Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Harry J de Koning | H. D. de Koning | J. Hendriks | J. Groenewoud | L. Duijm | Jan H C L Hendriks | Johanna H Groenewoud | Lucien E M Duijm
[1] Elizabeth S Burnside,et al. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[2] H. D. de Koning,et al. Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in The Netherlands. , 2001, Breast.
[3] Carol H Lee. Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[4] R. Blanks,et al. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme , 1998, Journal of medical screening.
[5] Emily F Conant,et al. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[6] J. Hendriks,et al. Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.
[7] C. Wright,et al. A customer satisfaction measuring instrument for women using the breast screening service: preliminary development and testing , 2002, Breast Cancer Research.
[8] J. Elmore,et al. Effect of False-Positive Mammograms on Interval Breast Cancer Screening in a Health Maintenance Organization , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[9] R. Given-Wilson,et al. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography , 1999, Journal of medical screening.
[10] Sara Godward,et al. Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research.
[11] L. Tabár,et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties , 2002, Cancer.
[12] M Moskowitz. Retrospective reviews of breast cancer screening: what do we really learn from them? , 1996, Radiology.
[13] S. Woolf,et al. Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[14] E A Sickles,et al. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[15] J Brown,et al. Two view mammography at incident screens: cost effectiveness analysis of policy options , 1999, BMJ.
[16] B. Littenberg,et al. Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.
[17] Mireille J. M. Broeders,et al. Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines , 1998 .
[18] H. D. de Koning,et al. Breast cancer screening and cost‐effectiveness; Policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors , 1991, International journal of cancer.
[19] J. M. de Rijke,et al. Rising incidence of breast cancer after completion of the first prevalent round of the breast cancer screening programme , 2002, Journal of medical screening.
[20] G. Severi,et al. A breast cancer screening programme operating in a liberal health care system: The Luxembourg Mammography Programme, 1992–1997 , 2002, International journal of cancer.
[21] M J Schell,et al. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[22] H. D. de Koning,et al. Nation‐wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: Results of initial and subsequent screening 1990–1995 , 1998, International journal of cancer.
[23] Ingvar Andersson,et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.
[24] I. Vejborg,et al. Early outcome of mammography screening in Copenhagen 1991–99 , 2002, Journal of medical screening.
[25] E A Sickles,et al. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[26] H. D. de Koning,et al. Quantitative interpretation of age-specific mortality reductions from the Swedish breast cancer-screening trials. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[27] J. Hendriks,et al. Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment? , 1997, The British journal of radiology.