Nonlinear Deterministic Analysis of Air Pollution Dynamics in a Rural and Agricultural Setting

Applications of nonlinear dynamic tools for studying air pollution are gaining attention. Studies on ozone concentration in urban areas have reported the presence of low-dimensional deterministic natures and thus the possibility of good predictions of air pollution dynamics. In light of these encouraging results, a nonlinear deterministic approach is employed herein to study air pollution dynamics in a rural, and largely agricultural, setting in California. Specifically, air quality index (AQI) data observed at the University of California, Davis/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (UCD/NOAA) climate station are studied. Four different daily AQI types of data are analyzed: maximum, minimum, difference (between maximum and minimum), and average. The correlation dimension method, a nonlinear dynamic technique that uses phase–space reconstruction and nearest neighbor concepts, is employed to identify the nature of the underlying dynamics, whether high-dimensional or low-dimensional. Correlation dimensions of 5.12, 6.20, 6.68, and 5.84 obtained for the above four series, respectively, indicate the presence of low-dimensional deterministic behavior, with six or seven dominant governing variables in the underlying dynamics. The dimension results and number of variables are in reasonable agreement with those reported by past studies, even though the studied data are different: rural versus urban, and AQI versus ozone concentration. Future efforts will focus on strengthening the present results on the nature of air pollution dynamics, identifying the actual governing variables, and predictions of air pollution dynamics.

[1]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Correlation dimension estimation of hydrological series and data size requirement: myth and reality/Estimation de la dimension de corrélation de séries hydrologiques et taille nécessaire du jeu de données: mythe et réalité , 2005 .

[2]  M. C. Dodge A comparison of three photochemical oxidant mechanisms , 1989 .

[3]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Geometry from a Time Series , 1980 .

[4]  R. Simpson,et al.  Forecasting peak ozone levels , 1983 .

[5]  Holger Kantz,et al.  Observing and Predicting Chaotic Signals: Is 2% Noise Too Much? , 1996 .

[6]  Joachim Holzfuss,et al.  Approach to error-estimation in the application of dimension algorithms , 1986 .

[7]  A. Heagle,et al.  Ozone and Crop Yield , 1989 .

[8]  Farmer,et al.  Predicting chaotic time series. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[9]  R. J. Farber,et al.  Time series analysis of an historical visibility data base , 1982 .

[10]  Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe,et al.  A Possible Explanation for Low Correlation Dimension Estimates for the Atmosphere , 1993 .

[11]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  Chaos in rainfall , 1989 .

[12]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  Estimating the Dimension of Weather and Climate Attractors: Important Issues about the Procedure and Interpretation , 1993 .

[13]  H. Jäger,et al.  Assessment of past, present, and future impacts of ozone and carbon dioxide on crop yields , 1995 .

[14]  H. Schuster,et al.  Proper choice of the time delay for the analysis of chaotic time series , 1989 .

[15]  Klaus Fraedrich,et al.  Estimating the Dimensions of Weather and Climate Attractors , 1986 .

[16]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[17]  Shie-Yui Liong,et al.  A systematic approach to noise reduction in chaotic hydrological time series , 1999 .

[18]  J. Havstad,et al.  Attractor dimension of nonstationary dynamical systems from small data sets. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[19]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Dominant processes concept in hydrology: moving forward , 2004 .

[20]  G. Nicolis,et al.  Is there a climatic attractor? , 1984, Nature.

[21]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Chaos theory in geophysics: past, present and future , 2004 .

[22]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[23]  Guido Deboeck,et al.  Trading on the Edge: Neural, Genetic, and Fuzzy Systems for Chaotic Financial Markets , 1994 .

[24]  Graciela B. Raga,et al.  The nature of air pollution dynamics in Mexico City , 1996 .

[25]  D. B. Friedman,et al.  An interdisciplinary, experiment station-based participatory comparison of alternative crop management systems for California's Sacramento Valley , 1994 .

[26]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Rainfall dynamics at different temporal scales: A chaotic perspective , 2001 .

[27]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Chaos theory in hydrology: important issues and interpretations , 2000 .

[28]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Estimation of the dominant degrees of freedom for air pollutant concentration data: Applications to ozone measurements , 1994 .

[29]  A. Provenzale,et al.  Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra , 1989 .

[30]  A. N. Sharkovskiĭ Dynamic systems and turbulence , 1989 .

[31]  Kasım Koçak,et al.  Nonlinear time series prediction of O3 concentration in Istanbul , 2000 .

[32]  J H Seinfeld,et al.  Ozone air quality models. A critical review. , 1988, JAPCA.

[33]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[34]  Sunil Saigal,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics Detection and predictive modeling of chaos in finite hydrological time series , 2018 .

[35]  Shaun Lovejoy,et al.  DISCUSSION of “Evidence of chaos in the rainfall-runoff process” Which chaos in the rainfall-runoff process? , 2002 .

[36]  Ronny Berndtsson,et al.  Fractal Analysis of High-Resolution Rainfall Time Series , 1993 .

[37]  Paul J. Lioy,et al.  An Empirical Model for Forecasting Maximum Daily Ozone Levels in the Northeastern U.S. , 1978 .

[38]  Leonard A. Smith Intrinsic limits on dimension calculations , 1988 .

[39]  Terry L. Clark,et al.  Application of Prognostic Meteorological Variables to Forecasts of Daily Maximum One-Hour Ozone Concentrations in the Northeastern United States , 1982 .

[40]  T. Y. Chang,et al.  Assessing ozone-precursor relationships based on a smog production model and ambient data. , 1995, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[41]  W. Ditto,et al.  Chaos: From Theory to Applications , 1992 .

[42]  Scott M. Robeson,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of statistical forecast models for daily maximum ozone concentrations , 1990 .

[43]  O. C. Taylor,et al.  Assessment of Crop Loss From Air Pollutants , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[44]  Ronny Berndtsson,et al.  Reply to “Which chaos in the rainfall-runoff process?” , 2002 .

[45]  G. Raga,et al.  On the nature of air pollution dynamics in Mexico City—I. Nonlinear analysis , 1996 .

[46]  L. Liebovitch,et al.  A fast algorithm to determine fractal dimensions by box counting , 1989 .

[47]  E. Lorenz Dimension of weather and climate attractors , 1991, Nature.

[48]  S. Islam,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of hourly ozone concentrations. nonparametric short term prediction , 1998 .

[49]  George Sugihara,et al.  Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series , 1990, Nature.

[50]  Rao St,et al.  Detecting and tracking changes in ozone air quality. , 1994 .

[51]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[52]  J. Elsner,et al.  The weather attractor over very short timescales , 1988, Nature.