A Multi-Methodological Approach to Study Systems Development in a Software Organization

Large-scale systems development is a complex activity involving number of dependencies that people working together face. Only a few studies concentrate on the coordination of development activities in their organizational context. This research study tries to fill at least part of this gap by studying how systems development process is coordinated in practice. The study uses a multimethodological approach to interpret coordination of systems development process in a contemporary software organization in Finland. The methodology is based on the empirical casestudy approach in which the actions, conceptions, and artefacts of practitioners are analyzed using within-case and cross-case principles. In all the three phases of the study, namely multi-\site coordination, requirement understanding, and working with systems development methods, both the qualitative and quantitative methods were used to an understanding of coordination in systems development. The main contribution of this study is to demonstrate that contemporary systems development is much more complex and more driven by opportunity than is currently acknowledged by researchers. The most challenging part of the research process was the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, because of the lack of multimethodological work done in IS discipline.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[2]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[3]  David E. Avison,et al.  The fiction of methodological development: a field study of information systems development , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Metaphors of virtuality: shaping an emergent reality , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[6]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[8]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  Kari Smolander,et al.  Filtering, Negotiating and Shifting in the Understanding of Information System Requirements , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[11]  Matti Rossi,et al.  Architecture as a coordination tool in multi-site software development , 2003, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[12]  Richard J. Ormerod Putting Soft OR Methods to Work: Information Systems Strategy Development at Sainsbury's , 1995 .

[13]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[14]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[15]  Allen S. Lee Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[16]  John Mingers,et al.  The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions , 1987, CSUR.

[19]  Michael Rosen COMING TO TERMS WITH THE FIELD: UNDERSTANDING AND DOING ORGANIZATIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY* , 1991 .

[20]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[22]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature , 2002, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[23]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[24]  John Mingers,et al.  The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practitioners , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.