On the Use of Surrogate Species in Conservation Biology

Abstract: Conservation biologists have used surrogate species as a shortcut to monitor or solve conservation problems. Indicator species have been used to assess the magnitude of anthropogenic disturbance, to monitor population trends in other species, and to locate areas of high regional biodiversity. Umbrella species have been used to delineate the type of habitat or size of area for protection, and flagship species have been employed to attract public attention. Unfortunately, there has been considerable confusion over these terms, and several have been applied loosely and interchangeably. We attempt to provide some clarification and guidelines for the application of these different terms. For each type of surrogate, we briefly describe the way it has been used in conservation biology and then examine the criteria that managers and researchers use in selecting appropriate surrogate species. By juxtaposing these concepts, it becomes clear that both the goals and selection criteria of different surrogate classes differ substantially, indicating that they should not be conflated. This can be facilitated by first outlining the goals of a conservation study, explicitly stating the criteria involved in selecting a surrogate species, identifying a species according to these criteria, and then performing a pilot study to check whether the choice of species was appropriate before addressing the conservation problem itself. Surrogate species need to be used with greater care if they are to remain useful in conservation biology.

[1]  A. Rabinowitz.  Jaguar: One Man's Struggle to Establish the World's First Jaguar Preserve , 2000 .

[2]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Who's Where in North America? , 1999 .

[3]  Autocorrelated Rates of Change in Animal Populations and their Relationship to Precipitation , 1998 .

[4]  D. Pearson,et al.  Global Patterns of Species Richness: Spatial Models for Conservation Planning Using Bioindicator and Precipitation Data , 1998 .

[5]  J. Donázar,et al.  Raptors as Indicators of Environmental Change in the Scrub Habitat of Baja California Sur, Mexico , 1998 .

[6]  D. Simberloff.  Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? , 1998 .

[7]  K. Lips.  Decline of a Tropical Montane Amphibian Fauna , 1998 .

[8]  D. Kleiman,et al.  Recovery and Management Committees for Lion Tamarins: Partnerships in Conservation Planning and Implementation , 1998 .

[9]  J. Lawton.  Conservation Biology , 1998, Springer US.

[10]  J. Kerr.  Species Richness, Endemism, and the Choice of Areas for Conservation , 1997 .

[11]  R. Lambeck,et al.  Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck , 2022 .

[12]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Hunting and the Likelihood of Extinction of Amazonian Mammals , 1997 .

[13]  J. Berger,et al.  Population Constraints Associated with the Use of Black Rhinos as an Umbrella Species for Desert Herbivores , 1997 .

[14]  A. Dobson,et al.  Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United States , 1997, Science.

[15]  E. Wikramanayake,et al.  A framework for identifying high priority areas and actions for the conservation of tigers in the wild. , 1997 .

[16]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[17]  L. Skärby,et al.  Exposure of a grass-clover mixture to ozone in open-top chambers—effects on yield, quality and botanical composition , 1996 .

[18]  David Tilman,et al.  Insect species diversity, abundance and body size relationships , 1996, Nature.

[19]  T. McClanahan,et al.  Effect of Sea Urchin Reductions on Algae, Coral, and Fish Populations , 1996 .

[20]  C. Downer.  The mountain tapir, endangered ‘flagship’ species of the high Andes , 1996, Oryx.

[21]  K. Gaston.  Species richness : measure and measurement , 1996 .

[22]  A. Chase.  In a Dark Wood: The Fight over Forests and the Rising Tyranny of Ecology , 1995 .

[23]  L. Skärby,et al.  Clover as an indicator plant for phytotoxic ozone concentrations: visible injury in relation to species, leaf age and exposure dynamics. , 1995, The New phytologist.

[24]  R. Panzer,et al.  Prevalence of remnant dependence among the prairie and savanna inhabiting insects of the Chicago Region , 1995 .

[25]  C. Humphries,et al.  MEASURING BIODIVERSITY VALUE FOR CONSERVATION , 1995 .

[26]  K. Gaston,et al.  Predicting the species richness of neotropical forest butterflies: Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators , 1995 .

[27]  D. Pearson,et al.  Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  Ghillean T. Prance,et al.  A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species numbers in the assessment of biodiversity in the neotropics , 1994 .

[29]  A. Johnsingh,et al.  Conserving Rajaji and Corbett National Parks – the elephant as a flagship species , 1994, Oryx.

[30]  J. Dietz,et al.  The effective use of flagship species for conservation of biodiversity: the example of lion tamarins in Brazil , 1994 .

[31]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Measuring more of biodiversity: Can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? , 1994 .

[32]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments: a case of a threatened butterfly and a vanishing grassland ecosystem , 1994 .

[33]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies , 1993, Nature.

[34]  J. Franklin.  Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[36]  G. Miller,et al.  Foraging flexibility of adelie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae: Consequences for an indicator species , 1993 .

[37]  Randall T Ryti,et al.  Effect of the Focal Taxon on the Selection of Nature Reserves. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[38]  D. Pearson,et al.  World‐Wide Species Richness Patterns of Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): Indicator Taxon for Biodiversity and Conservation Studies , 1992 .

