Status updates through queues

Anytime, anywhere network connectivity, together with portable sensing and computing devices have led to applications in which sources, for example people or environmental sensors, send updates of their status, for example location, to interested recipients, say a location service. These applications desire status updates at the recipients to be as timely as possible; however, this is typically constrained by limited network resources. We employ a time-averaged age metric for characterizing performance of such status update systems. We use system abstractions consisting of a source, a service facility and monitors, with the model of the service facility (physical constraints) a given. While prior work examined first-come-first-served (FCFS) queues, this paper looks at the queue discipline of last-come-first-served (LCFS). We explore LCFS systems with and without the ability to preempt the packet currently in service. For each we derive a general expression for system age and solve for the average age a Poisson source can achieve given memoryless service. Specifically, when preemption is allowed, we evaluate how the source would share the service facility with other independent Poisson sources.

[1]  Mukesh Singhal,et al.  Hello protocols for ad-hoc networks: overhead and accuracy tradeoffs , 2005, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[2]  Krithi Ramamritham,et al.  Deriving deadlines and periods for real-time update transactions , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[3]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Real-time status: How often should one update? , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[4]  Scott Shenker,et al.  A scalable Web cache consistency architecture , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[5]  Evaggelia Pitoura,et al.  ETL queues for active data warehousing , 2005, IQIS '05.

[6]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  Vehicular communication systems: Enabling technologies, applications, and future outlook on intelligent transportation , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Sanjit Krishnan Kaul,et al.  Minimizing age of information in vehicular networks , 2011, 2011 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[8]  Daniel S Papp,et al.  Information Age: An Anthology on Its Impacts and Consequences , 1997 .

[9]  John Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring , 2002, WSNA '02.

[10]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  On Piggybacking in Vehicular Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[11]  Yih-Chun Hu,et al.  Ensuring cache freshness in on-demand ad hoc network routing protocols , 2002, POMC '02.