The Relationship between Reaction Time and Intensity in Discrete Auditory Tasks

The effect of signal intensity upon reaction time (RT) was studied in three auditory RT tasks in which the signal was a tone of high or low frequency. Experiment I showed the well-known negative gradient with intensity of simple RT when the subject was instructed to ignore the frequency and give the same response to both tones. But when the subject had to discriminate the frequency in a choice RT task, the RT/intensity relationship appeared to be U-shaped. Experiment II showed that when the subject was required to make a response to one signal but withhold it for the other, a task which requires discrimination of the frequency of the tone but removes the necessity to choose between overt responses, no increase in RT at high intensities was obtained. The results indicate that it is the response choice stage rather than the stimulus encoding stage which is retarded at higher energy levels. Experiment I also demonstrated that visual and auditory leading signals have similar facilitating effects without affecting the RT/intensity relationships.

[1]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[2]  M. Nissen,et al.  Stimulus intensity and information processing , 1977 .

[3]  P. Keuss,et al.  Transmarginal inhibition in a reaction time task as a function of extraversion and neuroticism. , 1977, Acta psychologica.

[4]  D A Taylor,et al.  Stage analysis of reaction time. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  The Foreperiod Effect Revisited , 1975 .

[6]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement? , 1973, Psychological review.

[7]  Donald L. Schurman,et al.  Stimulus Intensity and Foreperiod Effects in Intersensory Facilitation , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  A. Sanders,et al.  The Relation between Physical Stimulus Properties and the Effect of Foreperiod Duration on Reaction Time , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  P J Keuss,et al.  Reaction time to the second of two shortly spaced auditory signals both varying in intensity. , 1972, Acta psychologica.

[10]  D L Kohfeld,et al.  Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  D. L. Kohfeld Effects of Ready-Signal Intensity and Intensity of the Preceding Response Signal on Simple Reaction Time , 1969 .

[12]  Grice Gr,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968 .

[13]  Vidkunn Coucheron Thrane SENSORY AND PREPARATORY FACTORS IN RESPONSE LATENCY.: IV. General and differential warning of full-scale auditory intensities , 1961 .

[14]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The time-course of preparation: Confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals , 1969 .

[15]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[16]  G R Grice,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968, Psychological review.

[17]  R. Woodworth,et al.  Experimental psychology, Rev. ed. , 1954 .

[18]  R. Chocholle,et al.  Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences , 1940 .