DNA damage tolerance: when it's OK to make mistakes.

Mutations can be beneficial under conditions in which genetic diversity is advantageous, such as somatic hypermutation and antibody generation, but they can also be lethal when they disrupt basic cellular processes or cause uncontrolled proliferation and cancer. Mutations arise from inaccurate processing of lesions generated by endogenous and exogenous DNA damaging agents, and the genome is particularly vulnerable to such damage during S phase. In this phase of the cell cycle, many lesions in the DNA template block replication. Such lesions must be bypassed in order to preserve fork stability and to ensure completion of DNA replication. Lesion bypass is carried out by a set of error-prone and error-free processes collectively referred to as DNA damage tolerance mechanisms. Here, we discuss how two types of DNA damage tolerance, translesion synthesis and template switching, are regulated at stalled replication forks by ubiquitination of PCNA, and the conditions under which they occur.

[1]  P. Lambin,et al.  Lysine 63-Polyubiquitination Guards against Translesion Synthesis–Induced Mutations , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[2]  K. Sugimoto,et al.  ATR Homolog Mec1 Controls Association of DNA Polymerase ζ-Rev1 Complex with Regions near a Double-Strand Break , 2006, Current Biology.

[3]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  Effect of proliferating cell nuclear antigen ubiquitination and chromatin structure on the dynamic properties of the Y-family DNA polymerases. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[5]  L. Prakash,et al.  Ubiquitylation of yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen and its implications for translesion DNA synthesis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Y. Shinkai,et al.  Polκ protects mammalian cells against the lethal and mutagenic effects of benzo[a]pyrene , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. , 2005, Annual review of biochemistry.

[8]  M. Bienz.  The PHD finger, a nuclear protein-interaction domain. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[9]  S. Lauder,et al.  Yeast DNA Repair Proteins Rad6 and Rad18 Form a Heterodimer That Has Ubiquitin Conjugating, DNA Binding, and ATP Hydrolytic Activities* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Y. Yamagata,et al.  Recognition of forked and single‐stranded DNA structures by human RAD18 complexed with RAD6B protein triggers its recruitment to stalled replication forks , 2008, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[11]  A. Yasui,et al.  Regulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen ubiquitination in mammalian cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  A. Davies,et al.  The RING finger ATPase Rad5p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contributes to DNA double-strand break repair in a ubiquitin-independent manner , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  K. Cimprich,et al.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  S. Gygi,et al.  Regulation of monoubiquitinated PCNA by DUB autocleavage , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  J. Lemontt,et al.  Mutants of yeast defective in mutation induced by ultraviolet light. , 1971, Genetics.

[16]  Boris Pfander,et al.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.

[17]  B. A. Ballif,et al.  ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage , 2007, Science.

[18]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin‐conjugating enzymes in DNA repair , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[19]  Mihoko Kai,et al.  Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. , 2003, Genes & development.

[20]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Preferential cis–syn thymine dimer bypass by DNA polymerase η occurs with biased fidelity , 2004, Nature.

[21]  K. Cimprich,et al.  The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork. , 2007, DNA repair.

[22]  L. Zou,et al.  Chk1 and Claspin potentiate PCNA ubiquitination. , 2008, Genes & development.

[23]  I. Dikic,et al.  Requirements for the Interaction of Mouse Polκ with Ubiquitin and Its Biological Significance* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  L. Zou,et al.  Single- and double-stranded DNA: building a trigger of ATR-mediated DNA damage response. , 2007, Genes & development.

[25]  Michio Kawasuji,et al.  Rad18 guides polη to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[26]  C. Lawrence,et al.  UV mutagenesis in radiation-sensitive strains of yeast. , 1976, Genetics.

[27]  C. Lawrence,et al.  The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Controlling the subcellular localization of DNA polymerases ι and η via interactions with ubiquitin , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[29]  S. Jentsch,et al.  PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork , 2007, Cell.

[30]  Philipp Stelter,et al.  Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation , 2003, Nature.

[31]  R. Woodgate,et al.  What a difference a decade makes: Insights into translesion DNA synthesis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Certain Pairs of Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes (E2s) and Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases (E3s) Synthesize Nondegradable Forked Ubiquitin Chains Containing All Possible Isopeptide Linkages* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  F. Yuan,et al.  Error-free and error-prone lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase kappa in vitro. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  F. Z. Watts,et al.  Postreplication repair and PCNA modification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[35]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  Human HLTF functions as a ubiquitin ligase for proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  J. Blow,et al.  PTIP/Swift is required for efficient PCNA ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. , 2008, DNA repair.

[37]  I. Hickson,et al.  The Bloom's Syndrome Helicase Can Promote the Regression of a Model Replication Fork* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  E. Friedberg,et al.  Erratum: Trading places: How do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? (Molecular Cell (May 27, 2005) 18 (499-505) PII: S1097-2765(05)01276-1 and DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.032) , 2005 .

[39]  M. Hochstrasser.  Lingering Mysteries of Ubiquitin-Chain Assembly , 2006, Cell.

