Does Facial Resemblance Enhance Cooperation?

Facial self-resemblance has been proposed to serve as a kinship cue that facilitates cooperation between kin. In the present study, facial resemblance was manipulated by morphing stimulus faces with the participants' own faces or control faces (resulting in self-resemblant or other-resemblant composite faces). A norming study showed that the perceived degree of kinship was higher for the participants and the self-resemblant composite faces than for actual first-degree relatives. Effects of facial self-resemblance on trust and cooperation were tested in a paradigm that has proven to be sensitive to facial trustworthiness, facial likability, and facial expression. First, participants played a cooperation game in which the composite faces were shown. Then, likability ratings were assessed. In a source memory test, participants were required to identify old and new faces, and were asked to remember whether the faces belonged to cooperators or cheaters in the cooperation game. Old-new recognition was enhanced for self-resemblant faces in comparison to other-resemblant faces. However, facial self-resemblance had no effects on the degree of cooperation in the cooperation game, on the emotional evaluation of the faces as reflected in the likability judgments, and on the expectation that a face belonged to a cooperator rather than to a cheater. Therefore, the present results are clearly inconsistent with the assumption of an evolved kin recognition module built into the human face recognition system.

[1]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. , 2009 .

[3]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  Facial-Feature Resemblance Elicits the Transference Effect , 2010, Psychological science.

[4]  G. Gallup,et al.  Reactions to children's faces: Resemblance affects males more than females , 2002 .

[5]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[6]  Robert A. Nash,et al.  Look who's talking! Facial appearance can bias source monitoring , 2010, Memory.

[7]  Michael J. Marks,et al.  Westermarck, Freud, and the Incest Taboo: Does Familial Resemblance Activate Sexual Attraction? , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  Beatrice G. Kuhlmann,et al.  Influences of Source - Item Contingency and Schematic Knowledge on Source Monitoring: Tests of the Probability-Matching Account. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[9]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  Understanding Kin Relationships in a Photo , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[10]  Pat Barclay,et al.  A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good , 2008 .

[11]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  K. Krauel,et al.  The human brain is a detector of chemosensorily transmitted HLA-class I-similarity in same- and opposite-sex relations , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  T. Blumenthal,et al.  Effect of Facial Self-Resemblance on the Startle Response and Subjective Ratings of Erotic Stimuli in Heterosexual Men , 2011, Archives of sexual behavior.

[14]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed Facial Similarity as a Political Cue: A Preliminary Investigation , 2006 .

[15]  K. Berenson,et al.  Childhood Physical and Emotional Abuse by a Parent: Transference Effects in Adult Interpersonal Relations , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[16]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Kinship on the Kibbutz: coresidence duration predicts altruism, personal sexual aversions and moral attitudes among communally reared peers , 2012 .

[18]  W. Hamilton The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[19]  P. Benson,et al.  Recognizing one's own face , 2001, Cognition.

[20]  A. Buchner,et al.  No enhanced memory for faces of cheaters , 2008 .

[21]  Jochen Musch,et al.  Estimating the Prevalence of Nonpaternity in Germany , 2012, Human nature.

[22]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[23]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The architecture of human kin detection , 2007, Nature.

[25]  L. DeBruine,et al.  Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision , 1994 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Do people differentially remember cheaters? , 2006, Human nature.

[29]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. , 1996 .

[30]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Facial Similarity Between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence , 2008 .

[31]  A. Alvergne,et al.  Cross-cultural perceptions of facial resemblance between kin. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[32]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  A. Todorov Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  Perceptual Factors Affecting the Ability to Assess Facial Resemblance between Parents and Newborns in Humans , 2010, Perception.

[35]  Thomas E. Myers,et al.  How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance , 2003 .

[36]  R. Porter,et al.  Human kin recognition by olfactory cues , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[37]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Mark Van Vugt,et al.  Psychology of Human Kin Recognition: Heuristic Cues, Erroneous Inferences, and Their Implications , 2008 .

[39]  L. DeBruine,et al.  Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same–sex faces more than other–sex faces , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Meike Kroneisen,et al.  Sex, cheating, and disgust: Enhanced source memory for trait information that violates gender stereotypes , 2013, Memory.

[41]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Familiarity enhances visual working memory for faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Ming Shao,et al.  Kinship Verification through Transfer Learning , 2011, IJCAI.

[43]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[44]  R. Bell,et al.  On the flexibility of social source memory: a test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  P. Bressan,et al.  Men Do not Have a Stronger Preference than Women for Self-resemblant Child Faces , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[46]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. , 2001 .

[47]  L. DeBruine,et al.  Kin recognition: evidence that humans can perceive both positive and negative relatedness , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[48]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[49]  Source memory for faces is determined by their emotional evaluation. , 2011, Emotion.

[50]  Laurence T Maloney,et al.  Kin recognition and the perceived facial similarity of children. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[51]  D. Wright,et al.  An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[52]  R. Bell,et al.  How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  R. Bell,et al.  Enhanced old–new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game , 2010, Cognition.

[54]  S. Craig Roberts,et al.  MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review , 2009, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[55]  R. Bell,et al.  No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters ! , 2009 .

[56]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Evidence for an Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition. , 2006 .

[57]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[58]  L. DeBruine Facial resemblance enhances trust , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  J. Greeff,et al.  Low nonpaternity rate in an old Afrikaner family , 2012 .