Antigen Retrieval of Basement Membrane Proteins from Archival Eye Tissues

Antigen retrieval (AR) methods can unmask tissue antigens that have been altered by fixation, processing, storage, or resin interactions. This is particularly important in the study of archival tissues, because primary fixatives and storage times may vary among specimens. We performed an electron microscopic study of basement membrane components of the aqueous humor drainage pathways from archival eye tissue. AR (heated citrate buffer, pH 6.0, LR White resin) increased the amount of label of collagen IV and fibronectin in tissue fixed in four different fixatives, including those containing glutaraldehyde. Labeling density was approximately doubled after AR for most fixatives, with the largest increase for tissues fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/2% glutaraldehyde. Duration of storage time for archival tissues did not affect AR results. AR did not change the components of the extracellular matrix labeled; no “new” components were labeled after AR. We conclude that AR in citrate buffer can be used on selected extracellular matrix antigens to enhance label that would otherwise be lost due to fixation and storage.

[1]  A. Mighell,et al.  An overview of the complexities and subtleties of immunohistochemistry. , 2008, Oral diseases.

[2]  A. Leong,et al.  Microwave procedures for electron microscopy and resin-embedded sections. , 1998, Micron.

[3]  S. Brorson The combination of high-accelerator epoxy resin and antigen retrieval to obtain more intense immunolabeling on epoxy sections than on LR-white sections for large proteins. , 1998, Micron.

[4]  D. Johnson,et al.  The effect of cytochalasin D on outflow facility and the trabecular meshwork of the human eye in perfusion organ culture. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  S. Pileri,et al.  Antigen retrieval techniques in immunohistochemistry: comparison of different methods , 1997, The Journal of pathology.

[6]  R. Cote,et al.  Antigen Retrieval Immunohistochemistry: Past, Present, and Future , 1997, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[7]  R. Cote,et al.  Comparative study of antigen retrieval heating methods: microwave, microwave and pressure cooker, autoclave, and steamer. , 1996, Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission.

[8]  J. Stirling,et al.  Antigen unmasking for immunoelectron microscopy: labeling is improved by treating with sodium ethoxide or sodium metaperiodate, then heating on retrieval medium. , 1995, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[9]  R. Cote,et al.  Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the influence of pH using monoclonal antibodies. , 1995, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[10]  Johannes Gerdes,et al.  Antigen unmasking on formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue sections , 1993, The Journal of pathology.

[11]  G. E. Marshall,et al.  Immunogold localization of type IV collagen and laminin in the aging human outflow system. , 1990, Experimental eye research.

[12]  G. Newman 4 – LR White Embedding Medium for Colloidal Gold Methods GEOFFREY , 1989 .

[13]  E. Kellenberger,et al.  The efficiency of immunolabel on Lowicryl sections compared to theoretical predictions. , 1987, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[14]  M. Hayat 1 – Chemical Fixation , 1986 .

[15]  J. Rohen Why is intraocular pressure elevated in chronic simple glaucoma? Anatomical considerations. , 1983, Ophthalmology.