Use of tensiometer response time to determine the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soil

The response time of tensiometers is controlled by the soil hydraulic conductivity when the flow resistance of the porous cup is sufficiently small. Therefore, we can determine the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils from the response of a tensiometer to an artificially-induced perturbation ofpressure. We evaluated a practical procedure to determine the conductivity by numerical simulations and by laboratory and field tests. The data can be analyzed by a simple graphical technique based on the linear slug test equation because nonlinear dependence ofhydraulic conductivity on matric potential head is not significant when the head perturbation is small (<0.5 m). Using readily available equipment, a field tensiometer response test generally takes less than 1 h. Tests can be repeated over time to determine the in situ relationship between hydraulic conductivity and matric potential. The estimated conductivity is sensitive to the disturbance of the soil in close proximity to the porous cup. To improve the reliability of response tests, new methods need to be developed to install tensiometers with minimum soil disturbance. Despite the problem of soil disturbance, the tensiometer response test is an attractive method in clay-rich soils where other field methods are not easily applicable.

[1]  L. A. Richards,et al.  Further Developments on Apparatus for Field Moisture Studies , 1938 .

[2]  A. Klute,et al.  TENSIOMETER RESPONSE TIME , 1962 .

[3]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Paper No. H-21 , 1966 .

[4]  H. Bouwer,et al.  A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .

[5]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[6]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[7]  G. Towner THEORY OF TIME RESPONSE OF TENSIOMETERS , 1980 .

[8]  P. Wierenga,et al.  A Pressure Transducer for Field Tensiometers1 , 1983 .

[9]  S. Dreiss A NUMERICAL TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING TRANSIENT FLOW OF WATER TO A SOIL WATER SAMPLER , 1986 .

[10]  R. Gillham,et al.  FRACTURE EFFECTS IN THE SHALLOW GROUNDWATER ZONE IN WEATHERED SARNIA-AREA CLAY , 1989 .

[11]  M. Celia,et al.  A General Mass-Conservative Numerical Solution for the Unsaturated Flow Equation , 1990 .

[12]  Serge Leroueil,et al.  Analysis of the in situ constant-head permeability test in clays , 1990 .

[13]  T. Tokunaga THE PRESSURE RESPONSE OF THE SOIL WATER SAMPLER AND POSSIBILITIES FOR SIMULTANEOUS SOIL SOLUTION SAMPLING AND TENSIOMETRY , 1992 .

[14]  E. Sudicky,et al.  A Noniterative Technique for the Direct Implementation of Well Bore Boundary Conditions in Three‐Dimensional Heterogeneous Formations , 1995 .

[15]  Molly M. Gribb,et al.  PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR DETERMINING HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF A FINE SAND FROM TRANSIENT FLOW MEASUREMENTS , 1996 .