Higher cognitive ability is associated with lower entries in a p-beauty contest

"Beauty contests" are well-studied, dominance-solvable games that generate two interesting results. First, most behavior does not conform to the unique Nash equilibrium. Second, there is considerable unexplained heterogeneity in behavior. In this work, we explore the relationship between beauty contest behavior and cognitive ability. We find that subjects with high cognitive ability exhibit behavior that is closer to the Nash equilibrium.

[1]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .

[2]  Richard H. Thaler Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 14, Number 1—Winter 2000—Pages 133–141 From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens , 2022 .

[3]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[4]  A. Falk,et al.  Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability? , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  The control of game form recognition in experiments: understanding dominant strategy failures in a simple two person “guessing” game , 2009 .

[6]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[7]  J. T. Warner,et al.  The Personal Discount Rate: Evidence from Military Downsizing Programs , 2001 .

[8]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Iterated Dominance and Iterated Best-Response in Experimental P-Beauty Contests , 1998 .

[9]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Genetic Variation in Preferences for Giving and Risk Taking , 2009 .

[10]  R. Nagel Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 1995 .

[11]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Altruistic Behavior as a Costly Signal of General Intelligence , 2006 .

[12]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Why Experiment in economics , 1999 .

[13]  Andreas Ortmann,et al.  Three Very Simple Games and What it Takes to Solve Them , 2008 .

[14]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[15]  Jean-Robert Tyran,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 43–66 Individual Irrationality and Aggregate Outcomes , 2022 .

[16]  J. Heckman,et al.  Three observations on wages and measured cognitive ability , 2001 .

[17]  John Duffy,et al.  On the Robustness of Behaviour in Experimental ‘Beauty Contest’ Games , 1997 .

[18]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[19]  Garett Jones,et al.  Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner's dilemma experiments, 1959–2003 , 2008 .

[20]  J. List Does market experience eliminate market anomalies , 2003 .

[21]  David C. Geary,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2004 .