Challenge of normality evaluation by using micro-size tension measurement device in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is one of the important ligaments in the knee. The ACL connects the femur and tibia, and has a role to prevent an excessive forward movement of the tibia. In the clinical sports medicine, ACL reconstruction is often preformed about the injured knee. The ACL reconstruction aims to recover the function of the knee. Although some studies have reported tension pattern of the reconstructed knee during knee bending, no reports have reported an evaluation method of a normal tension pattern. This study challenges to define the normality of the normal knee in considering with the tension pattern. The experiment used an imitation bone with imitation ligaments for measuring the tension pattern by using our developed micro-measurement system, and evaluated the normality of the tension pattern. A future work is to apply this evaluation to cadaver knees.

[1]  Carsten Perka,et al.  The biological and biomechanical effect of different graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an experimental study , 2002, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[2]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  R. Buzzi,et al.  Femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three techniques. A cadaver study. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[4]  Kouki Nagamune,et al.  The effect of graft tensioning in anatomic 2-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee joint kinematics , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  N. Adachi,et al.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  Jeremy Suggs,et al.  The effect of graft stiffness on knee joint biomechanics after ACL reconstruction--a 3D computational simulation. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Kouki Nagamune,et al.  Clinical grading of the pivot shift test correlates best with tibial acceleration , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: Biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. , 2001, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  Kouki Nagamune,et al.  Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[11]  Christian Haid,et al.  Modified Prusik knot versus whipstitch technique for soft tissue fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.