Uplink performance analysis in multi-tier heterogeneous celluar networks with power control and biased user association

A Κ-tier uplink heterogeneous cellular network is modelled and analysed by accounting for both truncated channel inversion power control and biased user association. Each user has a maximum transmit power constraint and transmits data when it has sufficient transmit power to perform channel inversion. With biased user association, each user is associated with a base station (BS) that provides the maximum received power weighted by a bias factor, but not their nearest BS. Stochastic geometry is used to evaluate the performances of the proposed system model in terms of the outage probability and ergodic rate for each tier as functions of the biased and power control parameters. Simulation validate our analytical derivations. Numerical results show that there exists a trade-off introduced by the power cut-off threshold and the maximum user transmit power constraint. When the maximum user transmit power becomes a binding constraint, the overall performance is independent of BS densities. In addition, we have shown that it is beneficial for the outage and rate performances by optimizing different network parameters such as the power cut-off threshold as well as the biased factors.

[1]  Stefan Parkvall,et al.  Evolution of LTE toward IMT-advanced , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  On Stochastic Geometry Modeling of Cellular Uplink Transmission With Truncated Channel Inversion Power Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Uplink rate distribution in heterogeneous cellular networks with power control and load balancing , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[4]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Joint Rate and SINR Coverage Analysis for Decoupled Uplink-Downlink Biased Cell Associations in HetNets , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[6]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  Timothy X. Brown,et al.  Cellular performance bounds via shotgun cellular systems , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[9]  Carsten F. Ball,et al.  Contrasting Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Power Control Performance in UTRAN LTE Uplink by UE Trace Analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[10]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Uplink Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Mean Interference in Hard-Core Wireless Networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[12]  Tony Q. S. Quek,et al.  Throughput Optimization, Spectrum Allocation, and Access Control in Two-Tier Femtocell Networks , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Heterogeneous Cellular Networks with Flexible Cell Association: A Comprehensive Downlink SINR Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Evolution toward 5G multi-tier cellular wireless networks: An interference management perspective , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[15]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Performance of Uplink Fractional Power Control in UTRAN LTE , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.