Assessment of the extent of microcalcifications to predict the size of a ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison between tomosynthesis and conventional mammography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Thomas Frauenfelder | Andreas Boss | A. Boss | T. Frauenfelder | N. Berger | Z. Varga | C. Rageth | Nicole Berger | Sibylle Dubach Schwizer | Zsuzsanna Varga | Christoph Rageth
[1] George Hermann,et al. Mammographic Appearance of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Reflects Pathologic Characteristics , 2002, Annals of surgery.
[2] P. Hermanek,et al. The pathologist and the residual tumor (R) classification. , 1994, Pathology, research and practice.
[3] S. Astley,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis at screening assessment: are two views always necessary? , 2015, The British journal of radiology.
[4] A. Beckett,et al. AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.
[5] J M Bland,et al. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .
[6] David Gur,et al. Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. , 2010, Academic radiology.
[7] T. Yokoi,et al. Extensive intraductal component (EIC) and estrogen receptor (ER) status in breast cancer , 1998, Pathology international (Print).
[8] J. Peterse,et al. Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in-situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853--a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[9] Brittany Lapin,et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010. , 2014, JAMA surgery.
[10] Per Skaane,et al. Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. , 2013, Breast.
[11] D. Cicchetti. Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .
[12] S. Pinder,et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[13] M. Morrow,et al. Is There a Low-Grade Precursor Pathway in Breast Cancer? , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[14] Kornelia Polyak,et al. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast , 2004, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.
[15] Andriy I. Bandos,et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.
[16] S. Ciatto,et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.
[17] S. Meterissian,et al. Value of pre-operative breast MRI for the size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.
[18] H. Thornton,et al. Ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast , 1992, The Lancet.
[19] N Houssami,et al. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.
[20] L. Koppert,et al. Benefits of preoperative MRI in breast cancer surgery studied in a large population‐based cancer registry , 2015, The British journal of surgery.
[21] J. Peterse,et al. Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase III trial 10853 , 2006 .
[22] D. Cicchetti,et al. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.