Prioritizing convention quality attributes from the perspective of three-factor theory: the case of academic association convention.

Abstract This study examines the asymmetric effects of convention attribute performance on attendee satisfaction (AS) from the perspective of three-factor theory through impact range-performance analysis and impact-asymmetry analysis. This approach enables classification and prioritization of convention attributes as frustrators, dissatisfiers, hybrids, satisfiers, and delighters for the effective management of AS. Moreover, this approach allows assessment of each attribute's range of impact on AS. Through these methods, researchers/practitioners are able to easily pinpoint areas of concern for performance improvement. Findings are to offer industry practitioners insights into prioritizing attributes and effectively addressing AS.

[1]  Gary W. Loveman,et al.  Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work , 1994 .

[2]  S. Hollenhorst,et al.  Use of importance-performance analysis to evaluate state park cabins: the case of the West Virginia state park system. , 1992 .

[3]  Josip Mikulić,et al.  A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model , 2011 .

[4]  Haemoon Oh,et al.  Revisiting importance–performance analysis , 2001 .

[5]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[6]  Josefa D. Martín,et al.  Factors influencing destination image , 2004 .

[7]  R. N. Maddox,et al.  Two-factor Theory and Consumer Satisfaction: Replication and Extension , 1981 .

[8]  E. Anderson,et al.  Strengthening the Satisfaction-Profit Chain , 2000 .

[9]  C. Fornell,et al.  Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden , 1994 .

[10]  Johann Füller,et al.  Customer delight and market segmentation: an application of the three-factor theory of customer satisfaction on life style groups. , 2008 .

[11]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[12]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Employee Satisfaction: Does Kano's Model Apply? , 2004 .

[13]  R. Oliver,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Consequences of Behavior-and Outcome-Based Sales Control Systems , 1994 .

[14]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[15]  F. Herzberg,et al.  The motivation to work , 1960 .

[16]  J. Beck,et al.  Understanding Motivations, Inhibitors, and Facilitators of Association Members in Attending International Conferences , 2001 .

[17]  R. Rust,et al.  Should we delight the customer? , 2000 .

[18]  R. Oliver Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. , 1981 .

[19]  R. Butler Information seeking and achievement motivation in middle childhood and adolescence: the role of conceptions of ability. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[20]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[21]  G. Crouch,et al.  Convention site selection research: a review, conceptual model, and propositional framework. , 1997 .

[22]  B. Schneider,et al.  Understanding Customer Delight and Outrage , 1999 .

[23]  Jin-Soo Lee,et al.  Attendee-based brand equity , 2008 .

[24]  Barry Berman,et al.  How to Delight Your Customers , 2005 .

[25]  Barbara L. Gross,et al.  Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values , 1991 .

[26]  J. Louviere,et al.  The Determinants of Convention Site Selection: A Logistic Choice Model from Experimental Data , 2004 .

[27]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[28]  G. Soutar,et al.  Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale , 2001 .

[29]  Cihan Cobanoglu,et al.  Service quality in Cretan accommodations: marketing strategies for the UK holiday market , 2003 .

[30]  J. Füller,et al.  Asymmetric effects in customer satisfaction , 2006 .

[31]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality , 1996 .

[32]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[33]  K. Matzler,et al.  Die Opponent-Prozess-Theorie als Erklärungsansatz einer Mehr-Faktor-Struktur der Kundenzufriedenheit , 2000 .

[34]  J. Healey Statistics: A Tool for Social Research , 1995 .

[35]  K. Back,et al.  Country Club Members’ Perceptions of Value, Image Congruence, and Switching Costs: an Exploratory Study of Country Club Members’ Loyalty , 2009 .

[36]  Birgit Renzl,et al.  Assessing asymmetric effects in the formation of employee satisfaction , 2007 .

[37]  Jin-Soo Lee,et al.  Reexamination of attendee-based brand equity. , 2010 .

[38]  Joanne Yoo,et al.  Factors Affecting Convention Participation Decision-Making: Developing a Measurement Scale , 2008 .

[39]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  How to delight your customers , 1996 .

[40]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  Examining the Role of Multidimensional Value in Convention Attendee Behavior , 2013 .

[41]  K. Chon,et al.  Convention participation decision-making process. , 1997 .

[42]  Youcheng Wang,et al.  Examining the motivation, perceived performance, and behavioral intentions of convention attendees: evidence from a regional conference. , 2007 .

[43]  M. Oppermann,et al.  Association Involvement and Convention Participation , 1998 .

[44]  David M. Levine,et al.  Statistics for Managers , 2008 .

[45]  William T. Ross,et al.  The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-Level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions , 1998 .

[46]  Ki-Joon Back,et al.  Impact-range performance analysis and asymmetry analysis for improving quality of Korean food attributes. , 2012 .

[47]  Josip Mikulić,et al.  Prioritizing improvement of service attributes using impact range‐performance analysis and impact‐asymmetry analysis , 2008 .

[48]  Michael J. Showalter,et al.  The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and Implications , 1999 .