Why Don't Housing Choice Voucher Recipients Live Near Better Schools? Insights from Big Data.

Housing choice vouchers provide low‐income households with additional income to spend on rental housing in the private market. The assistance vouchers provide is substantial, offering the potential to dramatically expand the neighborhoods—and associated public schools—that low‐income households can reach. However, existing research on the program suggests that housing choice voucher holders live in neighborhoods with schools that are no better than those accessible to other households with similar incomes. Households, in other words, do not seem to spend the additional income provided by the voucher to access better schools. In this analysis we rely on a large‐scale administrative data set to explore why voucher households typically do not live near to better schools, as measured by school‐level proficiency rates. We combine confidential administrative data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development on 1.4 million housing choice voucher holders in 15 states, with school‐level data from 5,841 different school districts, to examine why the average housing voucher holder does not live near to higher‐performing schools than otherwise similar households without vouchers. Specifically, we use the large‐scale administrative data set to test whether voucher holders living in areas with good schools nearby and slack housing markets move toward better schools when schools become salient for them—that is, when their oldest child becomes school eligible. We take advantage of the thick sample of households with young children provided through our administrative data to implement both a household fixed effects and a regression discontinuity design. Together these analyses shed light on whether voucher households are more likely to move toward better schools when schools are most relevant, and how market conditions shape that response. We find that families with vouchers are more likely to move toward a better school in the year before their oldest child meets the eligibility cutoff for kindergarten, suggesting salience matters. Further, the magnitude of the effect is larger in metropolitan areas with a relatively high share of affordable rental units located near high‐performing schools and in neighborhoods in close proximity to higher‐performing schools. Results suggest that, if given the appropriate information and opportunities, more voucher families would move to better schools when their children reach school age.

[1]  Ethan Lewis,et al.  Schooling and the Armed Forces Qualifying Test , 2006, The Journal of Human Resources.

[2]  M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Preschoolers Enrolled and Mothers at Work? The Effects of Universal Pre-Kindergarten , 2008 .

[3]  Amanda Ross,et al.  The Impact of Housing Vouchers on Mobility and Neighborhood Attributes , 2011 .

[4]  Kirk McClure The low‐income housing tax credit program goes mainstream and moves to the suburbs , 2006 .

[5]  Lan Deng Comparing the Effects of Housing Vouchers and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits on Neighborhood Integration and School Quality , 2007 .

[6]  Gregorio Caetano Quasi-Experimental Evidence of School Choice through Residential Sorting ⇤ , 2013 .

[7]  Raj Chetty,et al.  The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment , 2015, The American economic review.

[8]  Kamhon Kan,et al.  Residential mobility and social capital , 2007 .

[9]  A. Bartel Race Differences in Job Satisfaction: A Reappraisal , 1981 .

[10]  J. E. Kaufman,et al.  The Education and Employment of Low-Income Black Youth in White Suburbs , 1992 .

[11]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Do Housing Choice Voucher holders live near good schools , 2014 .

[12]  P. Rosenblatt,et al.  Does Moving to Better Neighborhoods Lead to Better Schooling Opportunities? Parental School Choice in an Experimental Housing Voucher Program , 2010, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[13]  R. Pendall Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods , 2000 .

[14]  J. Ludwig,et al.  The Impact of Housing Assistance on Child Outcomes: Evidence from a Randomized Housing Lottery , 2015 .

[15]  Kelly Bedard,et al.  The Persistence of Early Childhood Maturity: International Evidence of Long-Run Age Effects , 2006 .

[16]  Raj Chetty,et al.  The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility: Childhood Exposure Effects and County-Level Estimates , 2015 .

[17]  Justine S. Hastings,et al.  Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments , 2007 .

[18]  M. Farnsworth,et al.  Creating a Metric of Educational Opportunity for Assisted Households , 2011 .

[19]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Changing the Geography of Opportunity by Expanding Residential Choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux Program , 1995 .

[20]  G. Kingsley,et al.  Patterns of Section 8 Relocation in the Hope vi Program , 2003 .

[21]  I. Ellen,et al.  Do Vouchers Help Low- Income Households Live in Safer Neighborhoods? Evidence on the Housing Choice Voucher Program , 2011 .

[22]  G. Mills,et al.  Housing affordability and family well‐being: Results from the housing voucher evaluation , 2008 .

[23]  Fernando V. Ferreira,et al.  Do School Entry Laws Affect Educational Attainment and Labor Market Outcomes? , 2007 .

[24]  Jeffrey R. Kling,et al.  Neighborhoods and Academic Achievement: Results from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 11909. , 2006 .

[25]  Peter Rosenblatt,et al.  “We Don't Live Outside, We Live in Here”: Neighborhood and Residential Mobility Decisions among Low–Income Families † , 2012 .

[26]  J. Henig,et al.  Housing Vouchers and Certificates as a Vehicle for Deconcentrating the Poor , 1997 .