[40]  E. Friedberg.  Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[41]  T. Kunkel,et al.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases , 2008, Cell Research.

[42]  S. West,et al.  The Bloom's syndrome gene product promotes branch migration of holliday junctions. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  L. Prakash,et al.  Requirement of Rad5 for DNA Polymerase ζ-Dependent Translesion Synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[44]  B. Strauss,et al.  A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  Y. Fujiwara,et al.  Replicative bypass repair of ultraviolet damage to DNA of mammalian cells: caffeine sensitive and caffeine resistant mechanisms. , 1976, Mutation research.

[46]  W. Xiao,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 group is composed of an error-prone and two error-free postreplication repair pathways. , 2000, Genetics.

[47]  S. West,et al.  Werner's syndrome protein (WRN) migrates Holliday junctions and co‐localizes with RPA upon replication arrest , 2000, EMBO reports.

[48]  W. Xiao,et al.  DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Mutation research.

[49]  Fenghua Yuan,et al.  Error-free and error-prone lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase κ in vitro , 2000 .

[50]  P. Burgers,et al.  Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases eta and REV1. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Andrzej Stasiak,et al.  The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[52]  Efterpi Papouli,et al.  Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[53]  P. Plevani,et al.  The 9-1-1 Checkpoint Clamp Physically Interacts with Polζ and Is Partially Required for Spontaneous Polζ-dependent Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Monoubiquitination of Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Induced by Stalled Replication Requires Uncoupling of DNA Polymerase and Mini-chromosome Maintenance Helicase Activities* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  L. Prakash,et al.  Yeast Rad5 Protein Required for Postreplication Repair Has a DNA Helicase Activity Specific for Replication Fork Regression , 2007, Molecular cell.

[56]  W. Xiao,et al.  MMS2, encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating-enzyme-like protein, is a member of the yeast error-free postreplication repair pathway. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  R. Mayer,et al.  Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[58]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Interplay among replicative and specialized DNA polymerases determines failure or success of translesion synthesis pathways. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  L. Aravind,et al.  The HIRAN Domain and Recruitment of Chromatin Remodeling and Repair activities to Damaged DNA , 2006, Cell cycle.

[60]  M. Pacek,et al.  Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. , 2005, Genes & development.

[61]  G. Wider,et al.  Ubiquitin-Binding Domains in Y-Family Polymerases Regulate Translesion Synthesis , 2005, Science.

[62]  M. Pacek,et al.  A requirement for MCM7 and Cdc45 in chromosome unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[63]  M. Whitby,et al.  The FANCM Ortholog Fml1 Promotes Recombination at Stalled Replication Forks and Limits Crossing Over during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2008, Molecular cell.

[64]  M. Yamaizumi,et al.  Rad18 Regulates DNA Polymerase κ and Is Required for Recovery from S-Phase Checkpoint-Mediated Arrest , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[65]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[66]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[67]  Boris Pfander,et al.  SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase , 2005, Nature.

[68]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  Human SHPRH is a ubiquitin ligase for Mms2–Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  J. Wysocka,et al.  It takes a PHD to SUMO. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[70]  Chikahide Masutani,et al.  The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η , 1999, Nature.

[71]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Mms2-Ubc13-Dependent and -Independent Roles of Rad5 Ubiquitin Ligase in Postreplication Repair and Translesion DNA Synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[72]  M. Lopes,et al.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[73]  A. Davies,et al.  Activation of Ubiquitin-Dependent DNA Damage Bypass Is Mediated by Replication Protein A , 2008, Molecular cell.

[74]  A. Constantinou,et al.  Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  W. Xiao,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA , 2008, Cell Research.

[76]  M. Lopes,et al.  Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[77]  E. Friedberg,et al.  Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? , 2005, Molecular cell.

[78]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Co-localization in replication foci and interaction of human Y-family members, DNA polymerase pol eta and REVl protein. , 2004, DNA repair.

[79]  Radhakrishnan Kanagaraj,et al.  Human RECQ5β helicase promotes strand exchange on synthetic DNA structures resembling a stalled replication fork , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[80]  K. Cimprich,et al.  The structural determinants of checkpoint activation. , 2007, Genes & development.

[81]  Craig A. Leach,et al.  Ubiquitin/SUMO modification of PCNA promotes replication fork progression in Xenopus laevis egg extracts , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[82]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Controlling the subcellular localization of DNA polymerases iota and eta via interactions with ubiquitin. , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[83]  J. Groden,et al.  The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins catalyze regression of a model replication fork. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[84]  T. Weinert,et al.  Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[85]  G. Walker,et al.  The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  S. Markowitz,et al.  Human SHPRH suppresses genomic instability through proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[87]  A. Lehmann.  Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. , 1972, Journal of molecular biology.

[88]  S. Markowitz,et al.  Polyubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen by HLTF and SHPRH prevents genomic instability from stalled replication forks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[89]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Poleta. , 1999, Science.

[90]  K. Kamiya,et al.  Role of Single-stranded DNA in Targeting REV1 to Primer Termini* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.