Guidance for the assessment of treatment moderation and patients ’ preferences 4

[1]  F. Rabiee.  Focus-group interview and data analysis , 2004, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[2]  Richard L Kravitz,et al.  Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge? , 2009, Trials.

[3]  Angela Robinson,et al.  Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead. , 2006, Health economics.

[4]  O. Sibony,et al.  Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Richard E Ashcroft,et al.  Virtual community consultation? Using the literature and weblogs to link community perspectives and health technology assessment , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  S. Assmann,et al.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials , 2000, The Lancet.

[7]  P. Stevens.  Focus groups: collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. , 1996, Public health nursing.

[8]  D. Cook,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[9]  M. Longley,et al.  From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research. , 2007, Nurse education today.

[10]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. , 2012, Health economics.

[11]  J. Kitzinger.  The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants , 1994 .

[12]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  K C Cain,et al.  Measuring Preferences for Health States Worse than Death , 1994, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[15]  J. Bigger.  Issues in Subgroup Analyses and Meta‐Analyses of Clinical Trials , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[16]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Explaining Distortions in Utility Elicitation through the Rank-dependent Model for Risky Choices , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  Stephen Joel Coons,et al.  US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.

[18]  Karina Lovell,et al.  How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of 'expert' within Delphi panel techniques. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[19]  Xin Sun,et al.  Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. , 2012, Health economics.

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials , 2009, Trials.

[23]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. , 1989 .

[24]  P. Dolan,et al.  Time preference, duration and health state valuations. , 1995, Health economics.

[25]  Dieter Hoffmann,et al.  Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research , 2013 .

[26]  Claire Anderson,et al.  Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research , 2010, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[27]  Bas Donkers,et al.  Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide , 2015, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

[28]  David Feeny,et al.  Multi-Attribute Preference Functions , 1995, PharmacoEconomics.

[29]  M. O’Reilly,et al.  ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research , 2013 .

[30]  Roy C. Schmidt,et al.  MANAGING DELPHI SURVEYS USING NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[31]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Testing for consistency in willingness to pay experiments , 2000 .

[32]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[33]  Julie Ratcliffe,et al.  Harnessing the Potential to Quantify Public Preferences for Healthcare Priorities Through Citizens’ Juries , 2014, International journal of health policy and management.

[34]  J. Louviere,et al.  Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[35]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force. , 2006, Chest.

[36]  C. Webb,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN NURSING RESEARCH 2 Focus groups as a research method : a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research , 2001 .

[37]  D. Menon,et al.  Engaging the public in priority‐setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens’ jury , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[38]  Andrew Lloyd,et al.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[39]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis , 2013, Patient preference and adherence.

[40]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential , 2013 .

[41]  G H Guyatt,et al.  A Consumer's Guide to Subgroup Analyses , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  C. Cook.  Mode of administration bias , 2010, The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy.

[43]  P. Gill,et al.  Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups , 2008, BDJ.

[44]  Wendy O Baird,et al.  Delphi research: issues raised by a pilot study. , 2012, Nurse researcher.

[45]  P. Katrak,et al.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[46]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data , 1991 .

[47]  Mn DipN Cert Ed Rgn Scm and Janice Rattray PhD.  Essential elements of questionnaire design and development , 2007 .

[48]  Amery D. Wu,et al.  Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators , 2008 .

[49]  B. Burnand,et al.  The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual , 2001 .

[50]  A. Booth,et al.  Should We Exclude Inadequately Reported Studies From Qualitative Systematic Reviews? An Evaluation of Sensitivity Analyses in Two Case Study Reviews , 2012, Qualitative health research.

[51]  Phil Edwards,et al.  Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration , 2010, Trials.

[52]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[53]  Cynthia Iglesias,et al.  Does Length of Questionnaire Matter? A Randomised Trial of Response Rates to a Mailed Questionnaire , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[54]  J. Lenaghan,et al.  Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens juries. , 1999, Health policy.

