Effects of Prior Knowledge Activation Modes and Text Structure on Nonscience Majors’ Comprehension of Physics

AbstractOur purpose in this study was to investigate a pragmatic, low-cost way to enhance student learning of complex science concepts without totally revamping texts or methods of instruction. Undergraduate nonscience majors (N = 62) with known naive conceptions about projectile motion were randomly assigned to one of six groups formed from three levels of a prior knowledge activation activity and two levels of text. The results of a multivariate analysis of variance showed that activating competent readers’ naive conceptions about a complex science concept is not as effective a means for dispelling inaccurate information as is the practice of activating their naive conceptions and then explicitly directing them to read and attend to ideas that might differ from their own. This result and the no difference found for refutation text are discussed within the context of earlier work and Kintsch’s (1980) observation that incongruity leads to new learning.

[1]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  Comprehension of Counterintuitive Science Text: Effects of Prior Knowledge and Text Structure , 1989 .

[2]  John Zeuli The Use of the Zone of Proximal Development in Everyday and School Contexts: A Vygotskian Critique. , 1986 .

[3]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics , 1980 .

[4]  W. Kintsch Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway , 1980 .

[5]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  The Role of Refutation Text in Overcoming Difficulty with Science Concepts. College Reading and Learning Assistance Technical Report 85-08. , 1985 .

[6]  Katherine Maria,et al.  Learning from texts that refute the reader's prior knowledge , 1987 .

[7]  Edward B. Fry,et al.  Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, Validity, and Extension to Level 17. , 1977 .

[8]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  Prior Knowledge Activation and the Comprehension of Compatible and Incompatible Text. , 1985 .

[9]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[11]  Marjorie Youmans Lipson,et al.  The Influence of Religious Affiliation on Children's Memory for Text Information. , 1983 .

[12]  J. Peeck,et al.  Effect of mobilizing prior knowledge on learning from text. , 1982 .

[13]  J. Clement Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[14]  E. Frenkel-Brunswik,et al.  Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. , 1949, Psychological issues.

[15]  Yuichiro Anzai,et al.  Internal Models in Physics Problem Solving , 1984 .