An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: Case study research

Currently the most popular approach in socio hydrology is to develop coupled human–water models. This article proposes an alternative approach, qualitative case study research, involving a systematic review of (1) the human activities affecting the hydrology in the case, (2) the main human actors, and (3) the main factors influencing the actors and their activities. Moreover, this article presents a case study of the Dommel Basin in Belgium and the Netherlands, and compares this with a coupled model of the Kissimmee Basin in Florida. In both basins a “pendulum swing” from water resources development and control to protection and restoration can be observed. The Dommel case study moreover points to the importance of institutional and financial arrangements, community values, and broader social, economic, and technical developments. These factors are missing from the Kissimmee model. Generally, case studies can result in a more complete understanding of individual cases than coupled models, and if the cases are selected carefully and compared with previous studies, it is possible to generalize on the basis of them. Case studies also offer more levers for management and facilitate interdisciplinary cooperation. Coupled models, on the other hand, can be used to generate possible explanations of past developments and quantitative scenarios for future developments. The article concludes that, given the limited attention they currently get and their potential benefits, case studies deserve more attention in sociohydrology.

[1]  De waterstaatstoestanden in Noord-Brabant binnen het stroomgebied der Maas - voorheen en thans - uit een economisch en landbouwkundig oogpunt beschouwd , 1927 .

[2]  D. R. Mansholt.  Beschouwingen over een onderzoek naar de waterschapslasten in Nederland , 1941 .

[3]  R. Levins.  The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[4]  Lobbying, Administrative Reform and Policy Styles. The Case of Land Drainage , 1978 .

[5]  H. Godwin,et al.  Fenland: Its Ancient Past and Uncertain Future , 1979 .

[6]  H. Darby.  The Changing Fenland , 1983 .

[7]  A.H. Crijns, F.W.J. Kriellaars, Het gemengde landbouwbedrijf op de zandgronden in Noord-Brabant 1800-1885 , 1989 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[10]  J. Coles,et al.  Fenland survey : an essay in landscape and persistence , 1997 .

[11]  荒木 宏之,et al.  Man-made lowlands : History of water management and land reclamation in the Netherlands , 1997 .

[12]  A. H. Crijns.  Van overgang naar omwenteling in de Brabantse land- en tuinbouw 1950-1985; Schaalvergroting en specialisatie , 1998 .

[13]  E. Barham.  Ecological Boundaries as Community Boundaries: The Politics of Watersheds , 2001 .

[14]  Hugh Ward,et al.  Social Capital and the Environment , 2001 .

[15]  Frances Cleaver,et al.  Reinventing Institutions: Bricolage and the Social Embeddedness of Natural Resource Management , 2002 .

[16]  Arterial drainage in inter-war England: the legislative perspective* , 2002 .

[17]  Cornelis Disco,et al.  Remaking “Nature”: The Ecological Turn in Dutch Water Management , 2002 .

[18]  Erik Mostert,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive and water management research , 2003 .

[19]  J. Knote.  Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[20]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[21]  KA Thleen,et al.  Building Theories from Case Study , 2007 .

[22]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Adaptive and integrated water management , 2008 .

[23]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  HESS Opinions "The art of hydrology" , 2008 .

[24]  Erik Mostert,et al.  Integrated Water Resources Management in The Netherlands: How Concepts Function , 2009 .

[25]  Enquête beek(dal)herstelprojecten 2004-2008 : evaluatie van beekherstel over de periode 1960-2008 en analyse van effecten van 9 voorbeeldprojecten , 2009 .

[26]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems: The Role of Social Capital , 2009 .

[27]  Dave Huitema,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Realizing Water Transitions: The Role of Policy Entrepreneurs in Water Policy Change Realizing water transitions: the role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change , 2010 .

[28]  E. Mostert.  Water management on the Island of Ijsselmonde 1000-1953: Reflections on the theory of polycentric governance , 2011 .

[29]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[30]  Simulation of Resilience of an Insurance System to Flood Risk , 2012 .

[31]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Socio‐hydrology: A new science of people and water , 2012 .

[32]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  The nature and causes of the global water crisis: Syndromes from a meta‐analysis of coupled human‐water studies , 2012 .

[33]  E. Mostert.  Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification , 2012 .

[34]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Socio-hydrology: conceptualising human-flood interactions , 2013 .

[35]  James L. Wescoat,et al.  Reconstructing the duty of water: a study of emergent norms in socio-hydrology , 2013 .

[36]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use-inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene , 2013 .

[37]  Patricia Gober,et al.  Socio-hydrology and the science–policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin , 2013 .

[38]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk - Roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust , 2013 .

[39]  S. Lane.  Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world , 2013 .

[40]  András Zlinszky,et al.  Historic maps as a data source for socio-hydrology: a case study of the Lake Balaton wetland system, Hungary , 2013 .

[41]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world , 2013 .

[42]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji-Tire model , 2013 .

[43]  E. Araral,et al.  Ostrom, Hardin and the Commons: A Critical Appreciation and a Revisionist View , 2013 .