[55]  N. Greenwood,et al.  The influence of ethnic group composition on focus group discussions , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[56]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Design of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Discussion of Issues That Matter in Future Applied Research , 2011 .

[57]  M Ryan,et al.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[58]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Critically appraising qualitative research , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[59]  Deborah Marshall,et al.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[60]  Mickael Bech,et al.  Designing a stated choice experiment: The value of a qualitative process , 2012 .

[61]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[62]  Eleanor McLellan,et al.  Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription , 2003 .

[63]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[64]  A. Hyde,et al.  The focus group method: insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[65]  Cindy Passmore,et al.  Guidelines for constructing a survey. , 2002, Family medicine.

[66]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool* , 2006, Inf. Vis..

[67]  N. Leech,et al.  Toward More Rigor in Focus Group Research: A New Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Focus Group Data , 2009 .

[68]  C. Cook.  Potential Pitfalls of Clinical Prediction Rules , 2008, The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy.

[69]  J. Wittes,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. , 1991, JAMA.

[70]  M. Versteegh,et al.  Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[71]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[72]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[73]  J Clark,et al.  How to peer review a qualitative manuscript , 2003 .

[74]  S. Sheather,et al.  Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review , 1988, Psychological Medicine.

[75]  T. Peters,et al.  Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. , 2007, Journal of health economics.

[76]  Kathleenl N. Lohr,et al.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[77]  J. Sitzia,et al.  Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. , 2003, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[78]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies , 2013 .

[79]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A Systematic Review to Identify the Use of Preference Elicitation Methods in Healthcare Decision Making , 2014, Pharmaceutical Medicine.

[80]  Scott Reeves,et al.  An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[81]  A. Braunack-Mayer,et al.  The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[82]  Mechthild Meyer,et al.  Improving Accuracy of Transcripts in Qualitative Research , 2004, Qualitative health research.

[83]  The duration effect: a link between TTO and VAS values. , 2009, Health economics.

[84]  W. Viechtbauer.  Analysis of moderator effects in meta-analysis , 2008 .

[85]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[86]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Desperately Seeking Dissonance , 2013, Qualitative health research.

[87]  K. Facey,et al.  Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[88]  J. Novak,et al.  The theory underlying concept maps , 2016 .

[89]  L. Lamers.  The Transformation of Utilities for Health States Worse Than Death: Consequences for the Estimation of EQ-5D Value Sets , 2007, Medical care.

[90]  M. Sprangers,et al.  Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[91]  P. Ubel,et al.  An alternative approach for eliciting willingness-to-pay: A randomized Internet trial , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[92]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[93]  A. Hoes,et al.  Confounding of subgroup analyses in randomized data. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[94]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[95]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[96]  J. Cairns,et al.  Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report. , 2014, Health technology assessment.

[97]  L. Lach,et al.  Processes of Metastudy: A Study of Psychosocial Adaptation to Childhood Chronic Health Conditions , 2006 .

[98]  E McColl,et al.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[99]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[100]  B. Crabtree,et al.  The qualitative research interview , 2006, Medical education.

[101]  A. Irvine.  Duration, Dominance and Depth in Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews: A Comparative Exploration , 2011 .

[102]  Kim P. Corfman,et al.  the Importance of Member Homogeneity to Focus Group Quality , 1995 .

[103]  Edward T. Cokely,et al.  Using Visual Aids to Improve Communication of Risks about Health: A Review , 2012, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[104]  Barbara McPake,et al.  How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. , 2009, Health policy and planning.

[105]  Anne E. Fortune,et al.  Qualitative research in social work , 1994 .

[106]  Alice Bloch,et al.  Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires and observation , 2011 .

[107]  E. Waclawski.  Health Measurement Scales—A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use , 2010 .

[108]  M. Meade,et al.  A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[109]  C. Ham.  Health services research methods: a guide to best practice , 2000 .

[110]  Stephanie J. C. Taylor,et al.  Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[111]  Carmen R. Wilson VanVoorhis,et al.  Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes , 2007 .