[39]  Claire Kremen,et al.  Assessing the Indicator Properties of Species Assemblages for Natural Areas Monitoring. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[40]  B. Noon,et al.  Integrating Scientific Methods with Habitat Conservation Planning: Reserve Design for Northern Spotted Owls. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[41]  P. Landres.  Ecological Indicators: Panacea or Liability? , 1992 .

[42]  L. Underhill,et al.  Recovery Rate of Juvenile Cape Gannets: A Potential Indicator of Marine Conditions , 1992 .

[43]  Identification and Use of Plant Species as Ecological Indicators of Air Pollution Stress in National Park Units , 1992 .

[44]  C. Bibby,et al.  Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation , 1992 .

[45]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Choosing Ecological Indicators: Effects of Taxonomic Aggregation on Sensitivity to Stress and Natural Variability , 1992 .

[46]  T. Elmqvist,et al.  Flying Foxes as Strong Interactors in South Pacific Island Ecosystems: A Conservation Hypothesis , 1991 .

[47]  A. Rabinowitz.  Jaguar : one man's battle to establish the world's first jaguar preserve , 1991 .

[48]  J. Karr.  Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[49]  R. Noss.  Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[50]  L. Vitt,et al.  Amphibians as harbingers of decay , 1990 .

[51]  B. Esbensen,et al.  Great Northern Diver: The Loon , 1990 .

[52]  R. B. Hamilton,et al.  Faunal Changes and Bottomland Hardwood Forest Loss in the Tensas Watershed, Louisiana , 1989 .

[53]  G. Schafer.  Site Indicator Species for Predicting Productivity of Pine Plantations in the Southern Cape , 1989 .

[54]  Lee Belbin,et al.  Selecting representative reserve systems in remote areas: A case study in the Nullarbor region, Australia , 1989 .

[55]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Ecological Uses of Vertebrate Indicator Species: A Critique , 1988 .

[56]  S. Kellert.  3. Social and Perceptual Factors in the Preservation of Animal Species , 1988 .

[57]  R. Munn.  The design of integrated monitoring systems to provide early indications of environmental/ecological changes , 1988, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[58]  D. Western.  Africa's elephants and rhinos: Flagships in crisis. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  J. R. Murphy,et al.  REPORT OF THE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL ON THE SPOTTED OWL , 1987 .

[60]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity , 1987 .

[61]  David R. Patton,et al.  Is the Use of Management Indicator Species Feasible , 1987 .

[62]  Pacific Southwest Forest,et al.  Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates , 1987 .

[63]  Jr. John Cairns,et al.  The Myth of the Most Sensitive SpeciesMultispecies testing can provide valuable evidence for protecting the environment , 1986 .

[64]  R. Szaro.  Guild management: an evaluation of avian guilds as a predictive tool , 1986 .

[65]  J. L. Gittleman.  Carnivore Life History Patterns: Allometric, Phylogenetic, and Ecological Associations , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[66]  B. Beck,et al.  Conservation Program for the Golden Lion Tamarin: Captive Research and Management, Ecological Studies, Educational Strategies, and Reintroduction , 1986 .

[67]  J. Cairns.  Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental hazard? , 1984, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[68]  C. Bock,et al.  Birds as grazing indicator species in southeastern Arizona , 1984 .

[69]  J. Mcneely,et al.  National parks, conservation, and development. The role of protected areas in sustaining society. Proceedings of the World Congress on National Parks, Bali, Indonesia, 11-12 October 1982. , 1984 .

[70]  Jared Verner.  The guild concept applied to management of bird populations , 1984 .

[71]  Peter B. Landres,et al.  Use of the guild concept in environmental impact assessment , 1983 .

[72]  C. Walker.  Pesticides and birds — mechanisms of selective toxicity , 1983 .

[73]  G. Patil,et al.  Environmental biomonitoring, assessment, prediction, and management : certain case studies and related quantitative issues , 1982 .

[74]  H. S. Panwar.  What to do when you've succeeded: Project Tiger ten years later , 1982 .

[75]  K. Mellanby.  Environmental indices. Theory and practice , 1980 .

[76]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective , 1980 .

[77]  Wildlife as Monitors.  Animals as monitors of environmental pollutants , 1979 .

[78]  Susan E. Cook.  Quest for an index of community structure sensitive to water pollution , 1976 .

[79]  R. Risebrough,et al.  Brown pelicans: improved reproduction off the southern California coast , 1975, Science.

[80]  L. Blus,et al.  Organochlorine residues in brown pelican eggs: Relation to reproductive success , 1974 .

[81]  W. A. Thomas.  Indicators of Environmental Quality , 1971, Science.

[82]  M. Grzimek,et al.  Serengeti Shall Not Die , 1962 .

[83]  C. Elton,et al.  The Ten-Year Cycle in Numbers of the Lynx in Canada , 1942 .

[84]  L. Brennan.  The use of Guilds and Guild-Indicator Species for Assessing Habitat Suitability , 2022 .