[44]  Noelwah R. Netusil,et al.  Relationships between environmental governance and water quality in a growing metropolitan area of the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2014 .

[45]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Socio-hydrologic drivers of the pendulum swing between agricultural development and environmental health: a case study from Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia , 2014 .

[46]  D. Benson,et al.  Evaluating participation in WFD river basin management in England and Wales: Processes, communities, outputs and outcomes , 2014 .

[47]  Children’s books as a historical source: flooding in 20th century dutch children’s books , 2015, Water History.

[48]  E. Mostert,et al.  Conflicts over Natural Resources in the Global South – Conceptual Approaches , 2014 .

[49]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Socio-hydrologic modeling to understand and mediate the competition for water between agriculture development and environmental health : Murrumbidgee River Basin, Australia , 2014 .

[50]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology: identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach , 2014 .

[51]  P. Mollinga,et al.  Finding structure in diversity: A stepwise small-N/medium-N qualitative comparative analysis approach for water resources management research , 2014 .

[52]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Time scale interactions and the coevolution of humans and water , 2015 .

[53]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Debates—Perspectives on socio‐hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes , 2015 .

[54]  Erik Mostert,et al.  Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibilities , 2015 .

[55]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Water conservation and hydrological transitions in cities in the United States , 2015 .

[56]  Janaine Z. Coletti,et al.  A model of the socio‐hydrologic dynamics in a semiarid catchment: Isolating feedbacks in the coupled human‐hydrology system , 2015 .

[57]  Veena Srinivasan,et al.  Reimagining the past. Use of counterfactual trajectories in socio-hydrological modelling: The case of Chennai, India , 2015 .

[58]  Tom P. Evans,et al.  Debates—Perspectives on socio‐hydrology: Socio‐hydrologic modeling: Tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation , 2015 .

[59]  Shafiqul Islam,et al.  A question driven socio-hydrological modeling process , 2015 .

[60]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  A sociohydrological model for smallholder farmers in Maharashtra, India , 2016 .

[61]  Erik Mostert,et al.  Between arguments, interests and expertise: the institutional development of the Dutch water boards, 1953-present , 2017, Water History.

[62]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Data-driven modelling approaches for socio-hydrology: opportunities and challenges within the Panta Rhei Science Plan , 2016 .

[63]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Conceptualizing socio‐hydrological drought processes: The case of the Maya collapse , 2016, Water resources research.

[64]  A. Vedlitz,et al.  Personal characteristics, local environmental conditions, and individual environmental concern: a multilevel analysis , 2016 .

[65]  Karin Aggestam,et al.  Depoliticizing water conflict: functional peacebuilding in the Red Sea–Dead Sea Water Conveyance project , 2016 .

[66]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Prediction in a socio-hydrological world , 2016 .

[67]  Johanna Gramesa,et al.  Modeling the interaction between flooding events and economic growth , 2016 .

[68]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Culture, climate change and farm-level groundwater management: An Australian case study , 2016 .

[69]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  From channelization to restoration: Sociohydrologic modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida , 2016 .

[70]  J. Newig,et al.  Participation for effective environmental governance? Evidence from Water Framework Directive implementation in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[71]  Wouter Buytaert,et al.  Socio-hydrological modelling: a review asking "why, what and how?" , 2016 .

[72]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  Evolution of the societal value of water resources for economic development versus environmental sustainability in Australia from 1843 to 2011 , 2017 .

[73]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Prediction in a socio-hydrological world , 2017 .

[74]  G. Aronica,et al.  Human-flood interactions in Rome over the past 150 years , 2017 .

[75]  M. Ehsan Shafiee,et al.  Agent-based modeling to simulate the dynamics of urban water supply: Climate, population growth, and water shortages , 2017 .

[76]  G. di Baldassarre,et al.  Impact of social preparedness on flood early warning systems , 2017 .

[77]  Venkatesh Merwade,et al.  Incorporating institutions and collective action into a sociohydrological model of flood resilience , 2017 .

[78]  S. Junier.  Modelling expertise: Experts and expertise in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[79]  Anna Wesselink,et al.  Socio‐hydrology and hydrosocial analysis: toward dialogues across disciplines , 2017 .

[80]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Progress in socio‐hydrology: a meta‐analysis of challenges and opportunities , 2017 .

[81]  Erik Mostert.  An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: Case study research , 2017 .

[82]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Role of Sectoral Transformation in the Evolution of Water Management Norms in Agricultural Catchments: A Sociohydrologic Modeling Analysis , 2017 .

[83]  Ximing Cai,et al.  On the role of individuals in models of coupled human and natural systems: Lessons from a case study in the Republican River Basin , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[84]  Galen Treuer,et al.  A narrative method for analyzing transitions in urban water management: The case of the Miami‐Dade Water and Sewer Department , 2017 .

[85]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A dynamic framework for flood risk , 2017 .

[86]  E. Mostert.  River basin management and community: the Great Ouse Basin, 1850–present , 2018 .

[87]  ศิวะพร ภู่พันธ์,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2018 .