The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?

Women comprise a minority of the Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine (STEMM) workforce. Quantifying the gender gap may identify fields that will not reach parity without intervention, reveal underappreciated biases, and inform benchmarks for gender balance among conference speakers, editors, and hiring committees. Using the PubMed and arXiv databases, we estimated the gender of 36 million authors from >100 countries publishing in >6000 journals, covering most STEMM disciplines over the last 15 years, and made a web app allowing easy access to the data (https://lukeholman.github.io/genderGap/). Despite recent progress, the gender gap appears likely to persist for generations, particularly in surgery, computer science, physics, and maths. The gap is especially large in authorship positions associated with seniority, and prestigious journals have fewer women authors. Additionally, we estimate that men are invited by journals to submit papers at approximately double the rate of women. Wealthy countries, notably Japan, Germany, and Switzerland, had fewer women authors than poorer ones. We conclude that the STEMM gender gap will not close without further reforms in education, mentoring, and academic publishing.

[1]  Jennifer L. Martin,et al.  Ten Simple Rules to Achieve Conference Speaker Gender Balance , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[3]  Filippo Radicchi,et al.  Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender , 2016, PLoS biology.

[4]  Molly Carnes,et al.  Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender. , 2014, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[5]  Sarah Huggett,et al.  Gender in the Global Research Landscape raw data , 2017 .

[6]  Rachelle S. Heller,et al.  Mind the Gap: Women in STEM Career Breaks , 2010 .

[7]  Shilad Sen,et al.  Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  The write position , 2007, EMBO reports.

[10]  D. Conley,et al.  Gender matters: A call to commission more women writers , 2012, Nature.

[11]  Emily Nicholson,et al.  Accounting for career breaks. , 2015, Science.

[12]  Friederike Mengel,et al.  Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  How to Make More Published Research True , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[15]  Brooks Hanson,et al.  Journals invite too few women to referee , 2017, Nature.

[16]  Penelope Lockwood,et al.  “Someone Like Me can be Successful”: Do College Students Need Same-Gender Role Models? , 2006 .

[17]  E. Garfield The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[18]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[19]  Ben A. Barres,et al.  Does gender matter? , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[21]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests , 2017, Science.

[22]  M Linzer,et al.  Results of a Gender‐climate and Work‐environment Survey at a Midwestern Academic Health Center , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[23]  Mary Ann Mason,et al.  Problems in the Pipeline: Gender, Marriage, and Fertility in the Ivory Tower , 2008 .

[24]  Allison K Shaw,et al.  Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Shelley J. Correll,et al.  Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations , 2004 .

[26]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  The Matilda Effect in Science Communication , 2013 .

[28]  Filippo Radicchi,et al.  The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  Neven Caplar,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts , 2016, Nature Astronomy.

[30]  Matthew W Pennell,et al.  Open access is worth considering: a reply to Agrawal. , 2014, Trends in plant science.