Perceived Service Quality in a University Web Portal: Revising the E-Qual Instrument

Online service quality is a much-studied concept. Despite this, dimensions that make up service quality, and the items used to measure those dimensions have proven unstable. It is widely suggested that service quality measurement scales need to be instantiated differently in different business domains. In addition, the nature of online services is continually changing. Universities have been at the forefront of this change, with university Websites increasingly acting as a portal for a wide range of online transactions for a wide range of stakeholders. In this work-in-progress, qualitative study, we conduct focus groups with a range of stakeholders in university Web portals with a view to adapting the e-qual instrument for use in a university Web portal environment. We find support for a new service quality dimension, and for additional items in existing scales. We conclude by proposing a revised instrument that can form the basis for a more extensive quantitative study

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[2]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[3]  Judy McKay,et al.  Strategic Management of E-Business , 2004 .

[4]  Stephen Chen,et al.  Strategic Management of e-Business , 2001 .

[5]  J. Carman.  Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions , 1990 .

[6]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[7]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality , 1994 .

[8]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  An Integrative Approach to the Assessment of E-Commerce Quality , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[9]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns for a Complete Canvas , 1997, MIS Q..

[10]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge , 2002, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[11]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Sangeeta Sahney,et al.  Conceptualizing total quality management in higher education , 2004 .

[13]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[14]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use Instruments for Decision Making: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis , 1998 .

[15]  Lucía Melián Alzola,et al.  Servqual: Its Applicability in Electronic Commerce B2C , 2005 .

[16]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Stefan Lagrosen,et al.  Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education , 2004 .

[18]  P. A. Dabholkar.  Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality , 1996 .

[19]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Introduction to the AIS Code of Research Conduct , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e‐government , 2004 .

[21]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Longitudinal Measurement of Service Quality in Information Systems: A Case Study , 1994, ICIS.

[22]  M. Miles,et al.  Data management and analysis methods. , 1994 .

[23]  Brian J. Corbitt,et al.  User attributes in Web-based electronic service adoption model (e-sam) , 2003, Proceedings IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003).

[24]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[25]  S. Gounaris,et al.  Assessing service quality on the Web: evidence from business‐to‐consumer portals , 2003 .

[26]  Tsuang Kuo,et al.  Measuring users' perceived portal service quality: An empirical study , 2005 .

[27]  Julian Teicher,et al.  E-government: a new route to public sector quality , 2002 .

[28]  Martin O'Neill,et al.  Importance‐performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education , 2004 .

[29]  Elaine Aspinwall,et al.  A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education , 1996 .

[30]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  An Evaluation of Cyber-Bookshops: The WebQual Method , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[31]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Implementing successful self-service technologies , 2002 .

[32]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Assessing the quality of auction Web sites , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Guy Paré,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[35]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[36]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .