How Do Dietary Choices Influence the Energy-System Cost of Stabilizing the Climate?

We investigate how different global dietary scenarios affect the constraints on, and costs of, transforming the energy system to reach a global temperature stabilization limit of 2 °C above the pre-industrial level. A global food and agriculture model, World Food Supply Model (WOFSUM), is used to create three dietary scenarios and to calculate the CH 4 and N 2 O emissions resulting from their respective food-supply chains. The diets are: (i) a reference diet based on current trends; (ii) a diet with high (reference-level) meat consumption, but without ruminant products (i.e., no beef, lamb, or dairy, only pork and poultry); and (iii) a vegan diet. The estimated CH 4 and N 2 O emissions from food production are fed into a coupled energy and climate-system optimization model to quantify the energy system implications of the different dietary scenarios, given a 2 °C target. The results indicate that a phase-out of ruminant products substantially increases the emission space for CO 2 by about 250 GtC which reduces the necessary pace of the energy system transition and cuts the net present value energy-system mitigation costs by 25%, for staying below 2 °C. Importantly, the additional cost savings with a vegan diet––beyond those achieved with a phase-out of ruminant products––are marginal (only one additional percentage point). This means that a general reduction of meat consumption is a far less effective strategy for meeting the 2 °C target than a reduction of beef and dairy consumption.

[1]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[2]  E. Stehfest,et al.  RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C , 2011 .

[3]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility , 2013 .

[4]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Global Bioenergy Capacity as Constrained by Observed Biospheric Productivity Rates , 2012 .

[5]  Ron Milo,et al.  Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  U. Sonesson,et al.  How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture , 2016 .

[7]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security? , 2013 .

[8]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Impact of short-lived non-CO2 mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming , 2015 .

[9]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability , 2012, Energy policy.

[10]  Björn Andersson,et al.  Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints--cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector , 2003 .

[11]  Janet Ann ranganathan,et al.  Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future , 2016 .

[12]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system , 2011 .

[13]  G. Berndes,et al.  How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030 , 2010 .

[14]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies , 2014, Environmental Research Letters.

[15]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Climate benefits of changing diet , 2009 .

[16]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices , 2012 .

[17]  Niclas Mattsson,et al.  Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage , 2013 .

[18]  A. Carlsson-kanyama,et al.  Environmental impact of dietary change: a systematic review , 2015 .

[19]  M. Sutton,et al.  Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake , 2014 .

[20]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  An efficient and accurate representation of complex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake , 1996 .

[21]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[22]  A. Schotter,et al.  Endogenous Preferences : The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions , 1999 .

[23]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) , 2014 .

[24]  P. Thornton,et al.  Livestock and the Environment: What Have We Learned in the Past Decade? , 2015 .

[25]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock , 2013 .

[26]  Xiaoyuan Yan,et al.  Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced‐efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: meta‐analysis , 2009 .

[27]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[28]  S. Kurppa,et al.  Dietary choices and greenhouse gas emissions – assessment of impact of vegetarian and organic options at national scale , 2009 .

[29]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production , 2011 .

[30]  Jo Smith,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Detection and attribution of climate change: from global to regional , 2013 .

[32]  S. Wirsenius,et al.  The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets , 2014, Climatic Change.

[33]  Christian Azar,et al.  The Cost of Using Global Warming Potentials: Analysing the Trade off Between CO2, CH4 and N2O , 2006 .

[34]  P. Gerber,et al.  Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[35]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  Importance of non-CO2 emissions in carbon management , 2014 .

[36]  John R Porter,et al.  Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970–2050 , 2016, Global change biology.

[37]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing , 2006 .

[38]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's Long Shadow , 2006 .

[39]  U. Sonesson,et al.  Environmental impact of four meals with different protein sources: Case studies in Spain and Sweden , 2010 .

[40]  L. Soler,et al.  Improving diet sustainability through evolution of food choices: review of epidemiological studies on the environmental impact of diets , 2016, Nutrition reviews.

[41]  L. Mogensen,et al.  The global warming potential of two healthy Nordic diets compared with the average Danish diet , 2012, Climatic Change.

[42]  Daniel J.A. Johansson,et al.  Temperature stabilization, ocean heat uptake and radiative forcing overshoot profiles , 2011 .

[43]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation , 2014 .

[44]  Sten Karlsson,et al.  Cost-effective energy carriers for transport – The role of the energy supply system in a carbon-constrained world , 2010 .