Classifying the LOD cloud

Massive amounts of data from different contexts and producers are collected and connected relying often solely on statistical techniques. Problems to the acclaimed value of data lie in the precise definition of data and associated contexts as well as the problem that data are not always published in meaningful and open ways. The Linked Data paradigm offers a solution to the limitations of simple keywords by having unique, resolvable and shared identifiers instead of strings This paper reports on a three-year research project “Digging Into the Knowledge Graph,” funded as part of the 2016 Round Four Digging Into Data Challenge (https://diggingintodata.org/awards/2016/project/digging-knowledge-graph). Our project involves comparing terminology employed within the LOD cloud with terminology employed within two general but different KOSs – Universal Decimal Classification and Basic Concepts Classification. We are exploring whether these classifications can encourage greater consistency in LOD terminology and linking the largely distinct scholarly literatures that address LOD and KOSs. Our project is an attempt to connect the Linked Open Data community, which has tended to be centered in computer science, and the KO community, with members from linguistics, metaphysics, library and information science. We focus on the shared challenges related to Big Data between both communities.

[1]  Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan,et al.  Implications of big data for knowledge organization. , 2017 .

[2]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  Big data privacy: The datafication of personal information , 2016, Inf. Soc..

[3]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[4]  Daniel Martínez-Ávila,et al.  Retos y oportunidades en organización del conocimiento en la intersección con las tecnologías de la información , 2014 .

[5]  László Lukács The information society and the Church , 1997, Internet Res..

[6]  Ali Shiri,et al.  Linked Data Meets Big Data: A Knowledge Organization Systems Perspective , 2014 .

[7]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Knowledge Organization (KO) , 2016 .

[8]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  Unleashing the Power of Data Through Organization: Structure and Connections for Meaning, Learning, and Discovery , 2015 .

[9]  Daniel Martínez-Ávila Knowledge Organization in the Intersection with Information Technologies , 2015 .

[10]  D. Rooney,et al.  Big data, little wisdom: trouble brewing? Ethical implications for the information systems discipline , 2015 .

[11]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Big Data , 2014, Wirtschaftsinf..

[12]  Ana Peraica,et al.  Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World , 2016, Leonardo.

[13]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theories are Knowledge Organizing Systems (KOS) , 2015 .

[14]  Tony Hey,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery , 2009 .

[15]  Michael L. Brodie,et al.  The meaningful use of big data: four perspectives -- four challenges , 2012, SGMD.

[16]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Understanding Data Retrieval Practices: A Social Informatics Perspective , 2018, ArXiv.

[17]  Rick Szostak,et al.  Connecting KOSs and the LOD Cloud , 2018, ArXiv.

[18]  Fulvio Mazzocchi,et al.  Could Big Data be the end of theory in science? , 2015, EMBO reports.