Spatio-temporal brain dynamics in a combined stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response conflict task

It is yet not well known whether different types of conflicts share common or rely on distinct brain mechanisms of conflict processing. We used a combined Flanker (stimulus-stimulus; S-S) and Simon (stimulus-response; S-R) conflict paradigm both in an fMRI and an EEG study. S-S conflicts induced stronger behavioral interference effects compared to S-R conflicts and the latter decayed with increasing response latencies. Besides some similar medial frontal activity across all conflict trials, which was, however, not statically consistent across trials, we especially found distinct activations depending on the type of conflict. S-S conflicts activated the anterior cingulate cortex and modulated the N2 and early P3 component with underlying source activity in inferior frontal cortex. S-R conflicts produced distinct activations in the posterior cingulate cortex and modulated the late P3b component with underlying source activity in superior parietal cortex. Double conflict trials containing both S-S and S-R conflicts revealed, first, distinct anterior frontal activity representing a meta-processing unit and, second, a sequential modulation of the N2 and the P3b component. The N2 modulation during double conflict trials was accompanied by increased source activity in the medial frontal gyrus (MeFG). In summary, S-S and S-R conflict processing mostly rely on distinct mechanisms of conflict processing and these conflicts differentially modulate the temporal stages of stimulus processing.

[1]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[2]  E. Kandel,et al.  Resolving Emotional Conflict: A Role for the Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Modulating Activit , 2006 .

[3]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Application of Information Technology: An Integrated Software Suite for Surface-based Analyses of Cerebral Cortex , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[5]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Reliance on external cues for movement initiation in Parkinson's disease. Evidence from movement-related potentials. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Dennis Van 't Ent Perceptual and motor contributions to performance and ERP components after incorrect motor activation in a flanker reaction task. , 2002, Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Conflict Monitoring, and Levels of Processing , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Requin,et al.  The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .

[10]  T. Egner,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  J R Simon,et al.  Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[12]  G Mulder,et al.  Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  Manfred Herrmann,et al.  Comparison of two Simon tasks: Neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  Manfred Herrmann,et al.  How the brain resolves high conflict situations: Double conflict involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Transformations in the Couplings Among Intellectual Abilities and Constituent Cognitive Processes Across the Life Span , 2004, Psychological science.

[17]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[18]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  O. Gruber,et al.  Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study , 2009, Cortex.

[21]  T. Egner Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  Tom Johnstone,et al.  Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple‐subject fMRI analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[24]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Mike Wendt,et al.  Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  C A Oliver,et al.  Tests for Color-blindness. , 1881, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[27]  M. Petrides Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  G Gratton,et al.  Visual spatial localization conflict: an fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[29]  E. Koechlin,et al.  The Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Science.

[30]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  John C Gore,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  Manfred Herrmann,et al.  Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: An ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[33]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[34]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[35]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[36]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Flanker and Simon effects interact at the response selection stage , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  D. Algom,et al.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. , 2003, Psychological review.

[38]  Montserrat Zurrón,et al.  Event-related potentials with the Stroop colour-word task: timing of semantic conflict. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[39]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[40]  C. Carter,et al.  The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  E. Kandel,et al.  Resolving Emotional Conflict: A Role for the Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Modulating Activity in the Amygdala , 2006, Neuron.

[42]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[43]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: a lateralized event-related potential study , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  F. Valle-Inclán,et al.  The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[45]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[47]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[48]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[49]  C. Olson,et al.  Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Matthias Weisbrod,et al.  Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first? , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  J. Jonides,et al.  Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[53]  B R Rosen,et al.  The Multi-Source Interference Task: validation study with fMRI in individual subjects , 2003, Molecular Psychiatry.

[54]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: a high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[55]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[57]  Xun Liu,et al.  Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[58]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  Ben Godde,et al.  Physical and motor fitness are both related to cognition in old age , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[60]  Tobias Egner,et al.  The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task , 2005, NeuroImage.

[61]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[62]  Patrick Berg,et al.  Artifact Correction of the Ongoing EEG Using Spatial Filters Based on Artifact and Brain Signal Topographies , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[63]  A. Nobre,et al.  Heterogeneity of Cingulate Contributions to Spatial Attention , 2001, NeuroImage.

[64]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Attentional origins of the Simon effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2008, Brain Research.