Autonomous Distributed Energy Systems: Problematising the Invisible through Design, Drama and Deliberation

Technologies such as blockchains, smart contracts and programmable batteries facilitate emerging models of energy distribution, trade and consumption, and generate a considerable number of opportunities for energy markets. However, these developments complicate relationships between stakeholders, disrupting traditional notions of value, control and ownership. Discussing these issues with the public is particularly challenging as energy consumption habits often obscure the competing values and interests that shape stakeholders' relationships. To make such difficult discussions more approachable and examine the missing relational aspect of autonomous energy systems, we combined the design of speculative hairdryers with performance and deliberation. This integrated method of inquiry makes visible the competing values and interests, eliciting people's wishes to negotiate these terms. We argue that the complexity of mediated energy distribution and its convoluted stakeholder relationships requires more sophisticated methods of inquiry to engage people in debates concerning distributed energy systems.

[1]  Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas,et al.  A socially inspired energy feedback technology: challenges in a developing scenario , 2016, AI & SOCIETY.

[2]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Invisible design: exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios , 2012, DIS '12.

[3]  Bettina Nissen,et al.  On Speculative Enactments , 2017, CHI.

[4]  J. Steiner,et al.  The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications , 2012, International Dialogue.

[5]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2013 .

[6]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI , 2015, CHI.

[7]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  What is "critical" about critical design? , 2013, CHI.

[8]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Tariff Agent , 2016, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[9]  Stephen Coleman,et al.  Deliberation and Democracy: Innovative Processes and Institutions , 2016 .

[10]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .

[11]  Stuart Andrews,et al.  Performative experience design , 2013, Springer Series on Cultural Computing.

[12]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities , 2009, UbiComp.

[13]  J. Dryzek Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building , 2009 .

[14]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Tiree Energy Pulse: Exploring Renewable Energy Forecasts on the Edge of the Grid , 2015, CHI.

[15]  Sarah Manski,et al.  Building the blockchain world: Technological commonwealth or just more of the same?† , 2017 .

[16]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The argumentative turn in public policy revisited: twenty years later , 2013 .

[17]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue , 2005 .

[18]  David Thacher Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , 2005 .

[19]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Anti-Solutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction , 2016, CHI.

[20]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Real-Time Power Balancing Via Decentralized Coordinated Home Energy Scheduling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[21]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[22]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Does speculative design contribute to public engagement of science and technology , 2009 .

[23]  James Auger,et al.  Speculative design: crafting the speculation , 2013, Digit. Creativity.

[24]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  Operationalizing design fiction with anticipatory ethnography , 2015 .

[25]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  LokalPower: Enabling Local Energy Markets with User-Driven Engagement , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Stephen Coleman,et al.  Dramatizing Deliberation: A Method for Encouraging Young People to Think About Their Rights , 2018, Regular Issue.

[27]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems , 2012, CHI.

[28]  Gerard J. M. Smit,et al.  Management and Control of Domestic Smart Grid Technology , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[29]  Davor Svetinovic,et al.  Security and Privacy in Decentralized Energy Trading Through Multi-Signatures, Blockchain and Anonymous Messaging Streams , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[30]  M. Michael “What Are We Busy Doing?” , 2012 .

[31]  Jane Mansbridge,et al.  Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy At The Large Scale , 2013 .

[32]  Enrique Encinas,et al.  Reconstrained Design: Confronting Oblique Design Constraints , 2017, Nordes 2017: Design and Power.

[33]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Solutionism, the Game: Design Fictions for Positive Aging , 2015, CHI.

[34]  A. Follesdal The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in the Deliberative Democracy , 2010 .

[35]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts , 2014, CHI.

[36]  Andy Boucher,et al.  Power to the people: dynamic energy management through communal cooperation , 2012, DIS '12.

[37]  G. Fulli,et al.  A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective , 2011 .

[38]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Performing Research: Four Contributions to HCI , 2017, CHI.

[39]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Doing the laundry with agents: a field trial of a future smart energy system in the home , 2014, CHI.

[40]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design for Debate , 2008 .