimating the diversity of peptide populations from limited sequence data , 2003, Bioinform..

[5]  A simple and rapid method to isolate purer M13 phage by isoelectric precipitation , 2013, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[6]  G. P. Smith,et al.  Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. , 1985, Science.

[7]  B. Power,et al.  A new generation of protein display scaffolds for molecular recognition , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  H R Hoogenboom,et al.  Multi-subunit proteins on the surface of filamentous phage: methodologies for displaying antibody (Fab) heavy and light chains. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  A. Skerra Engineered protein scaffolds for molecular recognition , 2000, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[10]  Hassan M E Azzazy,et al.  Phage display technology: clinical applications and recent innovations. , 2002, Clinical biochemistry.

[11]  Thomas Lindner,et al.  DNA Libraries for the Construction of Phage Libraries: Statistical and Structural Requirements and Synthetic Methods , 2011, Molecules.

[12]  H R Hoogenboom,et al.  Natural and designer binding sites made by phage display technology. , 2000, Immunology today.

[13]  R. Ladner,et al.  Constrained peptides as binding entities. , 1995, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  B. Hammock,et al.  High-throughput method for ranking the affinity of peptide ligands selected from phage display libraries. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[15]  G. Winter,et al.  Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains , 1990, Nature.

[16]  B. Kay,et al.  Filamentous phage display in the new millennium. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[17]  Lee Makowski,et al.  Quantitative assessment of peptide sequence diversity in M13 combinatorial peptide phage display libraries. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  K. A. Noren,et al.  Construction of high-complexity combinatorial phage display peptide libraries. , 2001, Methods.

[19]  S. Schuster Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology , 2008, Nature Methods.

[20]  Shohei Koide,et al.  A potent and highly specific FN3 monobody inhibitor of the Abl SH2 domain , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[21]  M. Belfort,et al.  The requirement of nonsense suppression for the development of several phages , 1979, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[22]  G. Kuzmicheva,et al.  [Peptide phage display in biotechnology and biomedicine]. , 2017, Biomeditsinskaia khimiia.

[23]  Måns Magnusson,et al.  MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report , 2016, Bioinform..

[24]  G. Winter,et al.  Making antibodies by phage display technology. , 1994, Annual review of immunology.

[25]  M. Little,et al.  A surface expression vector for antibody screening. , 1991, Gene.

[26]  Michael W Deem,et al.  Amino acid alphabet size in protein evolution experiments: better to search a small library thoroughly or a large library sparsely? , 2008, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[27]  Lindsey T. Brinton,et al.  PHASTpep: Analysis Software for Discovery of Cell-Selective Peptides via Phage Display and Next-Generation Sequencing , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  N. Tonks,et al.  The use of phage display to generate conformation-sensor recombinant antibodies , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[29]  T. Clackson,et al.  Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries , 1991, Nature.

[30]  T. S. Lim,et al.  Phage Display , 2018, Methods in Molecular Biology.