Age-friendly cities, knowledge and urban restructuring

ABSTRACT Age-friendly cities and communities have emerged as a significant policy, participative and governance response to ageing and its spatial effects. This paper argues that it has important benefits in mobilizing older people, placing age on the urban agenda and building recognition across politicians, policy makers and programme managers. Based on the experience of Belfast (UK), the analysis suggests, however, that it needs to be understood within wider urban restructuring processes, the importance of the property economy and how planning practices favour particular groups and modes of development. Drawing on demographic data, policy documents and in-depth interviews, it evaluates the relationship between age and urban regeneration, research-based advocacy and central-local relations in health and place-based care. The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of knowledge in competitive policy arenas and the need to focus on the most excluded and isolated old and where and how they live.

[1]  Mariana T. Atkins.  Creating age-friendly cities: prioritizing interventions with Q-methodology , 2020, International Planning Studies.

[2]  Virginia Braun,et al.  One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? , 2020, Qualitative Research in Psychology.

[3]  Albert P. C. Chan,et al.  Age-friendly cities and communities: a review and future directions , 2020, Ageing and Society.

[4]  Elizabeth L. Tung,et al.  Social Isolation, Loneliness, And Violence Exposure In Urban Adults. , 2019, Health affairs.

[5]  B. Murtagh,et al.  Shared space in post-conflict Belfast , 2019, Space and Polity.

[6]  Katri Koistinen,et al.  The Attractiveness of a City-Centre Shopping Environment: Older Consumers’ Perspective , 2019, Urban Planning.

[7]  M. Warner,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Livability for All Ages: Inclusivity Is the Key , 2019, Urban Planning.

[8]  R. Reis,et al.  Built environment correlates of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults: A comparative review between high and low-middle income countries. , 2019, Health & place.

[9]  J. Andrey,et al.  The knowledge economy city: Gentrification, studentification and youthification, and their connections to universities , 2019 .

[10]  C. Phillipson,et al.  Ageing in a Gentrifying Neighbourhood: Experiences of Community Change in Later Life , 2019, Sociology.

[11]  R. Kane,et al.  Ageing in the margins: expectations of and struggles for ‘a good place to grow old’ among low-income older Minnesotans , 2018, Ageing and Society.

[12]  M. Laine,et al.  Researchers as knowledge brokers: translating knowledge or co-producing legitimacy? An urban infill case from Finland , 2018 .

[13]  T. Buffel.  Social research and co-production with older people: Developing age-friendly communities. , 2018, Journal of aging studies.

[14]  D. Dannefer,et al.  Addressing erasure, microfication and social change: age-friendly initiatives and environmental gerontology in the 21st century , 2018 .

[15]  B. Murtagh.  Ageing and the social economy , 2017 .

[16]  A. Walker.  Why the UK Needs a Social Policy on Ageing , 2017, Journal of Social Policy.

[17]  E. O’brien.  Planning for population ageing: the rhetoric of ‘active ageing’ – theoretical shortfalls, policy limits, practical constraints and the crucial requirement for societal interventions , 2017 .

[18]  G. Ellis,et al.  Mapping Isolation and Loneliness Amongst Older People in Belfast Report Commissioned by the Belfast Strategic Partnership , 2016 .

[19]  C. Phillipson,et al.  Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and ageing populations , 2016 .

[20]  Amanda J. Lehning,et al.  Creating Aging-Friendly Communities , 2015 .

[21]  S. Steels,et al.  Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review , 2015 .

[22]  M. Geddes.  Neoliberalism and local governance: Radical developments in Latin America , 2014 .

[23]  A. Madanipour.  Researching Space, Transgressing Epistemic Boundaries , 2013 .

[24]  Charlotte Scotchbrook,et al.  Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-First Century , 2012 .

[25]  Phil Allmendinger,et al.  Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries, and Metagovernance: The New Spatial Planning in the Thames Gateway , 2009 .

[26]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory , 2007 .

[27]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Consensus-building across Difficult Divisions: New approaches to collaborative strategy making , 1996 .

[28]  Belfast Healthy City,et al.  Walkability Assessment for Healthy Ageing , 2014 .

[29]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Making Better Places , 2010 .