The Use of Vibration Data for Damage Detection in Bridges: A Comparison of System Identification and Pattern Recognition Approaches

This paper briefly outlines the rationale for structural health monitoring as an integral component of bridge management systems. Two different approaches, system identification and statistical pattern recognition, are summarised and applied in turn to vibration data collected from three scale modelreinforced concrete bridges. The results show that the system identification paradigm can successfully locate and quantify the damage to the decks when they are loaded to incipient collapse, especially when experience is used to determine the parameters to use in the finite element updating procedure. However, the study also demonstrated that this approach requires a large amount of high quality data, requirements that cannot always be met readily in the field. In contrast, although the statistical pattern recognition approach was not able to quantify or locate the damage, it was able to clearly indicate that damage had occurred from relatively few measurements. A comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches suggests that they should be used in a complementary manner. The statistical pattern recognition approach can be employed as a simple, cost efficient way to indicate that damage has occurred. It can then trigger a more detailed investigation using system identification.

[1]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Process Control , 2000 .

[2]  O. S. Salawu Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[3]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage , 1992 .

[4]  Fabrizio Vestroni,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION IN BEAM STRUCTURES BASED ON FREQUENCY MEASUREMENTS , 2000 .

[5]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  K. V. D. Abeele,et al.  Damage assessment in reinforced concrete using spectral and temporal nonlinear vibration techniques , 2000 .

[7]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Studies of the Alamosa Canyon and I-40 Bridges , 2000 .

[8]  Mohammad Noori,et al.  Wavelet-Based Approach for Structural Damage Detection , 2000 .

[9]  Sung-Pil Chang,et al.  Experimental Investigation of System-Identification-Based Damage Assessment on Structures , 2002 .

[10]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Model Updating In Structural Dynamics: A Survey , 1993 .

[11]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques , 2001 .

[12]  H. A. Cole,et al.  On-line failure detection and damping measurement of aerospace structures by random decrement signatures , 1973 .

[13]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION USING MODAL DATA. II: TEST VERIFICATION , 2002 .

[14]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge , 1999 .

[16]  Keith Worden,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[17]  C. Farrar,et al.  SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FROM AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS ON A BRIDGE , 1997 .

[18]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Structural Damage Assessment Based on Wavelet Packet Transform , 2002 .

[19]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[20]  Irina Trendafilova Pattern Recognition Methods for Damage Diagnosis in Structures from Vibration Measurements , 2001 .

[21]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies , 1979 .

[22]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION USING MODAL DATA. I: SIMULATION VERIFICATION , 2002 .

[23]  S.R. Pearson,et al.  The Use of Vibration Signatures to Detect Flexural Cracking in Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks , 2001 .

[24]  Mehmet Imregun,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MEASURED FRF DATA REDUCED VIA PRINCIPAL COMPONENT PROJECTION , 2001 .

[25]  P. Mahalanobis On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .

[26]  Benjamin A. Graybeal,et al.  RELIABILITY OF VISUAL INSPECTION FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES, VOLUME I: FINAL REPORT , 2001 .

[27]  Keith Worden,et al.  STRUCTURAL FAULT DETECTION USING A NOVELTY MEASURE , 1997 .

[28]  John S. Owen,et al.  The application of auto–regressive time series modelling for the time–frequency analysis of civil engineering structures , 2001 .

[29]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .

[30]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs mode-shape-based method , 2003 .

[31]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[32]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[33]  Nicholas Haritos,et al.  Direct Simultaneous Modal Approximation Method , 1996 .