Neural Underpinnings of the Identifiable Victim Effect: Affect Shifts Preferences for Giving

The “identifiable victim effect” refers to peoples' tendency to preferentially give to identified versus anonymous victims of misfortune, and has been proposed to partly depend on affect. By soliciting charitable donations from human subjects during behavioral and neural (i.e., functional magnetic resonance imaging) experiments, we sought to determine whether and how affect might promote the identifiable victim effect. Behaviorally, subjects gave more to orphans depicted by photographs versus silhouettes, and their shift in preferences was mediated by photograph-induced feelings of positive arousal, but not negative arousal. Neurally, while photographs versus silhouettes elicited activity in widespread circuits associated with facial and affective processing, only nucleus accumbens activity predicted and could statistically account for increased donations. Together, these findings suggest that presenting evaluable identifiable information can recruit positive arousal, which then promotes giving. We propose that affect elicited by identifiable stimuli can compel people to give more to strangers, even despite costs to the self.

[1]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual? , 2005 .

[2]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  Jonathan E. Taylor,et al.  Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  Catie Chang,et al.  Effects of model-based physiological noise correction on default mode network anti-correlations and correlations , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  J. Andreoni IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[7]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Distributed Neural Representation of Expected Value , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Andreoni Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments , 1995 .

[9]  A M Dale,et al.  Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[11]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[12]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Is Empathic Emotion a Source of Altruistic Motivation , 1981 .

[13]  Enrico Rubaltelli,et al.  The emotional cost of charitable donations , 2012, Cognition & emotion.

[14]  Carrie L. Masten,et al.  An fMRI investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behavior , 2011, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Vaidya,et al.  The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence , 1999 .

[16]  K. Preuschoff,et al.  Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members' Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping , 2010, Neuron.

[17]  J. Andreoni,et al.  Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising , 2004 .

[18]  Kevin L. Harrell,et al.  Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Daniel T. Knoepfle,et al.  Value Computations in Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Charitable Decision Making Incorporate Input from Regions Involved in Social Cognition , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[21]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  The science of giving : experimental approaches to the study of charity , 2011 .

[22]  K. Ochsner,et al.  The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Tania Singer,et al.  University of Zurich Zurich Open Repository and Archive I Feel How You Feel but Not Always: the Empathic Brain and Its I Feel How You Feel but Not Always: the Empathic Brain and Its Modulation , 2009 .

[24]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing , 1997 .

[26]  J. Grafman,et al.  Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipatory affect: neural correlates and consequences for choice , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[29]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  The Face of Need: Facial Emotion Expression on Charity Advertisements , 2009 .

[30]  A. Culyer Identifiable Victim Effect , 2014 .

[31]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[33]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  General Evaluability Theory , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[34]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  The Life you Save May Be Your Own , 1968 .

[35]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt , 1998 .

[36]  G. Elliott Wimmer,et al.  Neural Antecedents of the Endowment Effect , 2008, Neuron.

[37]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Valence and salience contribute to nucleus accumbens activation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[38]  Claus Lamm,et al.  The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations , 2005 .

[40]  Ronald Bosman,et al.  Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-Take Experiment , 2002 .

[41]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Heart Strings and Purse Strings , 2004, Psychological science.

[42]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations , 2007, Science.

[44]  J. Decety,et al.  A Social-Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy , 2006 .