Eco-design model of a railway: A method for comparing the energy consumption of two project variants

Abstract In accordance with the environmental concerns that national policies still address throughout the world, railways have been extensively studied to provide quantified indicators for assessing construction/operations practices. It is essential to take energy consumption, into account since energy can be measured worldwide, in addition to constituting a global environmental load that is time-limited as regards resource availability and known as a discriminating criterion in comparing transport infrastructure. This article introduces an innovative, generic and systemic method dedicated to determining the energy consumption of a railway line during the pre-project phase by taking into account the complete life cycle of the rail infrastructure, including construction, maintenance and operations. The method developed (called ≪PEAM ≫) focuses on assessing project variants during the design stage and therefore integrates both the geometric longitudinal constraints of the line and the thicknesses/volumes over the entire itinerary as design parameters for input into the various construction scenarios. PEAM combines methodologies stemming from life cycle assessment with a consumption model derived from physical modeling. The models associated with this method are then applied to study the energy consumption of a new high-speed line located in France that also has major implications for the European connections currently under investigation as well. Two project variants are compared in terms of total energy for a 50-year service life and a given characteristic rail traffic, including passenger and freight flows. Results obtained reveal a 30% difference between the two variants, which prior to applying PEAM were considered to be relatively similar.

[1]  Felix Schmid,et al.  A review of methods to measure and calculate train resistances , 2000 .

[2]  Jonas Åkerman,et al.  The role of high-speed rail in mitigating climate change : The Swedish case Europabanan from a life cycle perspective , 2011 .

[3]  Sunghoon Choi,et al.  A study of the train performance simulation for Korean next Generation high-speed train , 2007 .

[4]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California , 2010 .

[5]  Benjamin Boullanger Modeling and simulation of future railways , 2009 .

[6]  Toshiaki Setoguchi,et al.  Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train , 2002 .

[7]  Milan Janic,et al.  High-speed rail and air passenger transport: A comparison of the operational environmental performance , 2003 .

[8]  Agnès Jullien,et al.  Practical guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment applied to railways project , 2012 .

[9]  Riccardo Basosi,et al.  Air versus terrestrial transport modalities: An energy and environmental comparison , 2009 .

[10]  Henning Schwarz,et al.  Ecology profile of the german high-speed rail passenger transport system, ICE , 2003 .

[11]  Evert Andersson,et al.  Energy Consumption and Related Air Pollution for Scandinavian Electric Passenger Trains , 2006 .

[12]  Spencer C. Sorenson,et al.  Simulation of Energy Consumption and Emissions from Rail Traffic , 2005 .

[13]  Robert van den Brink,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF HIGH-SPEED RAIL LINKS IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES: A CASE STUDY OF THE DUTCH ZUIDER ZEE LINE , 2003 .

[14]  Alain Jeunesse,et al.  La motorisation du TGV POS , 2004 .

[15]  C. K. Lee,et al.  Comparison of Environmental Loads With Rail Track Systems Using Simplified Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2008 .

[16]  Clive Roberts,et al.  Rail freight in 2035 – traction energy analysis for high-performance freight trains , 2012 .

[17]  Piotr Lukaszewicz,et al.  Running resistance - results and analysis of full-scale tests with passenger and freight trains in Sweden , 2007 .

[18]  Brenda Chang,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of infrastructure construction for California’s high-speed rail system , 2011 .

[19]  Pierre Fayet Modélisation des réseaux électriques ferroviaires alimentés en courant alternatif , 2008 .

[20]  Stéphanie Leheis,et al.  High-speed train planning in France: Lessons from the Mediterranean TGV-line , 2009 .

[21]  Tristan Lorino,et al.  Model of High-Speed Train Energy Consumption , 2013 .

[22]  A. Horvath,et al.  Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains , 2009 .

[23]  Agnès Jullien,et al.  Monitoring and environmental modeling ofearthwork impacts: A road construction case study , 2013 .